How to deal with group interview

First, the examination room is arranged in the preparation stage.

After a group of six of us entered the examination room, we saw that the seat was in a semicircle with a small radian, and the examiner's seat was in a straight line, which was exactly a semicircle. So everyone basically faces the examiner, whether it's 1 or 6. The distance from the examiner is about 2 meters. Those sitting in the middle face the middle examiner, and those sitting next to the examiner face other examiners, so that each examiner can fully observe all the players.

Topic: One question for each person, two draft papers and a pen on the desk.

Content: The TV station conducted a caring model selection activity, and there are currently 6 candidates. The task of this group is: 1. First, put forward at least three evaluation criteria, and sort them in turn.

Second, choose three candidates.

Requirements: After reading the question 15 minutes, make a personal statement for 3 minutes from 1 to 6. After the presentation, discuss freely for 40 minutes, and finally recommend a team member to make a 5-minute summary presentation.

Third, the personal presentation stage.

Through simulation and actual combat, I have an experience: the speech in the first three minutes largely determines the victory or defeat of the whole set! Personally, my heart is:

First of all, you must be concise. Second, you must have a big hat at first.

First, why be concise? For example, if you repeat a candidate's story for three minutes in a row, how touching it is and how much his contribution is ... So, everyone said it again, which is actually repeating the existing content of the topic, not to mention the examiner, and he will feel tired. Imagine this situation, how can we catch the examiner's eye?

Second, the hat problem. Just like everyone trying to write a paper for the first time, it should be in line with the national policies such as Scientific Outlook on Development, harmonious society and people's livelihood issues. When making a presentation, you can also think about the background of the topic. Taking the topic we discussed as an example, why is there a selection of love patterns? You can contact the selection activities such as Touching China, which is not difficult to find. In fact, it caters to the national policy of building socialist core value system, building Socialism with Chinese characteristics culture and strengthening soft power construction. With this in mind, you can put forward two sentences at the beginning of your speech: China's economy is developing now, and people's living standards are … but … then you put forward Socialism with Chinese characteristics's cultural construction and the country's soft power … so that you can look higher and brighter than others! Taking our simulated corruption problem as an example, we can first talk about the rapid development of national economic construction and some corruption phenomena, which are by no means universal, but should be paid attention to. ...

Intonation and speed of speech

Usually I speak faster, which is not good, because the discussion gives people a sense of debate. Some players pointed this out to me during the simulation, so I improved and slowed down during the exam that day. I feel the same way myself. Slowing down, being more organized, is often more attractive and convincing.

Another important point is that your speech should have ups and downs. To put it bluntly, it is the kind with some feelings, which is more arresting.

Eye contact

Don't talk nonsense, make eye contact. You don't look at the examiner, and the examiner doesn't pay attention to it.

What if I draw a number?

When making a personal statement, everyone has prepared time, such as: 1No. is 15 minutes, No.2 is 15+ 1 3 is 15 minutes+/2, and so on, so it is generally.

But in this exam, I made a new discovery: after my speech, the team members at the back started with a few short and powerful China sayings, and then she mentioned: the construction of socialist core value system. I think it is more appropriate than what I said (I was talking about Socialism with Chinese characteristics's cultural construction and national soft power). So I personally think that the personal statement of the latter player is the best. But because I have put forward similar content before her, it is not easy to have a bright spot. Therefore, if a friend with poor psychological quality draws the number 1, don't be sad and nervous on the 2 nd. As mentioned earlier, the highlights will be more obvious!

Fourth, the stage of free discussion

What I just said was my personal experience when I made a statement. Let's talk about group discussion first:

In this long examination process, it is also a test for examiners, and fatigue is inevitable. A friend said: I have poor eloquence and slow thinking. I can't say anything more. What if my idea is robbed by other team members? At this time, my suggestion is: but there is nothing wrong with asking!

Remember, just because you say less doesn't mean your score is necessarily low. Try to be as precise as possible. When those who are rushing to speak are almost finished, you should form some ideas of your own. At this time, the examiner will also notice that you haven't spoken for a long time, and then you will throw out your relatively mature ideas. To be more precise, well, you also scored! So, if you are not good at words at ordinary times, don't say it in a hurry. It's easy to make mistakes or get stuck! This is nothing more than asking for it.

Eye contact

Try to see which team member you are talking to and make more eye contact. When talking to everyone, you can casually scan each group member instead of talking to the examiner.

Does the correctness of the result matter?

