Job Recruitment Website - Zhaopincom - How to ensure the authenticity of information collected

How to ensure the authenticity of information collected

The desire for high-end talents in the service industry in Eastern Province is understandable, but the author feels that the special preferential individual tax policy for senior talents proposed by the Provincial Political Consultative Conference is tantamount to treating the individual tax policy as a prize. Distributing them at will is really hard to agree with. On the one hand, it is contrary to existing laws. According to the latest revision of the Personal Income Tax Law by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, starting from March this year, the national personal income tax starting point is 2,000 yuan, which means that the monthly exemption limit is 2,000 yuan. As a first-level government, Guangdong Province certainly does not have the power to increase the exemption amount without authorization or issue policies that are inconsistent with national laws.

2. Huaibei City’s legal aid work has achieved remarkable results and achieved good social benefits. Legal aid is a “popular project” that the government serves the people. In order to lay a solid foundation for legal aid work, we must improve the legal system in cities, counties (districts) On the basis of legal aid, all 27 towns and towns in the city have established legal aid workstations, and 80 communities (villages) have set up legal aid points, basically forming a four-level vertical legal aid system consisting of city, county (district), township, and community (village). Network, and issue normative documents to clarify the responsibilities of each assistance workstation and formulate workstation work procedures so that people in need can apply for legal aid at their nearest location in a timely manner.

3. Legal social family training and education mechanism: How to confront Liu Haiyang: In the discussion involving the legal responsibility of the perpetrator, some people believe that the perpetrator’s behavior should be deemed illegal in accordance with Article 341 of the Criminal Law Hunting or killing wild animals is a crime, but this law protects national wild animal resources. The purpose is to punish those who destroy wild animals and protect the human living environment. In the "bear injury incident", the person injured was not an animal in the general sense, let alone a wild animal protected by the state. The five bears that Liu Haiyang injured were bought by the zoo for tens of thousands of yuan. In order to raise these animals, the zoo invested a lot of manpower and material resources to build venues, configure equipment, purchase feed, etc.; the zoo also used these animals to attract tourists. Visit to gain business income. This shows that although these five bears still have the physical characteristics of wild animals, they have actually been given social attributes, that is, property attributes. The object Liu violated was public property protected by national law, and he should be convicted and sentenced based on the crime of "intentional destruction of public and private property." Article 275 of the Criminal Law stipulates: “Whoever intentionally destroys public or private property, the amount is relatively large, or there are other serious circumstances, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than 3 years, criminal detention, or a fine; if the amount is huge or there are other particularly serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to not less than 3 years but not more than 7 years. Fixed-term imprisonment. "In the process of transferring the case to the judicial authority, a judicial psychiatric evaluation should be conducted on the client, and then the appropriate sentence for his conviction should be considered under this premise. If Liu Haiyang does not have a legal reason to exclude criminal liability, his behavior would be consistent with the crime of intentional destruction of property.

4. Xie Yueming: The law has given "paid news" a slap in the face: On the morning of August 4, the case of Shanxi prosecutors going to Beijing to arrest a CCTV female reporter was heard in Taiyuan. Former CCTV reporter Li Min Found guilty of bribery and sentenced to three years in prison with four years suspended.

The law gave Li Min a "heavy blow", which is actually a slap in the face to "paid news".

Paid news is an activity in which journalists use unfair means to obtain material rewards from interviewees. Paid journalism also includes intentional withholding and withholding of news.

Paid news is a shameless behavior for journalists of any ideology or social system. Whether in the East or the West, paid news is expressly prohibited by journalistic professional ethics. The essence of paid news is that some news practitioners illegally sell the rights granted by the state and society to news organizations to spread news as private goods of individuals and groups, and illegally trade rights and money. Paid news is a reflection of "money worship" in the news field and an unhealthy trend in the news industry. Its existence and spread are a shame to the news industry.

The harm of paid news can be analyzed from three aspects: First, it destroys the principles of authenticity, objectivity and fairness. Because paid news is an unfair way to obtain profits by providing information services.

