There are rumors that a primary school teacher in Guangzhou physically punished an asthmatic child by running 10 laps on the playground, causing him to vomit blood. What do you think?

First of all, thank you for your invitation. I have carefully read the story of this incident. The following is my humble opinion. Please correct me if there is any inappropriateness.

Judging from the results, the child’s life was in serious crisis. This is something neither parents nor teachers want to see.

Analysis from the teacher's perspective:

Analysis from the parent's perspective:

Parents bribed teachers 60,000 yuan, hoping that teachers would "take more care" of themselves child. The teacher also accepted it. A de facto violation has occurred.

Parents and teachers ignore the law and fail to set good examples for their children.

Teachers who cannot be role models are like a fish in the education field.

As for why teachers punish students corporally, I have not seen it

and cannot make any comments. But asking a child to run 10 laps is too much.

The above are some of my personal opinions. Hope for more advice.

Recently, a mother broke the news on the Internet that Liu, the deputy head teacher and Chinese teacher of Class 5, Grade 1, Fangyuan Experimental Primary School in Guangzhou, physically punished a 6-year-old asthmatic child by making him run 10 laps on the playground, causing him to vomit blood and rescue him.

The mother told Liu many times that her child had asthma and could not exercise strenuously, but she was still punished corporally by Liu. Moreover, the corporal punishment was very severe. Liu asked a six-year-old child to run ten laps in the bright sun around three o'clock in the afternoon.

Parents said that after the corporal punishment ended, the child's mental state was not good. Later, he was taken to the hospital. He vomited a lot of blood in the car and had difficulty breathing. Due to nerve damage caused by high fever, the sequelae of trembling hands are left. The child was a violin playing expert before and has reached the level of violin 8th grade.

Some netizens questioned the blood stains on the children’s clothes and believed that the parents were exaggerating. The mother also mentioned that she once gave Liu 60,000 yuan in care fees in order to let Liu take more care of the child. During this period, she also gave her many high-end gifts. However, she did not expect that Liu would take care of the child in this way. Regardless of whether there is a discrepancy in what the parents said or whether they exaggerated certain facts, there is no doubt that the teacher physically punished the student because the medical certificate did say that the vomiting was bloodshot and accompanied by asthma.

Since the incident, Liu has not apologized to his parents and children, nor offered any compensation. He still stands on the podium and teaches as if nothing is wrong. He is simply crazy. This matter has been accepted by the police after the news broke, and the specific situation is still under investigation.

Many parents trust teachers and hope that strict discipline will be good for their children. But strictness cannot be at the expense of harming children. There are many ways to be strict, not just corporal punishment. What's more, corporal punishment of children with asthma is irresponsible to the child's body and is not the purpose of education.

In real life, it is not uncommon for teachers to physically punish students. Many parents grew up like this. There are not many children who have never been spanked by teachers, especially boys.

However, legally speaking, corporal punishment of children is indeed illegal. Article 27 of the "Compulsory Education Law of the People's Republic of China (2018 Amendment)" and Article 21 of the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Minors (2012 Amendment)" both have express provisions. "Students are not allowed to be subjected to corporal punishment, disguised corporal punishment or other behaviors that insult human dignity."

Liu claimed that he only let his child run one lap, but the parents claimed that the monitoring showed that it was 10 laps. It is said that because Liu was in a bad mood that day, he was punished for a while longer. The 10 laps of exercise exceeded the physical endurance of the children. Parents said that several children fell to their knees after being punished by Liu and were out of breath from exhaustion. If this matter is true, Liu is in vain to be a teacher by using his own mood to intensify the punishment.

There are many kinds of education methods, corporal punishment is the simplest and crudest one, and it is also the lowest one. It does not require skills or understanding of the child's psychology. It can be done with a stick. There are also many teachers who use "teaching aids" such as books, chalk, hands, and feet according to local conditions. Even penalty laps, squats, etc.

There is no denying that corporal punishment can have a deterrent effect, but this method comes at the cost of harming the child's body and mind. The most ideal educational effect is to make students realize their mistakes, correct them, and be grateful to the teacher instead of hating them.

When educating children, you need to first consider their acceptance effects and choose educational methods accordingly, rather than just to maintain your own authority and vent your emotions.

