Cancel the policy of fresh graduates in 2022.

Graduates have the status of "fresh graduates" and have advantages in job hunting and exams. In fact, as early as 2002, the Ministry of Education and other departments issued the Notice on Further Deepening the Reform of the Employment System for College Graduates. Among them, it is proposed that "for college graduates who have not implemented their work units when they leave school ... the school can move their hukou to the place where they registered before entering school or keep it in the original university within two years according to the students' own wishes, and then move their hukou to the place of work after the work units are implemented."

By 2020, the Ministry of Education once again emphasizes that colleges and universities should help graduates who have not implemented their units within two years to go through employment procedures as fresh graduates.

Hu Wei, member of Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, counselor of Shanghai Municipal Government and executive vice chairman of Shanghai China Vocational Education Association, submitted the Proposal on Abolishing the Identity Restriction of Fresh Graduates and Guaranteeing the Equal Employment Right, proposing to gradually abolish the employment policy of college graduates, treat all college graduates equally in the recruitment of civil servants and institutions, and eliminate artificial obstacles to employment.

Hu Wei pointed out that the purpose of implementing the job-seeking policy for college graduates is to promote the employment of recent college graduates and give them a certain job-seeking buffer period. With the increase of college graduates year by year, some graduates choose "slow employment", flexible employment and having children at home after graduation, and this policy also exposes more and more problems.

Xu Qiao, a member of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) and president of Nanjing University of Technology, suggested that the status of "fresh graduates" should be downplayed, and the education authorities, human and social departments and employers should downplay the requirements for "fresh graduates". "Graduates have submitted employment-related information and purchased social insurance" should not be used as a condition to restrict open recruitment and open examinations.

The difference between college graduates and ordinary employees lies in their "fresh" status, which provides them with many advantages in choosing jobs, but at the same time it also causes a series of employment disadvantages.

"In recent years, the recruitment rate of fresh graduates in the civil service examination of state organs has reached about 60%. What's more, some local colleges and universities also stipulate that the proportion of fresh graduates is not less than 70%, and the proportion of fresh graduates recruited by state-owned enterprises is not less than 50%. " In view of this, Hu Wei clearly pointed out in the proposal: restricting the applicant's status as a fresh graduate during recruitment is not conducive to the re-employment of those who have left and re-employed, and it also hinders previous graduates who have exceeded their job-hunting period from finding a job smoothly.

At the same time, Xu Qiao also said in the proposal that the standard of "fresh graduates" is contradictory, which has an impact on students' employment. He pointed out that the current "fresh" status has advantages in job hunting, examination and settlement, especially in the recruitment of civil servants. Graduates are cautious about their jobs and usually wait for the price.

According to Jiao Xin 'an, deputy to the National People's Congress and secretary of the Party Committee of Yangzhou University, at present, the state encourages the civil service examination and the recruitment of state-owned enterprises and institutions to tilt towards fresh graduates, and makes it clear that college graduates who have not been employed within two years enjoy the status of "fresh graduates". This policy is of great significance to broaden employment channels, stabilize employment and protect people's livelihood. However, Jiao Xin 'an found that the high concern about the "status of fresh graduates" prompted graduates who could have been employed in non-public enterprises to choose not to be employed first and repeatedly apply for positions within the system to keep their qualifications. The same phenomenon also appears in more and more groups that have not "landed" in the postgraduate entrance examination. When they go to the job market to seek more job opportunities, they want to keep their "graduate status". Graduates' incomprehension of this policy undoubtedly gave birth to active slow employment or no employment, which increased the structural contradiction of employment to a certain extent, thus violating the original intention of policy formulation.