Heilongjiang Unicom interview process, interview questions, interview precautions, experience sharing. Know everything, say everything, and wait for the experienced great god to share his experience.

Hello, every company will be different, and the performance of the person in charge will definitely be different. So just pay attention to what most companies will ask. It doesn't matter what you do first.

Pass the interview questions

Comments: I personally like to use this as the opening remarks of the interview. In fact, I already know this question very well, so I will take it as an opening statement, and then I will look for opportunities to understand the problems found in reading my resume during the opening statement. When you answer this question, you must think about the details. At this time, the examiner usually asks a few details. Generally fabricated resumes and experiences will be "wasted" in this process.

Question 2: "Talk about your family"

Conventional ideas: ① It is helpful to understand the personality, concept and mentality of the candidate, which is the main reason for the recruitment company to ask questions; 2 simply list the family population; ③ Emphasis on warm and harmonious family atmosphere; ④ Parents should pay attention to their own education; ⑤ It is appropriate to emphasize that family members have good conditions; ⑥ It is advisable to emphasize the support of family members for their work; ⑦ Emphasize your sense of responsibility for your family.

Comments: This question is rarely asked, because it involves personal privacy after all. State-owned enterprises and some private enterprises like to ask questions, mainly to understand social relations. Not the answer above.

Question 3: "Do you have any hobbies?"

Conventional thinking: ① hobbies can reflect the personality, concepts and mentality of candidates to a certain extent, which is the main reason for employers to ask questions; 2 it is best not to say that you have no hobbies; Don't say that you have those vulgar and unpleasant hobbies; It is best not to say that it is limited to reading, listening to music and surfing the internet, otherwise the interviewer may suspect that the candidate is withdrawn; It is best to have some outdoor hobbies to "embellish" your image.

Comments: This question is generally not asked much, and the probability of asking questions when interviewing college students is high. If the main purpose of interviewing people with work experience is to eliminate tension and let the other person relax, the question itself has no special significance.

Question 4: "Who do you admire most?"

Conventional thinking: ① The most admired person can reflect the personality, concept and mentality of the applicant to a certain extent, which is the main purpose of the interviewer; It is inappropriate to say that you don't worship anyone; 3. It is inappropriate to say that you worship yourself; (4) It is not advisable to worship people who are fictitious or unknown; ⑤ It is not appropriate to worship a person who obviously has a negative image; 6. The person you admire is best related to the job you are applying for; ⑦ It is best to say what qualities and thoughts of people you admire have infected and inspired yourself.

Comments: At most, this question is never used by experienced people when interviewing fresh graduates, otherwise it will appear that the examiner is stupid.

Question 5: "What is your motto?"

Conventional thinking: ① Motto can reflect the personality, concept and mentality of the candidate to a certain extent, which is the main reason why the interviewer asks this question; (2) It is not appropriate to say those proverbs that cause bad associations; (3) It is not advisable to say those overly abstract maxims; 4 maxims should not be said too long; ⑤ Motto can best reflect some of its excellent qualities; ⑥ Reference answer-"Only find ways for success, not excuses for failure".

Comments: The answer to this question is the same as above.

Question 6: "Talk about your shortcomings"

Conventional thinking: ① It is inappropriate to say that you have no shortcomings; (2) It is not conducive to those obvious advantages becoming disadvantages; (3) It is not appropriate to state the shortcomings that seriously affect the position you are applying for; (4) It's not appropriate to say the shortcomings that make people uneasy and uncomfortable; ⑤ You can name some shortcomings that have nothing to do with the position you are applying for, or even some "shortcomings" that look like advantages from the work point of view.

Comments: This question is the most "harmful" among all kinds of interview skills. Examiners ask this question to test a person's maturity, self-judgment, and learning and improving ability. It doesn't matter at all what shortcomings you have. The key assessment here is whether the interviewer really has a correct evaluation of himself, and generally, when asking such questions, I like to ask the interviewer to give one or two specific examples, which is more real. In particular, answering with the above idea 5 is purely to treat the interviewer as XXX. Can't they hear you? If you answer like this, the candidate will definitely lose a lot of points in the interviewer's mind.

Question 7: "Tell me about a failure"

Conventional thinking: ① It is inappropriate to say that you have no experience of failure; It is inappropriate to describe those obvious successes as failures; (3) It is not appropriate to tell the failure experience that seriously affects the applied position; ④ The result of experience should be failure; It should be noted that I was confident and tried my best before I failed. ⑥ Explain that failure is only caused by external objective reasons; After my failure, I quickly cheered up and faced my future work with more enthusiasm.

Comments: The so-called classic thinking above is the purpose of the examiner who misjudged this question again. When the examiner asks this question, he just wants to know your way of doing things, not your failure. This question will often become your successful experience, the most unforgettable thing in your work and so on. At this time, the examiner will generally focus on three aspects, namely, the background and resources at that time, the way the applicant handled things, and the results reflected by the applicant at that time. Through these three points, we can understand a person's working methods and learning ability. The so-called thinking above, focusing on the failure of explanation, is purely a trap for examiners.

Question 8: "Why did you choose our company?"

Conventional ideas: ① The interviewer tries to understand your motivation, desire and attitude towards this job; (2) It is suggested to answer from three angles: industry, enterprise and post; Reference answer-"I am very optimistic about your industry. I think your company attaches great importance to talents and this job suits me very well. I believe I can do it well. "

Comments: I seldom ask this question. If someone asks this question, it is ok to answer it according to the train of thought.

Question 9: "What are the foreseeable difficulties in this job?"