If a teacher only uses corporal punishment to strictly control children and does not know other methods, I think this teacher is really not qualified to be a role model. Moreover, as a teacher who collects benefits from parents, he should be investigated and punished as soon as possible and his educational qualifications revoked.

The teacher’s behavior in this question is far from being a punishment. It is an act of malicious oppression and venting.

I am a teacher and I also agree that the teaching profession is a noble profession. But I also believe that not all teachers are noble, and there are many who are not worthy of being teachers!

Recently, a mother broke the news on the Internet that Liu Yan, the deputy head teacher and Chinese teacher of Class 5 of the first grade of Guangzhou Fangyuan Experimental Primary School, physically punished a 6-year-old asthmatic child by making him run 10 laps on the playground, causing him to vomit blood and rescue him.

According to the mother, she told the class teacher Liu Yan many times that her child has asthma and cannot exercise strenuously. In order for Liu Yan to take care of her children, the mother also gave Liu Yan 60,000 yuan in care fees and also gave her many high-end gifts.

However, the head teacher Liu Yan did not care about the child's physical condition and still punished the child corporally, and it was extremely intense corporal punishment, making the child run 10 times around the place.

The reason for the corporal punishment was that the child was wearing an accessory on his chest. The head teacher Liu Yan asked the child’s mother, and the mother said it was an instrument used to diagnose the child’s heart rate. Maybe Liu Yan still doesn't believe it.

Perhaps it was the parents who sent Liu Yan huge sums of money, which made Liu Yan mistakenly believe that the parents just wanted her to take care of their children, and that the child's illness was an excuse.

But even for healthy children, this corporal punishment is extremely inhumane.

I don’t know how big their school’s playground is, but most schools have standard playgrounds with a track circumference of 400 meters.

In our high school student sports meeting, 1500 meters is a long-distance running event. Many students who signed up gave up midway and could not finish the race. There are only less than 4 laps of 1500 meters. As you can imagine, asking a 6-year-old girl to run 10 laps is simply inhumane.

After the corporal punishment, the child's mental state was not good. Later, he was taken to the hospital. He vomited a lot of blood in the car and had difficulty breathing. High fever causes nerve damage, leaving sequelae of trembling hands.

According to her mother, Liu Yan has not paid any compensation since the incident occurred on December 10 last year, and has not even apologized to her parents and children. The mother had no choice but to expose the incident online.

After the news broke, the police have accepted the case. The specific situation is still under investigation.

After this incident happened, parents asked the school for an explanation. The school's dean of academic affairs claimed that Teacher Liu was in a bad mood at the time and had already criticized Teacher Liu.

It can be seen that in the management philosophy of this school, corporal punishment is normal. The child has such a big problem. As a school, it doesn't care about the child. It just tells the parents that they have criticized the teacher.

Is this the attitude a school that educates people should have?

Later, the school surveillance video showed that while Liu Yan was punishing the students by running 10 laps, she sat under the shade of a tree to enjoy the shade and supervised them. After the child ran 7 laps, he stopped running no longer. Liu Yan asked the child to continue running, and the child ran three more laps.

After this incident, Liu Yan not only refused to repent, but also took the initiative to admit her mistake and apologize. On May 27 this year, he also beat the child's mother, injuring her, and warned the child's mother not to let it go on forever.

According to Liu Yan, does it mean that the mother of the child is making trouble unreasonably? What does it mean to be endless? After a client commits a crime, he shows no sign of remorse and instead accuses the victim of being unreasonable? When you become a class teacher, do you really feel superior and look down on all living beings?

The foundation of education should be people-oriented. At present, many schools ignore the physical and psychological feelings of students, focus on pursuing results, and often use corporal punishment.

This has seriously deviated from the essence of education.

Recently, after the start of school, many student suicides have surfaced on the Internet. This is closely related to the fact that schools pay close attention to academic performance and ignore students’ psychological endurance.

Some people always say that today’s students are too fragile. This is something that people who say these things have not experienced sitting in school.

Now students sit in the classroom all day long and cannot move. If he makes the slightest move, he will say that the student is in violation of discipline. In high school, students sit in the classroom for at least 10 hours a day, every day.

As a teacher, I also believe that this method of ignoring the laws of students' physical and mental development and strictly controlling students' performance is at the expense of harming students' physical and mental health and is not advisable.

