HR interviewed a programmer and told his former colleagues that he had a bad personality: which is more important, ability or personality?

Nowadays, when recruiting development positions, many internet companies not only require them to have the corresponding technology, but also require them to be able to integrate into the company in order to work normally! And some stricter companies will "recite" part of the interviewer's information to see if his personality is suitable for the company when they think that the interviewer's skills are up to standard!

Judging from the description of this HR, he interviewed a programmer with good ability, but when he recited his former colleagues, he found that his character was not so good, and he was wondering whether he should be admitted!

Some netizens think this statement is not credible: asking a former leader is just like asking an ex-girlfriend. Most of the comments are negative and will hide some advantages. This evaluation is one-sided and cannot be used as a basis for inferring character!

Some netizens think that others say that they are poor in character, but in fact they are poor in character. In order not to offend others, ordinary people will not slander their former colleagues even if they don't praise them! Moreover, employees generally have a probation period, during which they can also see how his character is. If it is good, it is naturally happy!

We will encounter many similar things in life. We only listen to unilateral opinions and make judgments directly, but often ignore the simplest and most effective methods, which is undoubtedly one-sided.

Welcome novice Java friends to join Java House: 79979,2590.

Free Java learning materials are provided in the group (there are many enterprise-level technologies, daily practice cases and other knowledge points, and I will also broadcast classes live in the group every night)