Job Recruitment Website - Zhaopincom - Counterexample of honesty
Counterexample of honesty
According to the prosecution's accusation, Sun and Liu used the means of falsifying project expenditures to obtain more than 8.25 million yuan of state-owned funds, and controlled the transfer of 7.82 million yuan to Ningxia Longhu Huaxing Co., Ltd. in the name of fictitious paid-in capital investment bureau Yinchuan office; Sun personally decided and instructed Liu to transfer more than 2.02 million yuan from the bank to the financial account of Dagu Railway Company under the guise of personal housing loans for employees of Dagu Railway Company, and then lend it to Ningxia Longhu Huaxing Co., Ltd. for business activities. Their behavior constitutes the crime of corruption and misappropriation of public funds.
According to the accusation of the procuratorate, Sun and Jiao violated state regulations and privately distributed more than 7.83 million yuan of state-owned assets of Dagu Railway Company to employees. Sun is the directly responsible person in charge and Jiao is the directly responsible person, all of which constitute the crime of dividing state-owned assets privately.
In August 2006, the case was put on file for investigation by the procuratorate of the autonomous region, and the investigation ended in March 2007. On April 26 of that year, the procuratorate of the autonomous region appointed the procuratorate of Guyuan City to review and prosecute. During the period, it was returned twice for supplementary investigation. In June 5438+10, Guyuan City Procuratorate filed a public prosecution with Guyuan Intermediate People's Court. During the trial of the case by the court, the procuratorate found that Sun and Jiao were suspected of embezzling state-owned assets, so the procuratorate of the autonomous region added a case and transferred it to the procuratorate of Guyuan City for review and prosecution on March 26.
Two "top leaders" of Guangdong CDC were detained for collecting huge kickbacks.
According to a number of people familiar with the matter, Deng Feng, director of the Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and Luo Xiongcai, deputy director of the Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, were recently approved by the Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection, and the "double regulations" measures were implemented by the Provincial Organs Commission for Discipline Inspection. On the morning of April 30th, the Provincial Health Department appointed Zhang Yonghui, director of Guangdong Health Supervision Institute, as the director of the provincial CDC.
Earlier, the bribery case of Luo Yaoxing, the former director of the Institute of Immunization Planning of the Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, shocked the whole country.
According to informed sources, Deng Feng and Luo Xiongcai are closely related to Luo Yaoxing. Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention made outstanding achievements in the fight against SARS in 2003. Deng Feng and Luo Xiongcai were awarded "First Class Merit" and "Second Class Merit" by the provincial party committee and government respectively for their outstanding contributions to fighting Africa, and were also received by state leaders. As the main body of Guangdong Anti-Africa Monument, the sculpture with this theme still stands in the sculpture park.
According to informed sources, Deng and Luo's alleged economic problems are mainly accepting kickbacks from purchasing equipment and vaccines, and the specific amount involved varies widely, and the amount is quite huge. They were "double-regulated" just two years after Luo Yaoxing was criminally detained and arrested in April 2006.
On July 2 1, entrusted by Guangxi High Court, Qinzhou Intermediate People's Court of Guangxi made a final judgment on the case of Wei Liang, the former chairman and general manager of Guangxi Banzhou Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., accepting bribes, embezzling and misappropriating public funds ... Wei Liang was guilty of accepting bribes, embezzling and misappropriating public funds, and was punished for several crimes. Decided to execute fixed-term imprisonment of 19 years and confiscate personal property of 400,000 yuan.
Wei Liang, 5 1 year-old, has successively won the titles of "Guangxi Model Worker", the first "Top Ten Outstanding Youth in Guangxi", the fourth "Top Ten Outstanding Youth in China", the second "Outstanding Entrepreneur in Chinese Medicine Industry" and "Outstanding Expert with Outstanding Contributions" awarded by the State Council.