Under this performance-oriented education model, it is not uncommon to report incidents of corporal punishment of students. But this is just the tip of the iceberg, and there are countless more that have not been reported.

Punishment is definitely not education.

First of all, punishment is the teacher's way of venting his or her own grievances. Just imagine, if the teacher's heart is peaceful, will the teacher punish the students corporally?

Secondly, the punishment is because the teacher himself is unwilling to spend energy educating the students in order to save trouble and effort, which is a manifestation of the lack of care for the students. Rough corporal punishment was used to simplify the education process. Just imagine, if the teacher loves the students and sincerely educates the students, will the teacher still punish the students corporally?

Finally, corporal punishment is a sign of the teacher’s inability to educate. If the teacher has a deep understanding of educational psychology theory, understands students’ psychological development patterns, and understands students’ needs and confusions. Corresponding methods will be used to resolve students' confusions and conflicts. Where is the need for punishment? Punishment is a substitute for education after the teacher has no choice but to do anything to the students.

Although the state explicitly prohibits punishing students. However, national laws cannot prohibit people who have no love and ability from entering the teaching ranks.

Therefore, my country’s normal school admissions will need to add an interview link, and normal school students will also need to add a process evaluation link on the university campus. Teachers also need to add behavioral assessment links to the teaching process. On the contrary, there should be less suppression of teacher evaluation.

Unqualified teachers should be eliminated from the teaching staff.

This is an ignorant teacher who does not understand science! It means that the teachers recruited by the school are not qualified! It may even mean that there is insider trading behind this recruitment. In short, it is caused by the unqualified teacher!

Nowadays, a small number of our teachers are ill and need to be treated, otherwise it will only harm more children.

The incident occurred at Fangyuan Experimental Primary School in Guangzhou. The teacher surnamed Liu was the child's deputy head teacher and Chinese teacher. Although he knew that the child had asthma, he still physically punished the child by running 10 laps around the playground.

Judging from the teacher’s behavior and the communication between her parents and her, we can see that she not only has psychological problems but is also ignorant.

Knowing that the child is sick, the parents still punish the student corporally even though the parents say hello many times. If this is not a disease, then what is it? If you don’t take care of your children, aren’t you afraid of the risks you may face?

This may not only cause physical and mental harm to the child, but may also deprive yourself of food. But she was not afraid, and according to reports, this was not the first time that the student was punished corporally.

To say that she is ignorant is because she has no idea from her words and deeds that an asthma attack can be dangerous if it is not intervened in time.

So she punishes her children corporally, so she doesn’t even allow parents to bring a sensor device to their children. The reason is that the school does not allow children to wear accessories and cannot make children different. He even said he didn’t trust the teacher.

How can you trust such a teacher? Now that the child has been seriously injured, his job will definitely be lost.

Coincidentally, I saw an equally infuriating piece of news yesterday.

A teacher from a private school in Puning, Guangdong, actually used compasses to prick different parts of some students who had not completed their homework as punishment, causing more than 40 students to suffer varying degrees of injuries!

This is not corporal punishment, this is a crime.

Therefore, for this type of incident, please do not include it in the discussion of ordinary incidents of teachers corporally punishing students.

This is how people with psychological problems infiltrate the teaching staff.

A primary school teacher in Guangzhou physically punished an asthmatic child by running 10 laps on the playground, causing him to vomit blood. What's going on? Let’s sort it out first. The incident was revealed by the child’s mother. Recently, a mother broke the news on the Internet that Liu, the deputy head teacher and Chinese teacher of Class 5, Grade 1, Fangyuan Experimental Primary School in Guangzhou, physically punished her 6-year-old daughter, making her run ten laps on the playground before vomiting blood and rescuing her.

My mother said that this is a huge football playground, and adults can’t stand even one lap. The teacher, Liu, knew that the six-year-old child had asthma and could not exercise strenuously, but he still punished the child by running ten laps in the bright sun around three o'clock in the afternoon.

The child was in poor mental condition after returning home that day, and was later taken to the hospital by his family. The child vomited a lot of blood in the car, had difficulty breathing, and had a high fever. Although the child was rescued, the high fever caused nerve damage and left the sequelae of trembling hands. The child will no longer be able to play his favorite violin as well as before.

