Which has a better development prospect, the documenter or the cost engineer?

Cost clerks are more promising than librarians.

First of all, the technical content of customers is higher than that of librarians. Many people around me are engaged in information or bidding after graduation, and even recruited as cost engineers to do these jobs.

Generally speaking, you can be familiar with the work required by the librarian in three months on site, but the cost is different and you need enough ability and knowledge. Librarians have to run a series of things such as signing and stamping, and all kinds of tedious work are busy enough.

From a professional point of view, the cost is also stronger than the information. Many schools have set up courses on project cost, and they also have relevant certificates to test. Cost engineers have more room for development.

At first, the income of librarians was higher than that of customers, but the situation changed a few years later. Nowadays, many builders and librarians want to switch to engineering cost, which is the future development besides the consideration of working environment. Related budget, settlement, audit, pre-tender estimate, etc. Cost engineers can do it in many ways, and the upper limit is higher than the data.

So in general, it is recommended to be a cost engineer. Although you may be busy and tired in the early stage, you will be promoted and raised if you master the skills skillfully. Engineering cost specialty is relatively good in the whole engineering category, and it is an industry with stable work, technical content and considerable salary.