When the interviewer asked, you found 50 thousand, and the owner said you lost 80 thousand. How should you answer?

The business of many excellent companies is getting busier and busier. The accountant of Xiao Zhang Company resigned because of family affairs. Xiao Zhang posted the recruitment information online, and three people came to the company to apply. But there is only one place. Of course, you must choose the best one to be competent. So the interviewer asked a question to test their adaptability.

So I asked the job seeker, if you found 50,000 yuan on the road, the boss came and said that you not only lost 50,000 yuan, but also lost 80,000 yuan. How do you handle this situation? A clear-headed candidate said he wanted to cheat me, but I wouldn't let him succeed. If he insists on saying so, I can only choose to call the police and let the police handle it.

The second candidate said that now everyone pays with WeChat and Alipay when they go out. Basically no one will bring cash. It is difficult to pick up 5 yuan on the way, let alone 50 thousand. I think it is very unlikely that this will happen. There is no need to discuss this problem at all. Third, the little girl who applied for the job said after careful consideration: In fact, this matter is very simple. I found 50 thousand yuan, but the man said he lost 80 thousand yuan Then the money I found is definitely not his. I'll give the money to the police and let them find the owner.

What is the nature of the interviewer when asking such a tricky question? This question is actually to know the comprehension ability of candidates. There is a small trap hidden in the room. From asking questions, we can know that this person is not the host, but when the interviewer asks questions, it is directly defined as the host. From the answers of these three people, we can know that the first two candidates have fallen into the trap of the interviewer. The third candidate thought for a moment and replied that she found 50,000 yuan, while the other person lost 80,000 yuan. Obviously, he didn't lose money. When the interviewer tested their comprehension ability, she got it right and was admitted directly.

The interviewer not only knows your understanding ability, but also wants to know whether you are suitable for the accounting profession. As an accountant, firstly, you should be very careful. The first candidate thought too fast. Although the second man was a little cautious, he didn't answer the question, but questioned the meaning of the question. Although we can't judge a person's character in one sentence. But he gave the interviewer the impression that he was not unable to solve the problem, but just escaping. This kind of person will do the same when he encounters problems at work.

The third candidate is very cautious. After careful consideration, she did not fall into the trap of the interviewer and directly questioned the identity of the shopkeeper. This is in line with the cautious characteristics of accountants. When we encounter some difficult problems, don't rush to answer them. We should seriously consider the nature of these problems. Then sort out what you want to say in your heart, so as to get the approval of the interviewer. As long as you do this well, you will stand out in the interview. What problems did you encounter in the previous interview? What do you think should be paid attention to? Welcome to leave a message for discussion!