After 5, years, will history textbooks be ten times as thick as they are now?

in tens of thousands of years, will history textbooks be ten times as thick?

First of all, I don't think it will. After all, the history of China has gone through so many years, and its textbooks are not very thick! Let me briefly talk about my views on history textbooks!

First of all, we have gone through such a long historical period, and the current history textbooks are not thick!

As we all know, the current textbooks are not particularly thick, and they are basically similar to the number of words, numbers and English. Therefore, I think that if they develop in this way in the future, there will not be too much content. After all, they are textbooks, not historical records!

China has gone through a history of 5, years, and it has indeed left a lot of historical records. Just historical books written by various dynasties can be piled up into mountains. Maybe it only takes more than 1, years or even less, and we can all produce very thick books!

But strangely, our history books can clearly compile history textbooks for hundreds or even thousands of years with A4 pages! This may be the difference between textbooks and historical books! Textbooks only talk about the general contents

In our history textbooks, we only talk about some overall contents, and those unimportant contents have long been abandoned by textbook writers! From the history textbooks, we can also see that our textbooks, in fact, don't have much content, but it has clearly explained the development history of China and the world, which is enough!

And those complicated and tedious things are handed over to historians to study, and they are put out for interested people to see! History education is limited. First of all, the time for education is limited.

The time we budget is fixed, and in these fixed time, we have to learn something we need to master. Therefore, the time left for history study is really not too much! For example, in primary school, we were busy with those subjects. At that time, we didn't have the subject of history. In junior high school, we only had one or two classes a week, which was really not much. In senior high school, we only studied three books and then took exams. The time we learned was related to the course selection! But on the whole, it is still not much!

isn't it the same when I think of myself? When I was in junior high school, I also studied history during class, and I didn't usually watch it. When the exam came, I crammed for the exam and got a good result. At that time, I was fun, so naturally I didn't learn! When I was in high school, I was only serious when I was in class. I usually had to deal with three major subjects, but now I am in college. I do other things when I have time, and I rarely have time to take out a book to read! There are not many courses!

So we have relatively little time to study history!

A history teacher is incapable of telling the whole history.

We have gone through hundreds or even thousands of years of history, which is already very thick. It is completely impossible to say who can record and tell it all. Therefore, it is even more impossible to wait until 5, years later! Speaking of which, in fact, we should be clear about what we study history for.

Our history is definitely not a simple study of historical content, nor is it a study of all historical content, but a study of key historical events and the whole historical context! This is the initial history study! When our ability is enough, we will learn historical analysis and historical thinking. Of course, these are not particularly easy. They are based on the accumulation of historical knowledge. If there is no early accumulation, there can be no later analysis!

Therefore, we really don't have a lot of historical content to learn, just grasp the key points!

Similarly, even if we have a history of 5, years, it is still the same. Our books are relatively simple, because they are textbooks. We only need to rely on the whole historical context, make it clear, and then use this historical knowledge to analyze historical events! Summarize the historical experience! You really don't need so much information, just typical examples and church methods!

On the other hand, when we take the exam, we actually dig up materials from somewhere, which are very novel, but those analytical methods and basic historical contents need to be used, which is history learning! My conclusion

In fact, learning history is not all the events in history, but the key events in history. It is enough to grasp the key direction and context, and then learn historical analysis methods and historical thinking!

The thickness of history textbooks is mainly related to values, choices, students' acceptance and curriculum setting.

The history textbook after 5, years will certainly not be ten times thicker than it is now, and most likely it will be about the same.

history has always been thick today and thin ancient times. Contemporary people pay the most attention to contemporary historiography, while the previous ones are relatively brief.

Just like we are studying national history at present, although it is only 7 or 8 years, it is a relatively short dynasty in ancient times at best, but its thickness is definitely much higher than before.

it was the same in the Republic of China, and the history of that era was characterized by thick textbooks.

In the past, one lesson in a dynasty, if the Chinese history was magnified ten times, it would take 5, years. Then, it is very likely that it is not a dynasty, but a social system, such as primitive society, slave society, feudal society, semi-colonial feudal society, socialist society, etc., which are all shortened to only one class.

At present, our colorful historical events and long-winded comments can only be summed up in one sentence: "This is the best era, and it is also the worst era" or "This is a man with mixed reputation". Tang Zong Song Zu, Qin Huang Hanwu also mentioned a natural passage, and the conclusion is that they have made different degrees of contributions to the establishment and perfection of the feudal system in China.

I can't imagine what this land will look like in 5, years, and I really can't imagine it.

Just like more than 2,2 years ago, Qin Shihuang in the era of cold weapons never imagined that the war would become what it is today. In his mind, the ideal society must be empty, with the same books and cars on the same track, or the Great Wall prancing.

but it is also a good choice to think about it.

No, firstly, the earth civilization has been destroyed many times, and it is not easy for human beings to know us after 5, years. Second, if they know that we existed, it means that they are highly developed, and they don't need history textbooks. It is only a matter of minutes for knowledge to teleport to their brains.

I think not. Even after 5 thousand years, history textbooks will not be ten times as thick as today's textbooks.

the first assumption: history has developed for another 5, years, and there are many important events to be recorded. I think only the key points will be recorded, and the textbook will not be too thick. If one volume doesn't work, it can be divided into two volumes.

the second hypothesis: the textbook may have been cancelled, and the paper will be published as a web page. Just like we went to Baidu, as long as we input the vocabulary of related events, there will be specific things in that era.

the third hypothesis: it's all filmed. It is more interesting to educate children through movies and let them learn by watching.

the fourth hypothesis: maybe cancel the history class and change to another subject.

the fifth hypothesis: there are no children in the world! Everyone is immortal, and there is no need to have children! So there is no need to study history. You can laugh at me. It's possible to be whimsical. Science is becoming more and more advanced, and maybe human beings will become immortals after 5 thousand years.