Conventional thinking: ① It is not appropriate to directly tell specific difficulties, otherwise the other party may suspect that the applicant is unqualified; (2) You can try circuitous tactics and tell the examinee's attitude towards difficulties-"It is normal and inevitable to encounter some difficulties in your work, but as long as you have perseverance, a good spirit of cooperation and make full preparations in advance, any difficulties can be overcome."

Comments: Generally, if you ask this question, the interviewer's hope will be even greater, because he is already talking about the details of the job. But the answer under the conventional way of thinking was "cheated" by the interviewer again. The interviewer asks this question for two purposes. First, look at whether the candidate is good at it and whether the difficulties mentioned are generally inevitable for this position. The second is to see if the applicant's method of solving difficulties is correct and whether the company can provide such resources. I don't want to know the applicant's attitude towards the difficulties.

Question 10: "If I hire you, how will you work?"

Conventional thinking: ① If the applicant lacks sufficient understanding of the position he is applying for, it is best not to directly tell the specific method of carrying out the work; (2) You can try to use circuitous tactics to answer, such as "first listen to the instructions and requirements of the leaders, then understand and be familiar with the relevant situation, then make a short-term work plan and report it to the leaders for approval, and finally carry out the work as planned."

Comments: This question mainly wants to know the job ability, plan and organization of the candidate and know the details. If you are talking about the roundabout tactics in your mind, the interviewer will think that you are avoiding the question, and if you still avoid it after several times of guidance. This man will never be hired.

Question 1 1: "What will you do if you disagree with your superiors?"

Conventional thinking: ① Generally, you can answer "I will give my superiors the necessary explanations and reminders. In this case, I will obey the opinions of my superiors. " If you are interviewed by the general manager, and there is another manager in the position you are applying for, and this manager is not present at that time, you can answer like this: "For non-principled issues, I will obey the opinions of my superiors, and for major issues involving the interests of the company, I hope to reflect them to my superiors."

Comments: The standard answer to this question is 1. If you answer with 2, you will die. You don't know the internal situation of the company, and you want to report it first. No one dares to ask such a person.

Question 12: "Why should we hire you?"

Conventional ideas: ① It is best for candidates to answer from the perspective of the recruiting company; (2) Recruiting companies generally employ candidates who are basically qualified, interested in this job and have enough confidence; For example, "I meet the recruitment requirements of your company, and I am fully qualified for this job with my current skills, high sense of responsibility, good adaptability and learning ability." I really hope to serve your company. If your company gives me this opportunity, I will definitely become the pillar of your company! "

Comments: According to the answer in the train of thought, it is OK.

Question 13: "You are a fresh graduate with insufficient experience. How can you be qualified for this job? "

Conventional thinking: ① If the recruiting unit asks this question to the candidates of recent graduates, it means that the recruiting company doesn't really care about "experience", and the key depends on how the candidates answer; The answer to this question should best reflect the applicant's sincerity, wit, courage and dedication; As a fresh graduate, I really lack work experience, so I have been taking advantage of various opportunities to work part-time in this industry during my study. I also found that practical work is far richer and more complicated than books. But I have a strong sense of responsibility, adaptability and learning ability, and I am diligent, so I can successfully complete all the work in my part-time job, and I also benefit a lot from the experience I have gained from it. Please rest assured that my school study and part-time work experience make me qualified for this position. "

Comments: The answer to this question is acceptable. It is best to highlight your ability to endure hardship, adaptability and learning (not academic performance).

Question 14: "What kind of boss do you want to work with?"

Conventional thinking: ① the applicant's self-demand consciousness can be judged from his "hope" for his superiors, which is both a trap and an opportunity; (2) It is best to avoid the specific hopes of superiors and talk more about their own requirements; As a newcomer who has just stepped into the society, I should ask myself to be familiar with and adapt to the environment as soon as possible, instead of making any demands on the environment, as long as I can give full play to my special skills.

Comments: The better answer to this question is that I hope my superiors will give me more guidance in my work and point out the mistakes in my work immediately. In short, there will be no big mistakes in terms of superior guidance.

Question 15: "What's the reason why you left your last company?"

Conventional thinking: ① The most important thing is that the applicant should convince the recruiting unit that the "reason for leaving" of the applicant in the previous unit does not exist in this recruiting unit; 2 avoid saying "reasons for leaving" in too detailed and specific terms; ③ There should be no subjective negative feelings such as "working too hard", "complicated interpersonal relationship", "chaotic management", "the company does not attach importance to talents" and "the company rejects our employees". (4) but you can't dodge or avoid it, such as "I want to change the environment" and "personal reasons"; ⑤ Don't involve your negative personality traits, such as dishonesty, laziness, lack of responsibility, easygoing, etc. ⑥ Try to make the explained reasons add luster to the applicant's personal image; 7 related examples: for example, "I left my job because this company went bankrupt;" I have worked in the company for more than three years and have deep feelings; Since last year, due to the sudden change of market situation, the company's situation has turned sharply; I feel sorry for this step, but I still have to face the monitor and find the stage to play my ability again. "There is not only one answer to the same interview question, and the same answer is not valid in any interview situation. The key is to grasp the specific situation of the interview, consciously try to figure out the psychological background of the interviewer's questions, and then do what he likes.

Comments: Unless the salary is too low, or you just joined the company, don't take the salary as an excuse. "Seeking development" has also been heard too much by examiners. The reason for leaving should be designed according to everyone's real reason for leaving, but the answer must be sincere. When I really can't think of it, it can be said that I had to take a few months off because of something at home, and the company could not give it, so I resigned. This answer is generally acceptable to interviewers.

Please accept it if you can help. Thank you.