In order to achieve the interests of certain individuals or groups, many paid news outlets do not hesitate to exaggerate, distort facts, confuse right and wrong, and confuse right and wrong, seriously damaging public interests. Second, it reduces the quality of news reporting. We know that the mass media judge information based on its news value. The criteria for selecting paid news are to achieve the publicity benefits required by the target audience. They fill the pages and programs with things that have no news value or low news value, occupying the time and space for truly news-worthy reports, thereby affecting news publicity reports. quality. Third, it has corroded the news team. Paid news corrupts and degenerates some journalists, which not only causes personal loss, but also destroys the credibility of the media they work for.

5. The father who gave up treatment for premature babies was sentenced, triggering legal and moral discussions: Tu Cailiang was found guilty and sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment completely unexpected. "Lawyer Chen Junhua from Zhejiang Junan Century Law Firm, who defended Tu Cailiang, told reporters yesterday afternoon.

More than a month ago, Tu Cailiang was prosecuted by the Yuhang District People's Procuratorate because he gave up treatment and weighed only 950 grams. The premature son was brought home instead, resulting in the premature death of the one-day-old baby (as reported by Zaobao on June 20)

After the Yuhang District People’s Court heard the case last week. The first instance verdict was made. Lawyer Chen Junhua went to Yuhang Detention Center to meet with Tu Cailiang and asked for Tu Cailiang’s opinion on the appeal.

Tu Cailiang was very emotional during the entire meeting,” said lawyer Chen Junhua. During the meeting, Zhongtu always believed that he was not a medical expert and did not understand the law. He just listened to the doctor and felt that the child could not be cured, and he did not have the money to treat it, so he took the child home.

The income certificate issued by Tu Cailiang’s unit shows that Tu’s annual income is 18,000 yuan. According to the subsequent testimony of a nurse at the hospital where premature infants were born, the cost of treatment for premature infants is 1,000 to 2,000 yuan a day and requires 2 to 3 months of treatment.

A man who had no money to give up treatment for premature infants was sentenced

The court’s verdict was handed down on August 1. Tu Cailiang, who was originally released on bail pending trial, was taken into custody on the day the verdict was announced. He left the appeal yesterday. The deadline is 6 days away.

The court found out after trial that on January 11 this year, Tu Cailiang’s wife gave birth to a baby boy prematurely, with a gestational age of 6 months and 25 days and a weight of 950 grams. The doctor told Baby Tu that he had symptoms such as dyspnea and being underweight and needed to be rescued, but the cost of rescue was high, and even if the baby survived the rescue, there might be sequelae. Because Tu Cailiang was unwilling to bear the cost of his son's treatment and was worried that the baby would have sequelae when he grew up, he decided to give up the rescue without consulting his wife and others. He then took the baby home from the neonatal department of the hospital and handed it over to his mother. take care of. Because the necessary rescue was not provided, the baby died at about 5 a.m. the next day.

The court held that the defendant Tu Cailiang had the legal obligation to support his newborn son, but he was afraid of increasing his financial burden and gave up the necessary treatment for the baby, resulting in the death of the baby. This was a refusal to fulfill the duty of supporting the baby. obligations, the circumstances are egregious, and his behavior constitutes the crime of abandonment. The charges charged by the public prosecution were found guilty. Tu Cailiang and his defender put forward a plea of ??not guilty, but the court did not accept it. Accordingly, the court of first instance found Tu Cailiang guilty of abandonment and sentenced him to six months in prison.

6. Wuhan anti-pocketing activists are suspected of killing thieves, which has attracted social attention and the legal status of the anti-pocketing alliance has caused controversy: "Jin", whose surname is Feng, is a 27-year-old self-taught college student and a member of the "Wuhan Anti-Pocketing Volunteers Alliance" . During an operation, Xiao Feng was criminally detained on December 10, 2006 on suspicion of intentionally injuring a thief to death, and was approved for arrest on the 28th of the same month.

The dead thief is named Yang Man (pseudonym). On September 24, 2006, Yangman was captured by volunteers while stealing at the Qingnian Road bus station in Wuhan. "After Yangman was captured, he provoked and insulted us. Xiaofeng hit Yang's legs and arms with a swing stick. After 10 minutes, the police took the captured person away. Yangman was taken to the hospital for treatment at that time Special examination and filming showed that there were no internal injuries," recalled "Lifetime" (screen name), a companion who participated in the anti-pocketing activities.

