After a grease factory in Heilongjiang was reported, the director's son killed the informant with a car. What happened afterwards?

Because the factory director's son killed the reporter, he was sentenced to death in the first instance, but the factory director's son refused to accept the appeal. Finally, the court sentenced the factory director's son to life imprisonment, which seemed to be a happy ending. The reason why the director's son refused to accept the appeal was that he killed the reporter in order to protect his parents from being bullied by the reporter. He just stepped on the accelerator on impulse and killed the reporter, not because he intentionally killed the reporter. However, in my opinion, this is an out-and-out intentional homicide. After not killing the reporter for the first time, continue to step on the gas pedal and shout "Kill him". Obviously, he did it on purpose. However, the response given by the court is that there is no substantial evidence for the factory director's son's intentional homicide, which does not mean that the death penalty was changed to life imprisonment because of intentional homicide. The family members of the deceased are definitely unwilling to deal with this result, or continue to call for justice for the deceased.

Event carding: Some people in Heilongjiang reported that grain, oil and rice companies and oil plants were reselling aged grain, saying that they had done unnatural things to make money. After the report, the reporter followed up the shooting evidence, but he did not expect to be retaliated by the two companies. In the process of filming evidence, I was punched and kicked by the other party. He tried to escape and was knocked down by the director's son. Others took out their tools and beat up reporters. During this period, the factory director's son continued to step on the accelerator, and the reporter was killed. In addition, colleagues who accompanied the whistleblower in filming evidence were also beaten in various ways, all of whom were injured to varying degrees. The victim's family directly chose to call the police, and the final result did not satisfy them.

0 1, reselling old rice itself is wrong. The boss behind the grain and oil company is related to the oil factory company. Reporter Liu Gang found out that both bosses are doing illegal things in secret. If there is something wrong with their old rice, it will do great harm to users' health. There are also relevant laws that require food sales to be qualified. If not, it's illegal. So Liu and his brother have been secretly investigating this matter. It is not that they have not reported it to the relevant departments before, but they have never responded. The report was like a stone, and there was no response. Liu and others also speculated that someone might have been bought. The report will never be answered, and the report will be known by the two bosses. They began to be cautious, and Liu's repeated tracking was fruitless.

02. Intentional killing is said to protect parents. Liu got the news that two bosses would gather in the factory to resell Chen Hualiang. Liu immediately reported to the relevant departments and took several brothers to shoot the evidence together, and the relevant departments gave him a reply. Liu and others did see two bosses coming and going, so they stopped them. In the process of stopping, physical contact occurred. The director's son drove straight over and killed Liu. Afterwards, he also said that he saw too many people and wanted to disperse them, also for his parents not to be bullied by Liu and others. This explanation is simply ridiculous. No more than ten people were present. You should get off the bus to stop someone from having a physical conflict and protect your parents, instead of hitting someone casually and killing the informant. Why not just bump into your parents? Obviously, it is knowing that Liu is not good to himself that he will kill him in this way. It's really vicious

Now the family of the deceased is still sentencing the factory director's son to death in the court of appeal. They are not satisfied with the result of life imprisonment. I hope the law can give justice to the deceased and let everyone know the existence of justice.