Job Recruitment Website - Zhaopincom - How about Bailide (Huzhou) Automobile Safety System Co., Ltd.
How about Bailide (Huzhou) Automobile Safety System Co., Ltd.
The unified social credit code/registration number of Bailide (Huzhou) Automobile Safety System Co., Ltd. is 9133050066393952k, and the corporate legal person is Mark Federico Wenner. At present, the enterprise is in the state of opening.
The business scope of Bailide (Huzhou) Automobile Safety System Co., Ltd. is: developing, designing, producing and assembling automobile safety systems and their parts, selling our own products, and providing technical consultation and after-sales service. (involving special approval or licensing, it shall be approved or licensed to operate. Does not involve projects restricted or prohibited in the Catalogue for the Guidance of Foreign Investment Industries). In Zhejiang Province, the total registered capital of companies with similar business scope is 9.351.9 million yuan, and the main capital is concentrated in 27 enterprises with more than 50 million yuan and1-50 million yuan. In the province, the registered capital of enterprises is excellent.
See more information and materials of Bailide (Huzhou) Automobile Safety System Co., Ltd. through Baidu Enterprise Credit.
- Previous article:Watch manufacturers' high scores.
- Next article:Is it an operating vehicle to register for a ride in Hefei?
- Related articles
- Umbrella friends: some suggestions for overseas students returning to China to start businesses
- Has Roewe Securities gone bankrupt?
- Is it necessary to register for a professional interview in the recruitment of Yangzhou public institutions (doctors)?
- What are the professional technical tests for the benefits of cloud computing?
- All addresses of Shanghai Taiqi Bakery
- Is Lutian Chemical Fertilizer a Big Manufacturer?
- Wage of Stomatology Department of Taihe County People's Hospital
- Operation Practice of Cup Theory
- Is the Development College of Jilin Agricultural University run by the people?
- Why do arguments such as "academic qualifications are useless" and "reading is useless" always exist?