Unexpectedly, 28 days later, when Yangman was out for activities, he suddenly convulsed and became confused. He was sent to Tongji Hospital and died due to lack of treatment. According to forensic identification, it was severe subarachnoid hemorrhage and subdural hemorrhage, which led to central respiratory and circulatory failure and death.

The anti-pocket-pocketing alliance was established online by a group of young people in Wuhan. The anti-pocket-pocketing alliance has carried out dozens of anti-pocket-pocketing activities. In July, a website named Wuhan Volunteer Alliance was built. The anti-pocketing campaign reached its climax.

According to reports, members of the anti-pocket-pocketing alliance pay for their own transportation and some self-defense equipment without receiving any compensation. They usually deal with thieves who are stealing by driving them away or capturing them on the spot, and then transfer the captured thieves to the nearest police station.

Thieves in Wuhan are very rampant, stealing in gangs in broad daylight, and many citizens are too frightened to stop them. What we want to do is to gather a sense of righteousness and prevent thieves from being too presumptuous. A member of the anti-pocket-pocketing alliance who goes by the online name "Scalpel" said this.

Due to Xiao Feng’s arrest, the anti-pocket-pocketing alliance recently stopped its anti-pocket-pocketing activities. Everyone is waiting for the investigation results of the case. At the same time, many thoughts have arisen about the status of the anti-pocket-pocketing alliance and related issues.

One opinion is that the anti-pocketing alliance is an unregistered association and its activities are illegal. Some people also believe that the private sector can voluntarily organize an alliance to combat "pickpockets" and openly fight against lawbreakers regardless of fame or fortune. This is not only legal, but also a courageous citizen spirit.

It is understood that the anti-pocketing alliance once proposed technical guidance to the public security organs, but the police did not agree. When someone proposed to ban the anti-pocketing alliance and ban its activities, the police did not adopt it. "There is indeed some complexity here! We will not express our views, and we will not come forward to stop the anti-pocket alliance." said a person from the Wuhan Public Security Bureau.

Combating illegal crimes is the responsibility and power given by the law to the public security organs. Are the activities of the anti-pocketing alliance legal? This issue is also controversial. Wuhan lawyer Ren Xunxiang believes that when anyone exercises their rights, even if it is to safeguard social justice, they must do so within the limits of the law. When maintaining social order, legality must be used against illegality, and illegality must not be used against illegality. Another lawyer, Zhou Jingwen, believes that any ordinary citizen, when he sees someone stealing, has the right and obligation to stop him and try to transfer him to the public security organ.

Debates are debates, but most people still believe that the anti-pocketing alliance should be recognized as legitimate. Because the law does not prohibit citizens from forming groups to fight against pickpocketing, it should not be considered illegal.

Chen Huizhong, associate professor of the Department of Sociology at Huazhong University of Science and Technology, believes that the emergence of these civil groups shows that they still have certain social needs. These volunteers with a strong sense of social responsibility should be encouraged to serve the society better and more. People now question the Wuhan Anti-Pocketing Alliance because there is no good guidance mechanism. If possible, relevant departments can make the best use of the situation and provide them with relevant training. The combined force will be greater than imagined.

7. The female driver slapped the female highway toll collector and said she would challenge the law: Late at night on the 25th and early morning on the 26th, a female driver driving a Dongfeng Honda sedan made a scene at the Guangzhou Baiyun Airport Expressway Toll Station. During this period, she not only took out the front lock and warning sign and smashed the toll booth, but also shouted "I want to challenge the law" and slapped Xiaolan, the toll collector of the fifth toll lane, in full view of the public. On May 8, with the persuasion and mediation of the public security department, the female driver came to the airport expressway toll station again to apologize to Xiao Lan. However, the female driver still looked arrogant. This made Xiaolan and other toll collectors very angry. The reporter learned from the Airport Public Security Bureau that the female driver who caused the trouble and hit others was more sincere and willing to come to apologize during the mediation and admonishment process of the public security department. Therefore, she was not sentenced to administrative detention, but was instead given an administrative penalty of 200 yuan. Currently, the case is being submitted for approval. . At 11:55 pm on April 25, the female driver made things difficult for the female toll collector twice. “When that car drove over, I had a feeling that something was going to happen.

