What are the general skills for procuratorate to recruit civil servants' interview questions?

Hello, Chinese public education is at your service.

1, the correctness of the view

In the interview question and answer, the viewpoint is its soul, the viewpoint is incorrect, and everything answered is in vain. The correct viewpoint is the basis of answering questions. We must strengthen the study of the party's line, principles and policies, politics, current affairs and theories in order to make the answers correct. For example, the interview question: "You are the new deputy mayor, and you have arranged work for your subordinates according to the resolution of the town government. At the same time, several subordinates gave reasons for not implementing it at the meeting, which made you very embarrassed. What should you do? " The correct way is to listen to the different opinions of the masses with an open mind and seriously investigate and understand the situation in all aspects. If the questions raised are really reasonable, they can not be implemented for the time being, and they should not be face-saving, impulsive and killed with a stick. This is a big problem of correctly treating the opinions of the masses. If the answer is "just taking office, we should embody the characteristics of' three fires', and in order to establish our own prestige, we can exert pressure and not allow negative opinions", it is wrong.

2. Accuracy of key points

For each interview question, we should first make clear the main points that should be grasped when answering, explain the interview questions clearly from several aspects, clear our minds when thinking and preparing, and make the main points accurate, unambiguous, not wordy, uncomplicated, straightforward and focused. For example, the interview question: "What will you do when you, as a leading cadre, encounter a contradiction between the spirit of an instruction from your superiors and the local actual situation?" Three points can be made clear when thinking and preparing: first, study and study the spirit of instructions from superiors, understand the essence, and grasp the policy well; Second, establish the concept of the overall situation, deploy work, obey the overall situation, be consistent with the CPC Central Committee, and order it to be banned; Third, if the instructions of the higher authorities are found to be inconsistent with the actual situation of the region and the department, suggestions for improvement and implementation can be put forward to the higher authorities.

3. Dialectical analysis.

The answers to many interview questions need dialectical analysis, open mind and absolute thinking, and most of them should be evaluated from a dialectical point of view to prevent one-sidedness and simplification of the answers. For example, the interview question: "As the ancients said,' A suspect is not a suspect'. Do you adopt the view of' employing people without doubt' when using subordinate cadres? " We should not simply affirm or deny this question. This old adage should be analyzed dialectically, which has both beneficial and unfavorable aspects. "No doubt about employing people" embodies the spirit and style of full trust and bold use in employing people after investigation, analysis and judgment, which should influence and motivate users to produce the mental state of "being a bosom friend until death". However, it is not advisable to employ people without any doubt, because the growth of employing people is influenced by various factors and constantly changes. The theory of "no doubt" will regard things as death, which tends to generalize the best and cover the worst with the best, leading to laissez-faire and neglecting measures such as use, training, education, inspection and supervision, thus leading to changes in employees. Therefore, the correct use of people is undoubtedly dialectical.

4, the completeness of the answer

Everyone wants to answer questions perfectly and try not to miss the main points, so as to improve their grades. If you want a satisfactory answer, you must be open-minded and thoughtful. For example, interview questions: "Legend has it that a man named Liu Xiahui spent the night in a hotel. Due to the sudden cold, a woman staying in a hotel is going to freeze to death. Liu held him in his arms and sat until dawn. No indecent acts. Analyze the enlightenment of this story of' sitting still' to leading cadres in politics. " To answer this question, of course, the main thing is that leading cadres should have good conduct and decent style. But in addition, there are several inspirations from this story, such as being good at helping others, daring to break the customs, being determined, obeying the law and so on. What should be put forward in order to answer the original intention of the examination questions more satisfactorily and reflect a candidate's rich thinking and correct views on social problems and various situations.

5, the logic of the statement

One of the abilities to be tested in an interview is the ability of logical thinking. In the mental preparation after hearing the interview questions, the first thing you need is the logic of thinking, and then the logic of statement. This logic requires clear hierarchy, close connection and consistent response. Answer this and conquer the examiner. For example, the interview question: "As a deputy, when studying the problem with the main leaders, you think your opinion is correct, but it was not adopted after it was put forward. How do you handle this situation? " When you are thinking, you should be clear about the following ideas: first, treat the public fairly and calmly; Second, we should comprehensively analyze the correctness and feasibility of our own views; Third, if you confirm that your opinion is feasible, you can further reflect your statement to the main leaders; Fourth, if the statement is still not recognized and supported, you can reserve your opinions. If it is a major problem, you can reflect it to your superiors. Answer, step by step, step by step to expand their own views, so that they are interlocking, thus increasing the logic of the question-and-answer statement.

6. Innovation of ideas

When you are thinking and preparing for an interview, you should introduce new ideas with new ideas. In the new situation, you should abandon the old inertia and put forward new ideas, which will be more conducive to your success in the interview. For example, the interview question: "Why can some units' three heads are better than one Zhuge Liang', while others' three monks have no water to drink'? If it is the latter case, what should you do when you take office? " After listening to the topic, you can simply think about the experience of the previous unit "surpassing Zhuge Liang" and then think about the solution of the latter unit according to the requirements of the new situation. For example: (1) find the root cause and stimulate the resultant force; (2) rational use of people, from each according to his ability; (3) Clear responsibilities and rewards and punishments according to the system; (4) Quota and posts, introducing competition mechanism. This question and answer closely combines the current situation and embodies new ideas.

7. The profundity of the theory

The interview answer itself has the characteristics of theoretical test, and the answer should have a certain theoretical height. For example, there should be a basis for answering questions, or the party's principles and policies, or national laws and regulations, or famous sayings and aphorisms, or specific case materials, all of which need a certain theoretical basis, so as to better quote classics, sublimate and demonstrate questions in an all-round way. For example, the interview question: "At present, there are different disputes about the' last elimination system' implemented by some units. How do you view this employment measure? " The objective answer should be: "the last elimination system" is a transitional measure to the development of competition mechanism, which can be tried out; But it depends on the situation, not across the board. Moreover, the "last elimination system" is not completely equivalent to the competition mechanism. It is not bad for a large-scale unit with a large number of people to implement the competition mechanism first and then. If it is implemented in a small-scale unit with a small number of people, the effect may not be good, because some units do have a small number of people, and almost all the staff have worked hard and achieved good results, even neck and neck. If implemented, it will cause panic and interpersonal tension.

If in doubt, please consult the public education enterprises in China.