Success lies in people, and failure lies in people.

As a modern enterprise, in today's big market economy, shopping malls are like battlefields, so we should choose people who are competent for our jobs, so as to better develop the enterprise. As for virtue, it should be a personal matter. As long as it doesn't interfere with the work, the selection of people is of course the second place, and the selection of people is of course the use of talents.

The business world is like a battlefield. What is a battlefield? It's just smoke billowing and danger lurking. If you are not careful, you will lose your life! People try their best to deal with you, but you think I am a virtuous person. People don't move me, I don't move. If someone touches me, I'll go over! Will this work?

Our debate today is about employing people in enterprises, so he has a premise that he already has a manager. As long as this manager has both ability and political integrity, he must use "talented and capable" people to create wealth and benefits for this enterprise.

If you know history, we will expand this scope and regard an enterprise as a country, then the manager is an emperor. Now he needs people to govern and stabilize the country, so who does he need? We don't deny the importance of virtue, but we should distinguish between severity and size.

From ancient times to the present, it has always been a virtuous minister who ruled the country and made heroes in troubled times, among which "talent" is the most gaudy. Emperor Taizong was also suspected of regicide, and Song Taizu was also guilty of rebellion, but both were enlightened kings. How can regicide be considered virtuous, but the fact is that their celebrities are immortal and their shortcomings become yoga. So our point of view is: enterprises use talents first.

The second stage: asking questions

How fierce the competition is now, it can't be solved by virtue. I would like to ask the other two friends, when you write your resume, will you focus on how many good things you have done, or will you focus on your talents, skills and majors you have studied? Because the company recruits talents, not philanthropists. I would like to ask the other two debaters: when interviewing new people, do ordinary enterprises choose talents first at the initial test? The answer is yes, that is to say, people who have no talent or talent lower than others can't pass the first level at all. The so-called first, of course, is the first, only after the first level, will examine your virtue.

Enterprises put talents in the first place in order to create profits with talents. The survival of enterprises is not charity. Only by raising a group of virtuous people can the enterprise not stagnate. For example, a respected Taoist priest has a very high morality, but what contribution can he make to the enterprise? Does the enterprise need to spend a lot of money to hire him to sweep the floor? What is an enterprise and what is an interest? Enterprises need to create benefits. How can they create benefits without talent?

Furthermore: how can there be virtue without talent? Educated people are definitely better than uneducated people, which shows that morality should be based on the cultivation of cultural knowledge. A person who doesn't know whether to go to the public toilet or not will definitely urinate everywhere. When selecting a person for an enterprise, we should first pay attention to your academic qualifications, not the so-called moral character, because talent is the embodiment of moral character, and what we call talent also includes moral character, so talent is the premise of moral character. Without talent, there is no moral character. So what kind of people do enterprises choose? The answer is: gifted scholar!

The third stage: summary

With the rapid development of society and the shortage of human resources, the survival and development of enterprises need talents. A person without talent will be eliminated soon. Talent is reflected in work and life. His manners, his way of thinking, can explain whether this person has talent or not. Often the interview will see his talent first, and then see his character. Therefore, in the choice, it should be the first.

A reporter once interviewed the general manager of a Taiwan-funded enterprise. The general manager said frankly and clearly: "the key to employing people in enterprises is to see whether the candidates are suitable for the job requirements of enterprises, that is, whether they have applicable value." This is the objective basis for recruiting talents, and application is talents; If it doesn't apply, even if you graduated from a prestigious university with a high moral character, you must give up. " Employers always hope that the talents they recruit can be competent and create value for the enterprise, so the key to recruiting talents lies in whether their work ability and knowledge level meet the needs of the work.

How cruel is the competition between enterprises? Does the enterprise just want to fight with people who have no talent but are empty and virtuous? Then enterprises should liquidate their property as soon as possible so as not to lose their lives!

To say the least, our view is that talent comes first, which is not necessarily immoral. We only focus on the word "first". I don't think it is necessary to explain the meaning of "first". Of course, it is undeniable that some managers in enterprises must be convinced by virtue, but virtue here is actually another talent based on professional talents. Therefore, enterprise personnel or talent first!

The fourth stage: debate

We just emphasized: in fact, virtue is also a kind of ability to treat people! It has covered Germany, and the requirements of enterprises for talents actually indirectly require Germany. It can be seen that it makes sense for enterprises to put talents first!