Like the topics of our interview, choose 3 from 6 and then sort them. People don't have to worry about whether your choice is consistent with the final result. First of all, there is no right answer to this question. Another example is that the final result of our discussion is a candidate combination that no one has proposed. Because according to my observation, at the beginning of a person's speech, the examiner does not record who specifically said what. This is very important. Why do you say that? It is mainly to give a hint to friends with high numbers: If you don't have enough time to review the topic and feel anxious, then analyze all the options one by one, so it is better to focus on a few key points or catch the items you think you have something to say. As long as it makes sense. Don't be afraid that your answer is wrong.

Be sure not to grab words.

During the interview, I was seriously injured: I grabbed words several times. Mainly influenced by the big atmosphere, the atmosphere of our group has always been friendly and relaxed, and we speak casually, so everyone interrupts others to varying degrees. Try it after the exam, it really shouldn't be! My advice to you is: Don't interrupt others at any time. If you interrupt by accident, you can say: I'm sorry to interrupt you. Then signal him to continue.

time control

At the beginning of the group discussion, it is best to recommend a team member wearing a watch to control the time. Our group will suffer in this exam. Because in the mock exam, our team members are well prepared and have a clear division of labor. At the beginning of every discussion, some team members will take the initiative to control the time, which has caused my carelessness! Of course, I thought that a team member would automatically remind me of the time during the exam, but I found out that I was wrong! No one in our group noticed the time problem, which directly led to a bit of confusion in the rhythm of the whole discussion. Regret!

Verb (abbreviation for verb) summary statement

The final presentation time is not included in the group discussion time, but the examiner will not remind the group that the discussion time is over. Please make a presentation. Instead, team members need to grasp their own time and take the initiative to make statements at an appropriate time.

At this point, we made a mistake in the simulation, and the simulation examiner reminded us to ask a team member to make a statement, so I always thought that the examiner would remind us during the exam! But I looked at the time and the examiner didn't remind me. I'm anxious, but I don't know what to do. I was almost silent. Later, maybe the examiner couldn't stand it, and finally said, "remind me, pay attention to the time!" " I don't know. I may not remind you to make a summary alone. I'm a little anxious. What I said is very short, maybe 1 minute, but you know the rule is 5 minutes. Depressed ... so be sure to recommend someone to record the time at the beginning!

Sixth, about dress.

Everyone has his own style. As for whether to wear a suit, my suggestion is: boys must wear it, and girls don't have to wear it. But the principle is that clothes must be worn naturally, otherwise it will affect the state. I bought a g2000 suit before the exam and finally gave up! Because I usually wear clothes casually, I feel uncomfortable wearing formal clothes. In this case, I am afraid that my attention will be diverted by clothes, which will affect my performance. So in the end, I chose to wear Korean gray wool simple coat+black straight pants+black low-heeled shoes. But if you are used to wearing formal clothes, it is definitely right to wear formal clothes. Here we go again, but welcome!

The above is my experience of participating in the discussion of leaderless group. I wrote it in a hurry, and I will add and modify it at any time when there are new contents. I hope I can successfully pass the interview and wish all my comrades-in-arms a triumphant return!

After the interview failed, it also gave me a lot of experience.

After the interview, an examiner said that the whole examination room is a stage, so you should pay attention to every detail. He asked several of our candidates to pay attention to putting the chairs back in their original positions when they finally left. Indeed, in more than two hours, every detail of you was seen by the examiner, which is different from a structured interview. It takes no more than 15 minutes to get in and out, which requires us to have stronger "performance ability".

2. Never give yourself a role in advance. In the big stage of unstructured interview, everyone has no fixed role, and you should not position yourself as a leader in advance, because this is an interactive organization, and you can't predict how others will behave. You should change your role at any time according to the development of the situation. We have a teammate who is very strong and pretends to be the leader. She got the lowest score.

Never be influenced by others. In this interactive process, learning and reference are inevitable, so don't deliberately pursue innovation. The topic of the leaderless group interview is very simple. What the examiner cares about is not what you said, but how you said it. All you have to do is state your views clearly. There is a teammate whose ranking is quite different from his final score, but it does not affect his high score.

4, but nothing else. You can't predict whether your own brilliance meets the tastes of all examiners, because each examiner's taste is different, so don't deliberately pursue special. However, all examiners always pay attention to any mistakes you make.

More interview skills can be found in www.xinzhjy.com New Employment Education Network.