Children need education, but students cannot be punished corporally. Article 27 of the "Compulsory Education Law of the People's Republic of China (2018 Amendment)" and Article 21 of the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Minors (2012 Amendment)" both have express provisions. "Students are not allowed to be subjected to corporal punishment, disguised corporal punishment, or other behaviors that insult human dignity."

Teacher Liu accepted the gift, knowing that the child had asthma and could not engage in strenuous exercise, and still punished the student corporally anger. It has been so long since the incident, but the teacher has not apologized and the school has not given an explanation, which is also outrageous. Fortunately, after the incident was revealed, the local education bureau has now intervened. I hope the relevant departments will not protect their own shortcomings and severely punish this teacher for accepting gifts and corporal punishment.

I was extremely angry yesterday, but today the latest report came again, and this matter has actually been reversed. Guangzhou Baiyun Public Security Bureau issued a notice with the following general contents: 1. The parents vomited blood due to corporal punishment, were threatened and beaten by the teacher at 2 a.m., and gave the teacher 60,000 yuan. These are all lies deliberately fabricated by the parents; 2. The relevant medical records for asthma diagnosis cannot be provided; 3. Suspected of hiring people for online hype.

The fact that the blood stains that make us sympathize is actually lotion makes people speechless. Teachers should report corporal punishment, but it’s wrong to make up lies like this. Who will believe you in the future? Everyone, please leave the team alone and wait for the investigation.

Putting aside the special condition that the child has asthma, just punishing the child with ten laps of running shows that there is something wrong with the teacher's education method.

Children come to school first to receive education. For a first-grade student, transitioning from kindergarten or preschool to first grade may still be somewhat uncomfortable. Some children even They are not very disciplined, but these cannot be used as reasons for teachers to punish students.

The playground in regular primary schools is a 400-meter track. A 6-year-old child can run ten laps. I want to ask this teacher, can you run ten laps yourself?

The child’s parents told the teacher that their child had asthma since the beginning of school. The child’s parents carried a detector for the child, but the teacher’s reply was, don’t be special, a little The advanced detection equipment can send out a signal when a child is sick, so that the child can receive timely treatment. I would like to ask why special situations cannot be treated specially? When a child wears a detector, it becomes a distrust of the teacher. How confident are you that you can help the child in time when he gets sick?

I wonder if this teacher has children at home, and whether he can understand the worries of parents when their children are sick. I really wish I was the one who got sick, and don't let my children get sick.

Half a year had passed when the child's parents posted. The child had sequelae after being forced to run to rescue her. What did she do wrong for such a young child to face the dangers of society so early? After the school teacher explained that their children were doing something special by wearing a detector, they chose to compromise and did not wear it. After their children fell ill and were hospitalized, they had no way to protect their rights. If such a thing is true, it can only be said to be terrible.

We cannot protect our children all the time, but at least we must tell our children that whenever their lives are threatened, no matter who the person is, they should no longer compromise and obey.

Working mothers come to answer questions. I understand this mother particularly well. If it were me, I would be tempted to rip off this teacher.

This morning (May 30), Weibo netizen @小岛里的大海 posted a long article, reflecting that a teacher at Fangyuan Experimental Primary School in Guangzhou was suspected of corporally punishing students, triggering heated discussions among netizens, including #广州 Topics such as City Fangyuan Experimental Primary School##Liuyan# have been in the hot search content.

The cause of the incident was that the 6-year-old daughter of netizen @小岛里的大海 was corporally punished by her first-grade teacher who knew she had asthma and ran ten laps on the playground. She vomited blood and was sent to the hospital for emergency treatment. She had a high fever for many days and left sequelae. After half a year of safeguarding her rights, there was no result, and she was even threatened by the teacher during the process.

my country's "Compulsory Education Law", "Teacher Law", and "Minor Protection Law" all expressly prohibit corporal punishment or disguised corporal punishment of students. The third article of the newly issued "Code of Professional Ethics for Primary and Secondary School Teachers" also has clear text provisions: Love students. Care and care for all students, respect students' personality, and treat students equally and fairly. Be strict and kind to students and be a good teacher and helpful friend to them. Protect students' safety, safeguard students' legitimate rights and interests, and promote students' comprehensive, proactive and healthy development. No sarcasm, sarcasm, or discrimination against students, no corporal punishment or disguised corporal punishment.

