An old man in Nanning was injured by a car on a zebra crossing and had seven operations. Who should be responsible for this?

The driver and the network car platform share the responsibility.

When people were crossing the zebra crossing, they were hit by a speeding car, resulting in multiple fractures of their bodies. After admission, they underwent seven operations, and it is still unknown whether their bodies can return to normal. After the accident, the traffic police investigated the scene and determined that the network car was fully responsible. However, the network car driver signed a contract with the network car platform, which belongs to the same subject and should bear the risks, so the network car platform should also bear the corresponding responsibilities.

The old man was seriously injured by the network car on the zebra crossing, and the driver and the network car platform should bear the responsibility. Although the traffic police think that the network car driver is fully responsible when defining the responsibility, the network car driver still signed the corresponding contract with the network car platform. As the manager and organizer of the network car, he should bear the risks, so the network car platform should also bear the corresponding responsibilities.

When making claims after the accident, many parties disagreed. The family members of the elderly think that the driver should bear all the responsibilities, but the driver thinks that he belongs to the network car platform and should bear the corresponding responsibilities. However, the network car company has not responded positively, leading to a deadlock in the negotiations. The driver involved in the accident was purchased by a vehicle, but commercial insurance can't pay in full. The part that needs to be borne by the individual should be borne by the driver involved and the network car platform.

After the intervention of relevant departments and media, the online car platform responded and promised to bear joint and several liability for compensation. The relevant staff of the platform told the media that they have been involved in the handling and investigation of this accident and will actively contact the families of the injured to communicate the follow-up compensation. If the online car platform shirks its responsibility and does not deal with the problem, then the online car driver can protect his legitimate rights and interests through legal means, and can take the online car platform to court. The victim's family can even take the driver and the online car platform together as defendants. Take it to court and demand compensation.