"Recalling that vicious incident, the toll collector Xiaolan looked sad. She told reporters that the female driver's car rushed through the toll window at that time. "I reached out to pick up the card, but she didn't make any movement. Normally I would She said, "Miss, please hand over the card," but her eyes were very sharp, and I was frightened after just one glance, so I had to bend down and stretch my hand as hard as I could to reach for her card. "After more than a minute of hard work, Xiao Lan took the Yuetong card from the female driver. After swiping the card, just when Xiao Lan was about to return the card to the female driver, the female driver started the accelerator, "She turned the car again. I drove a little further, so that I was further away from the toll station. Station leader Zeng, who witnessed the whole incident, told reporters that in order to return the card to the female driver, Xiaolan once again leaned over and put the card in her hand, "But she didn't drive away, but He started to curse. "The female driver was very emotional. Not only did her curse words become more and more unpleasant, but she also rushed out of the car and stood in front of the toll station window, gesticulating and cursing more and more fiercely. Xiao Lan, who only had one year of work experience, was frightened and hurriedly 8. The "June 30 Drunk Driving Incident" in Nanjing leads to reflection. The "June 30 Drunk Driving Incident" in Nanjing leads to reflection. The law should no longer forgive: Drunk driving on June 30. Five Dead and Four Injured On the afternoon of August 19, 2009, when the author was questioning the witnesses of the drunken driving accident in Nanjing on June 30, which resulted in five deaths and four injuries, Li, a melon farmer selling melons on Jinsheng Road, Jiangning District, Nanjing City, Hong was still frightened, and her tears couldn't help but fall down: "It's so tragic! The drunk driver who caused the accident should be imprisoned for the rest of his life. "At 8:20 pm on June 30, 2009, Li Hong was setting up a watermelon stall on the roadside as usual. Suddenly, a black Buick car with the license plate Su ATH900 crashed into her from south to north like a wild horse. With a "boom", a garbage truck was knocked away and hit the melon stall. Her forehead was injured and blood flowed. Li Hong saw that the car continued to rush forward and hit two cars parked on the roadside. Glass was scattered all over the floor. Then, the out-of-control car hit a couple walking. The man was knocked into a van on the side of the road, and the woman was knocked into another car. The woman was 7 months pregnant. The pre-term baby was knocked out... Passers-by who witnessed the tragic scene shouted to the driver to stop, but the car continued to rush forward and hit a parked sedan on the roadside. The trunk of the car was knocked into the car. , the knocked-off left tire was rolling wildly on the road... The car sped past the entrance of a supermarket, and a young couple who had just come out of the supermarket for shopping were hit... After a series of accidents, the car still did not stop and continued to drive towards Speeding north. Angry citizens ran and shouted, "Catch him! Chase him!" A passing taxi driver chased the vehicle. After a while, the taxi driver noticed white smoke coming from the engine of the vehicle. The speed slowed down and he quickly stopped his car in front of the accident car. After getting out of the car, the taxi driver found that all the airbags in the accident car were deployed, the front cover of the car was severely damaged, and the driver was lying on the steering wheel without saying a word. When the police arrived after hearing the news, they couldn't help crying when they saw the bloody scene. Li Hong said that she learned from the public security department that night that the vehicle involved in the accident knocked down 9 passers-by and damaged 6 parked cars. Three people died on the way to the hospital, and two people died after being rescued at the hospital. The other four injured were treated at Jiangning District Hospital. After the police took control of the driver, they found that he smelled of alcohol. A blood test showed that the driver had alcohol in his blood. The content is 381 milligrams per 100 milliliters. According to the law, adults are considered drunk if they have 80 milligrams per 100 milliliters. The driver involved in the accident, Zhang Mingbao, 43 years old, the person in charge of the individual construction team, confessed during the interrogation: That night, he made an appointment with several clients to have dinner at a restaurant on Jinsheng Road. After the meal, he drove home. After drinking too much, Zhang Mingbao lost control of the vehicle and realized he had hit the road. When questioned by the police, his voice was trembling and his eyes were red. He repeatedly stated that he would sell his house and car and do his best to compensate the families of the deceased and the injured. The police criminally detained Zhang Mingbao the next day.