It was found through trial that during his tenure as the director of Qinzhou Pharmaceutical Factory and the chairman and general manager of Guangxi Wuzhou Pharmaceutical Group Company, Wei Liang accepted bribes of RMB 6,543,800+0.8 million from the contractor three times in the process of undertaking and paying the project funds for the staff dormitory of Wuzhou Company. In the process of contracting out the residential project of Qinzhou Pharmaceutical Factory, the residential project of Banzhou Pharmaceutical Group Company and the civil project of Qinzhou Hercules Hotel and paying the project funds, the contractor accepted a bribe of 600,000 yuan. In the process of contracting and paying for the installation project of air-conditioning equipment in Hercules Hotel, the installer was bribed by RMB 200,000. In the process of contracting the road greening and sewage treatment project of Banzhou Company and paying the project cost, he accepted a bribe of RMB 200,000 from the contractor. Wei Liang * * * took bribes of RMB1180,000 yuan.
From 2000 to 2002, in order to achieve the target responsibility index, Guangxi Banzhou Group Company took measures such as inflating the company's profits and falsely reporting the total industrial output value, so that the company exceeded the target responsibility index year after year. Qinzhou Economic and Trade Commission issued a document for three consecutive years, agreeing that Banzhou Company will issue the business target responsibility award * * * 1.46 million yuan according to the policy, of which 1.4435438+0.2 million yuan was obtained through false reporting. Wei Liang and others knew that the money was illegally obtained, but they still illegally possessed it and deliberately took it for themselves. Among them, Wei Liang got RMB 28,265,438+0,465,438+0,000.
Wei Liang also misappropriated public funds of RMB 1 1 yuan and 1.26 million yuan on February and March 3, 2004, respectively, for individuals to purchase 48.66 mu of land in Fenghuangling, Ludong Village Committee, Luwu Town, Lingshan for profit-making activities.
The Guangxi Higher People's Court held that Wei Liang, as a public official of a state-owned company, took advantage of his position to illegally accept other people's property of 1. 1.8 million yuan, which constituted the crime of accepting bribes. Wei Liang, as a person appointed by the state organs to engage in organization, leadership, supervision and management on behalf of the state organs in a state-owned joint stock limited company, conspired with others to defraud public property of1444438+0.2 million yuan by means of falsely reporting profits and output value, which has constituted the crime of corruption; Taking advantage of his position, misappropriating public funds of 6,543,800 yuan+0.26 million yuan for profit-making activities is huge, which has constituted the crime of misappropriating public funds. Should be punished for several crimes. Wei Liang was put on file for investigation on suspicion of misappropriating public funds. Without knowing the facts of the crime of corruption and bribery, the investigation organ truthfully confessed the facts of the crime of corruption and bribery. According to the law, he surrendered himself and can be given a lighter or mitigated punishment. However, Wei Liang only returned 654.38 million yuan of stolen money, and most of the stolen money was not returned. The original judgment decided to give him a lighter punishment for corruption and bribery according to law. Wei Liang's grounds for appeal and his defenders' arguments are untenable and should be dismissed.
Guangxi Higher People's Court sentenced Wei Liang to fixed-term imprisonment of 14 years for accepting bribes and confiscated 200,000 yuan of personal property. Sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment 10 year for corruption, and confiscated 200,000 yuan of personal property; He was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment for embezzlement of public funds. The total sentence is 34 years, and it is decided to execute fixed-term imprisonment 19 years, and confiscate personal property of 400,000 yuan; In order to recover and confiscate the proceeds of crime in Wei Liang,
- Previous article:Which developer is Huaihua Hengda Dijing?
- Next article:Which entrance does Huadu Light Rail enter?
- Related articles
- Can Nanyang Auxiliary Police get a raise this year?
- Does the Apple Store in Tian Huan Square buy a mobile phone to deliver film?
- Dongguan Liaobu Shixiang Park and Shixiang Zoo are the same thing. Some people say the same thing together. But someone on Baidu said that Shixiang Park doesn't need tickets.
- Do you think people in their forties and fifties still need to apply everywhere? Why?
- What is the telephone number of Bazhong Zhongjiao Wangfujing Store Marketing Center?
- How to repair the bright strip of automobile decorative strip?
- Kneeling: 1, Chongqing pharmaceutical company ranks 2, I am a fresh graduate of non-pharmaceutical major, and want to do pharmaceutical sales. I don't know which company to go to, and my answer is exc
- Is Liupanshui Huilong No.1 Hospital worth buying?
- How about Jinan Wanchuang Paint Co., Ltd.?
- How to prepare for the exam of recruiting community workers? Do you have any reference books?