Not to mention that this incident caused the child to vomit blood, be hospitalized for several months, and damage the nerves in his right hand. The corporal punishment law alone is not allowed. This teacher did something wrong from the beginning. , after the incident, faced with the parents' rights protection, and threatened the parents, it is really in vain to be a teacher.

When I saw this news, I thought about how my deskmate in junior high school was humiliated. In the second grade of junior high school, my deskmate was a beautiful girl who loved origami. Once in a math class, she secretly folded paper and was discovered by the teacher. Then the teacher put all the origami paper in her drawer into her hair, and while inserting it back, he said: "You dress up like a monster at a young age, it's not a good thing at first glance." Later, her deskmate transferred to another school. That was the first time I saw that a teacher could humiliate students in this way. A teacher's responsibility is to teach and educate people. He does not expect to cultivate students into talents, but please don't hurt them.

Parents hope that teachers can strictly demand their children, but not at the expense of harming the children. The health and safety of the children are the prerequisite for everything. I hope that this incident can be resolved reasonably and the murderer can be punished. Severe punishment.

I was so angry when I saw this kind of thing. Teacher Liu Yan not only ruined her own career, but also ruined the possibility of a child's life.

It is said that this 6-year-old child has reached the violin level 8. She has been learning violin from a famous violinist since she was 3 years old. It has won the championship in many awards. Parents have spent a lot of money and energy on training their children to play violin.

Nowadays, the sequelae of corporal punishment left by children’s hands are trembling, which makes it impossible for the children to continue learning the piano. The violin career has been terminated. The investment in the early stage and the development that should have been brought in the later period have been wiped out. It is very frustrating. Heartache.

Liu Yanming knew that her child had asthma and was unable to engage in strenuous activities, yet she still let her child run 10 laps in the scorching sun. This was tantamount to "deliberately injuring someone."

Parents have given high-end gifts to teachers many times before, and also paid 60,000 yuan in care fees, so that their children can grow up safely. Unexpectedly, the teacher only accepts money and gifts and does not care about the children. The safety of their lives is taken seriously, and corporal punishment has long been commonplace. I don’t know how such a teacher got into the teaching force...

If such people continue to be teachers, it is a disaster for all children and parents! I hope this teacher can be severely punished!

It is right that teachers should not punish students excessively. After all, between teachers and students, in most cases, teachers are stronger. Giving teachers the right to corporally punish students could open a Pandora's box.

When students come to school to receive compulsory education but are beaten by teachers, this is not a good education method.

We often say that teachers are hard-working gardeners, and they occasionally punish children for the sake of their learning. But now this teacher Liu Yan not only collects benefits from parents, but also uses inappropriate corporal punishment because of student discipline problems, threatening students' lives and ruining their lives. It is really not advisable to give up your child’s violin dream.

Evil teachers are cultivated by cowardly parents. As a parent, you should let your children know that everyone's dignity is inviolable and no one can bully another person. Even if that person is a teacher or a class teacher, he must bravely defend his dignity. Only in this way can he learn to respect him in society in the future. others, and also gain the respect of others.

A primary school teacher in Guangzhou made a child run ten laps in the playground as a corporal punishment. This resulted in students vomiting blood due to excessive corporal punishment. The media has exposed the matter, but the final conclusion of the matter is now under investigation by the relevant departments. Therefore, the truth of the matter remains to be further ascertained.

But putting this incident aside, the relationship between teachers and students should be like this. Parents send their children to school to study, and teachers must educate the students carefully and take care of them in daily life. Set a shining example for children in their studies.

Actively guide students in daily learning. Use reasonable discipline methods to correct children's mistakes in life and study. For teachers, students should be treated with reason and affection, with persuasion and education as the main focus and family education as a supplement. Never use rough methods to treat students or punish them corporally.

In response to the incident of a teacher corporally punishing a student that broke out on the Internet, I personally feel that the parents of the students should express their demands in a reasonable and legal way and correctly state the causes and consequences of the situation. The incident has already caused a stir on the Internet, and the final outcome of the investigation remains to be seen.