9. The families of two teenagers who drowned in an illegal sand mining site in Hepu will seek legal compensation: On July 20, the families of two children who drowned in Fanggang Village, Xichang Town, Hepu told reporters that they decided to seek legal compensation. Ways to claim compensation from the battlefield owner. On the afternoon of July 13, their child unfortunately drowned while swimming in an illegal sand quarry. According to Ms. Huang, a villager in Fangang Village, Xichang Town, on the afternoon of July 13, the two brothers Xiaonan (8 years old) and Xiaowen (13 years old) from the village and their cousin Xiaoxiong (14 years old) went to the village together not far from the village. They played on the shore of the Shoulang River, and then went to swim and play in the water at the sand quarry in operation. Unexpectedly, just after a while, they sank into the water. Xiaonan was lifted out of the water by her brother Xiaowen and shouted for help. She was rescued by several workers on the sand pumping boat nearby, but Xiaowen and Xiaoxiong died unfortunately. Villagers told reporters that after the bodies of the two teenagers were recovered, because the family and the owner of the sand quarry failed to reach an agreement on compensation, the family found large blocks of ice and applied them around the bodies of the children, and the bodies were kept at the site of the accident for three days. The family members of the deceased complained that before sand mining, the water in the Limugang River was less than one meter deep, and you could cross the river directly by rolling up your trousers. However, the sand mining at the sand quarry now makes the bottom of the river uneven, with many deep pits of nearly ten meters appearing. There are no protective measures or signs warning against swimming near the sand mining site. They believe that the occurrence of this tragedy has a direct causal link with the sand quarry, and the owner of the sand quarry bears unshirkable responsibility. They also learned that the sand quarry had been open for more than a year but did not hold a mining license. Pei, the owner of the sand quarry, said that before the accident, the sand quarry workers at the site warned the three children many times not to swim here, but they ignored them. When something happened to the child, the three workers who were mining sand actively rescued her. After rescuing Xiaonan ashore, they continued to dive into the water to search and rescue the two children. "The two children who drowned were both minors. When the children went out to have trouble, the guardians had unshirkable responsibilities." After the accident, the Xichang Town Government of Hepu County attached great importance to it and summoned the family members of the deceased and the police on the afternoon of the 15th. The owner of the battlefield held a mediation meeting. The parents of the deceased believe that the sand quarry should pay a one-time compensation of 150,000 yuan to the family of the two children, plus 20,000 yuan for burial expenses. The owner of the sand quarry believes that he has fulfilled his responsibility. Out of humanitarianism, he is only willing to pay 8,000 yuan for the funeral expenses. On the 16th, two drowned teenagers were buried after three days of morgue. On the 20th, the family of the deceased told reporters that they had hired a lawyer and would seek compensation from the sand quarry through legal channels.

10. Several property owners were visited by thieves who left action codes outside their homes: The crime occurred: Posing as a decoration worker to steal at around 5:40 pm on the 12th, the security guard of Shangshangju Community in Lishuwan, Shapingba District Squad leader Zhao Bin patrolled to the elevator entrance downstairs in Building B. "Catch the thief!" Suddenly, an owner on the 13th floor stuck his head out from the balcony and shouted for help. Zhao Bin blocked the elevator entrance on the ground floor, used a walkie-talkie to call in two patrolling security guards, and assigned another security guard to guard the elevator entrance on the negative floor. The security guards were quickly in place, and another group of security guards followed the stairs of Building B, searching upwards floor by floor. After a while, the elevator door on the ground floor opened, and a middle-aged man in red with a panicked expression walked out. Zhao Bin stepped forward to ask for his identity. The man said that he was a decoration worker for the owner named Zhang on the 21st floor. After finishing speaking, he took out a business card of a home improvement company and lit a cigarette. "What is the owner's name? How can I contact him?" When asked, the man could only tell the owner's name but did not know his contact number. "He ran to my house and stole the computer!" The owner who called for help on the 13th floor rushed over and immediately recognized the man as the thief. The owner surnamed Zhang on the 21st floor also rushed back after receiving a notice from property management and confirmed that the man was not her home decoration worker. The owners who came after hearing the news were very angry and rushed to "interrogate" the man. The man finally confessed that he had stolen a laptop and hid it in a hidden place in the corridor on the fifth floor. Under his guidance, the security guard found the stolen computer. The man was handed over to the police station. Investigation: A mysterious symbol was found outside the door. Where did the thieves get the courage to break into a house in broad daylight? According to Mr. Zhang, the owner of Building B, when faced with the owner's "interrogation", the thief revealed an important piece of information - the accomplices had been visiting the community for two or three days, and based on which homes were unoccupied during the day and which homes were unoccupied at night, they were placed in A mark was left outside the home.

