On the basis of meritocracy, meritocracy means no action. What does meritocracy mean in meritocracy?

This question is definitely wrong. The reason is that "only meritorious deeds are useless" does not conform to the syntactic norms.

Wei Cai Ju, in classical Chinese, belongs to the structure of "Wei...is...", indicating the singleness of the object, Wei (wei), only. Yes, the helping object is brought forward. Only talents are promoted, and the object is "talent". If the sign "yes" in front of the object is removed, it becomes "only talents are promoted". It means only selecting talented people. This is true in the well-known "only...is..." structure. For example: mercenary - only looking for profit; only looking at my horse's head - only looking at my horse's head (direction). Obedience to orders, divination to neighbors...etc.

Look again at "Meritism is useless". And interpret "wu" as "wu": can't; can't. Then, meritocracy is useless, which means: as long as they are virtuous people, they cannot be appointed.

Xian (morality) and talent (talent) have always been the two major criteria for selecting and employing people in the past dynasties of our country. Although sometimes there is emphasis, there is no partiality.

Based on this, it can be concluded that the problem of "being meritocratic is useless" does not exist.