Of course, the above are all assumptions. Times are changing and history is developing. If there is a history class in the future, I believe the history textbook will not be too thick. Of course not, because human society is in constant development.

Books are the ladder of human progress. In the early stage of the evolution of human civilization, especially after the appearance of words, books are indispensable spiritual food for human beings, because human life is limited, and the fruits of human civilization are that one generation struggles to live a short life and leaves its legacy to future generations. Only by doing so can human beings achieve today's scientific and technological achievements. And this reciprocating medium is undoubtedly books. However, things are constantly developing. After the appearance of computers, the trend of screen replacing books has begun. < P > Fifty thousand years has been very long. During this period, there are a lot of historical records. If we want to record them one by one and circulate them in books, then the thickness of this book may be unimaginable, and a history textbook with ten times thickness can't be broken. This is the limitation of the book itself. Moreover, 5, years is enough to make human civilization go further, and more media methods will appear. Humans no longer need to use books to record history. The above is the author's view, please correct me if there is any discrepancy

After historical precipitation, the important events we once thought were just a drop in the ocean.

I am very happy to answer, "Will history textbooks be ten times as thick in fifty thousand years?"

the answer is: not only will it not be ten times as thick as it is now, it will become thinner and thinner, and even appear in front of students in a new form.

why do you say that? From a historical point of view, human beings have a history of 3 million years, and even the fossils of Yuanmou man discovered by China are 1.7 million years ago. We can recall that our history books only account for a small section about the history of nearly 1.7 million years. Therefore, the longer the history, the simpler the textbook is in telling.

?

Then let's look at it from another angle. From the point of view of the ancients, would Qin Shihuang think that paper-making would replace bamboo slips in the future? I don't even think that in the future, a pile of paper characters can be equivalent to a car full of bamboo slips.

Until the advent of papermaking, paper can hold more characters, and it is lighter in weight and occupies less area, which has continued to this day.

We said that after 5, years, will history textbooks become thicker and thicker? History textbooks are simple summaries of the relatively old, and the closer the age is, the more detailed it is. Chen Huanran felt that, not to mention 5, years, that is, hundreds of years later, the generation we live in has nothing to say, and it is also important to point out in detail. If it is really recorded in textbooks from ancient times to 5 thousand years, then I think the textbooks of students are not ten times as thick as they are now.

Finally, let me sum up, "After 5, years, will history textbooks be ten times as thick as they are now?" First: Nowadays, science and technology are more and more developed, and many endless scientific and technological exhibitions are presented before our eyes. Take our current e-book, for example, an electronic product, let's say a tablet, can even accommodate all the detailed historical records from ancient times to the present, and it can be said that a tablet savings can be equivalent to a library or even more. Second: Don't say that 5, years later, just say that our textbooks have been slowly digitized. My personal guess is that students may not have to carry heavy textbooks to school in the future, and each student can go to school easily with a tablet or other newly invented electronic products. Third: After 5, years, Chen Huanran can't even think about it. Even after 1 years, students may have been studying with teaching materials that are more convenient, more detailed, lighter and easier to understand than us. By then, how far will human civilization progress? I can't think of (you make up your own brains and try your best to make bold assumptions)

The progress of human civilization is beyond our details. We are also trying to imagine the future and try to walk step by step. I believe that ancient people will imagine what the future will be like, but I never thought that people could fly in the sky by plane. So do we. In the next 5, years, few people can probably imagine how textbooks will appear.

in 5, years, are there any books like this? It seems that the history books are not thick now, but the ancient books are thicker.

China is the last ancient country with a history of civilization. If we don't count Oracle Bone Inscriptions, the recorded history is only 3, to 4, years. If all the history books for so many years are made into history textbooks, and all the major events of past dynasties are clearly stated in the history textbooks, then the current history textbooks are ten times more than those used now!

Therefore, history textbooks will only talk about important historical events and nodes.

Even after 5, years, people are still using paper books, which won't be too thick. Take China as an example. During thousands of years, dynasties changed, wars and party struggles were numerous, so there are naturally many things to write down in history. With the development of the times to this point, the country tends to be stable, and there will not be as many changes as in the feudal era. Therefore, except for some epoch-making events, the rest will be brushed aside by the Spring and Autumn brushwork. What can be entered into the history class is even less.

The earliest self-made history textbook for primary schools in China is the History Textbook of China for Mongolian Studies, published by Civilization Publishing House in 193 and edited by Ding Baoshu, with a thickness of about 1 cm. During the period of the Republic of China, Liu Shipei compiled China History Textbook, with two volumes of 61 pages each. More than a hundred years have passed, the world has undergone earth-shaking changes, and we have entered the era of information explosion. But our middle school history textbooks are only about 1 cm thick each. So I guess that the thickness of history textbooks will not change much after 5 thousand years. This is related to the essential attributes of history textbooks: First, the compilation of history textbooks has a purpose

We can often see many large historical books, such as Zi Zhi Tong Jian, Ming Shi and Song Shi, and just a few sets can fill the whole bookshelf. But these books are for history majors or history lovers, and not everyone needs to learn. History textbooks are different, its readers are naturally middle school students, and it carries the national goal of talent education. Before compiling teaching materials, it is necessary to formulate a national unified curriculum goal, which is what we often call the curriculum standard. Experts begin to compile teaching materials according to the curriculum goal.