Yesterday, Chen Guangxu, manager of Chongqing Shangshangju Property Development Co., Ltd., said that after the incident, security personnel stepped up patrols and discovered 7 mysterious symbols on the 13th floor of Building B and adjacent floors - 4 of which were from It consists of "+" and "-" and is mostly painted on the wall outside the security door. In another three places, only an "A" was painted on the outside of the door. After being led by security guards, the reporter saw a wall with this symbol painted on it. The mysterious symbol is only about 1 meter above the ground and is generally difficult to spot. The security guard said that the arrangement of these symbols has a certain pattern. Some have "+" at the top and "-" at the bottom; some have "-" at the top and "+" at the bottom. What do the different arrangements mean? The security guard didn't know much either. After discussion, the owner group of Shang Shang Ju provided an explanation for the mysterious symbols: "+" on top and "-" on the bottom, which means there are people in the owner's home during the day and no one at night; "-" on top and "+" on the bottom, which means it is daytime No one, there is someone at night. An owner who did not want to be named said: "I checked the news about thieves on the Internet. This kind of symbol has also been found in other cities in China. The public security agency later confirmed that it is a new trend in burglary." Reminder: Strange marks are timely. Clear reporters learned from the police yesterday that the thief, whose surname is Yuan, is 46 years old and is from Zhong County. He has a criminal record of burglary and is currently under criminal detention. The police said further investigation was needed into the matter where the thieves left secret codes. The police remind the public based on the cases they have uncovered: Some thieves will pretend to be promoters handing out advertising flyers or claim to be renovating for the owners and sneak into the community to visit. The usual method is to insert advertising flyers on the door handles of the owners, and then return to observe after two or three days. If the advertising flyer has not been removed, it is judged that no one is in the room recently, and then a large number of burglaries are carried out. It is worth mentioning that random drawings or symbols that ordinary people cannot understand on the door or the door frame are similar to the principle of inserting advertising flyers - if no one cleans them for several days, thieves will think that there is no one in the room, and theft will be carried out. It can happen. The police believe that if citizens find foreign objects inserted in the door or strange symbols painted on the door, they should remove it immediately regardless of the perspective of cleaning or anti-theft. Residents of Building 92, Shabei Street, Shapingba District have been worried for two months after discovering a thief's code. Yesterday, residents of Building 92, Shabei Street, Shapingba District, said that they had also discovered a mysterious code in the building, and thieves came soon after. It turned out that in the corridor between the 5th and 6th floors of the building, the words "There is a dog, 11.18" were written on the stairs. A resident who lives on the fifth floor of Unit 2 of the building said that on November 18 last year, when he came home from get off work, he saw the word "dog" written on it. A few days later, some residents reported that they heard strange noises in the corridor late at night, and when they opened the door, they saw a dark figure running downstairs in panic. After that, because police cars often stopped downstairs, the strange noises and black shadows never happened again. Residents speculated that "there are dogs" means that those upstairs are not allowed to steal, and if they want to steal, they can steal from those downstairs. After discovering the thief's password, some residents changed the password locks to prevent theft, and some residents on the top floors simply made their own iron fences to seal off the entire corridor. "The discovery of the thief's password has made us worried for nearly two months." Mr. Zhu on the 6th floor said that residents are still worried - maybe that day, there will be unintelligible words or symbols in the building.

Personal opinion: Many people ask questions online like you. Instead of getting an answer that is the same as others, it is better to read through eight political books. ^ ^