It is not uncommon for a talent to save an enterprise and a talent to make an enterprise stand out among its peers. What does this mean? Many times, it is really impossible for an enterprise to have only one person; But in more cases, it is precisely the enterprise that lacks a leading talent.

If an enterprise has such a leading talent, and his virtue may not be so good in some aspects, but it is not enough to affect the reputation and development of the enterprise, will such a person be used?

Qin Gui is a traitor, but how do people know about him? If you are not famous, how can you talk about traitors if you are not a minister? How can he be a minister? It was the emperor who took a fancy to his talent that he reused it. Isn't that talent first?

Next, let's sum up what we said above, "Talent is the top priority of an enterprise", which is embodied in:

First, a person's talent can be revealed in the shortest time, such as writing a field plan, a proposal about what kind of products can enhance the competitiveness of enterprises and so on. As long as you are really talented, you can finish it in a short time. However, when a person with high moral character is asked by an enterprise to write a plan on how to play, because he can't write it, does he have to write how noble his moral character is, how selfless he is and so on in a language unrelated to the plan? Who do you think the enterprise wants and uses? Moreover, all the virtues he said were his own evaluations. Without long-term understanding, how can enterprises know if you are that kind of person?

Second, if the enterprise urgently needs marketing talents with relevant experience to go to the market at this time, and time is pressing, then there are two people to apply. One person has a marketing certificate and relevant experience, while the other person only has an honorary certificate of sacrificing oneself to save others. So who do you think the enterprise will use at this time?

The most important thing for an enterprise is profit, that is, benefit, that is, how to gain a foothold in the market. If an enterprise can't have talents to create profits and improve efficiency, it will be eliminated in such fierce competition, and the acquisition of these talents depends on the eclectic employment of enterprises. Enterprises are not charitable organizations, so it is impossible to consider the interests of others and other enterprises first. They must let themselves live before they can repay the society and be qualified to talk about morality. Winners and losers, don't other debaters think that the loser's enterprise is where there is no moral help and no talent help?

Furthermore, enterprises have different moral requirements. Morality is really important for enterprises, even related to life and death. However, the moral requirements of enterprises are based on the fact that enterprises can survive in the competition and start to develop steadily. Then enterprises began to require employees to have professional ethics and to unite and cooperate. If the survival of an enterprise is in question, isn't it ridiculous to pay attention to morality?

We compare the Three Kingdoms to three enterprises, one of which is headed by Liu Bei. So who are his men Guan Gong, Zhang Fei and Zhuge Liang? Guan Gong, a million-strong master in Mawei Town, dismounted and studied the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period. He is a rare talent, but he is a superficial virtue. Zhang Fei, who can fight militarily, is brave and invincible, but he has a bad temper and a little shallow morality. Zhuge Liang, who knows astronomy above and geography below, knows himself. From his determination to help others become his overlord, we can see that Zhuge Liang is also a little shallow. Then I want to ask another debater, who is the person who is used as Liu Bei's enterprise? Isn't talent the first thing? Therefore, from the above aspects, we can sum up a sentence: if enterprises want to survive, they must use talents, so enterprises must first choose talents!

The fifth stage: summary

Our point of view is that talent is the top priority of enterprises. Talent, that is, knowledge and ability, is it virtue that promotes human progress and productivity development in history? Don't! Relying on the essence of the universe, human talent! In history, there are far more people who are famous for their talents than for their virtues, such as Newton, Einstein, Madame Curie and so on. Too many. There are other debaters who seem to be covering the surface with dots. After all, people like destruction are a minority. We don't mean that morality is unimportant, but we can't give up our mainstream because we are a minority, that is, enterprises choose talents first. As our party has always emphasized, it is a truth to take economic construction as the center and downplay class struggle! The rapid development of society makes our task of cultivating talents more urgent. Morality is implicit, but it is explicit. What do we take in the college entrance examination now? It is true that we have signed a letter of commitment to integrity, but the college entrance examination is our talent! Ask the other debater to face the reality, don't cover the face with points, let alone talk on paper without reality! We are here to debate what is right for us to rely on!

"Talent, career, national prosperity"! We have always reiterated that we have not completely rejected Germany. What we are saying is that talents are more important to enterprises, and morality can only be an auxiliary agent to promote better play. Virtue without talent is incompetence; Virtue is the bane. Since it is a "talent", it is natural to put talent first.