We are the right side in the debate: generalists are more adaptable to competition in contemporary society than specialists. How to write a debate? Please help, urgent! urgent! ! !

All does not mean everything, all means many aspects. The so-called all-round refers to people who are outstanding in one aspect and understand in many aspects. This is the most ideal form of talent. In reality, it is not impossible. Such as Einstein etc.

There are limited social positions. Specialists will inevitably hang themselves on a tree, while generalists can adapt to social changes faster. After all, learning also takes time, and opportunities Only for those who are ready

Social division of labor seems to be a legitimate reason, but we have already stepped out of the era of simple mechanized mass production. Why should you rehire employees who don’t understand the overall situation and how to divide and cooperate? When I, who consider myself an expert, was typing this article, my computer suddenly broke down. Was there anything I could do?

I just talk about my own opinions casually. The so-called "appreciation of wonderful articles and analysis of doubts"

The ever-changing society and the cruel competition make everyone You must have a sense of crisis, and one more technology means more capital, and knowledge is interlinked. Each technology actually complements each other. Even if you are only using one technology now, your extensive knowledge reserve can make you better. Use that technology to your advantage, allowing you to be more creative.

Society needs innovation. Today's innovations often arise from interdisciplinary and fringe disciplines. Therefore, generalists have more innovative advantages than specialists.

As the saying goes: Having too many skills does not overwhelm the body. Society needs people with a broad knowledge platform. We need to adapt to society. It is beneficial to have everything.

Society needs innovative, broad-minded, and solid-founded talents with strong innovation capabilities.

All-rounders are better able to adapt to social competition. Only all-rounders can cope with all aspects of society and swim in the tide of society like a fish in water. You know more things yourself. For example, if you want to change your job now, it will be easier as soon as you take up the job. Don't learn from scratch. Comprehensive talents with a certain level of knowledge in all fields. Generalists have advantages in social competition: they are better able to integrate knowledge, know better about innovation, and are better able to adapt to social changes. Generalists are multi-skilled, multi-level, multi-ability talents who are better able to control themselves. A wooden board can help you cross a river, ten wooden boards can build a bridge, and thousands of wooden boards can ride the wind and waves. ”

Compared with specialists, generalists have a wider range of knowledge and a higher degree of knowledge integration. They have a certain outstanding skill in the industry they are engaged in, and it has become their core competitiveness. In addition, In the knowledge structure he has mastered, there are also various professional knowledge and skills that support core competitiveness.

Extensive knowledge does not mean that he is not good at everything. On the contrary, he has the ability to be good at everything. Conditions; in order to reach the top professional level in a certain aspect, he must first ensure that he has a broad knowledge base. The development of contemporary society is changing with each passing day, the requirements for talents are becoming more and more stringent, and the power of knowledge is becoming more and more shocking! Based on the positive opinions contained in the above rebuttal, we firmly believe that in contemporary society, seeking a blog is more conducive to personal development!

Modern society is characterized by variability, and the requirements for personal abilities in all aspects are gradually increasing! . How can the debate expert adapt to the saying that women are afraid of marrying the wrong man and men are afraid of getting into the wrong profession? Isn’t it more appropriate for us to have more choices and opportunities in the development of modern society? Rather, it’s about asking people who can do this thing. As long as they have the ability, shouldn’t they be limited to a few skills? So isn’t pursuing a doctorate more suited to the needs of society than pursuing a major? /p>

From a life perspective, it’s easier to understand.

Does a person who knows some medical skills in life have a safer life than a person who knows nothing about it? We don’t need everyone to be a doctor, but wouldn’t it be great if they knew a little basic medical skills and could solve minor ailments on their own in time? When it comes to personal development, health is the foundation. Wouldn’t knowing some medical skills be more conducive to health and personal development? Of course, I just gave a specific example. It is naturally better to know more about other common sense things such as diet, dressing, etiquette, etc. - it is more beneficial to life and work, that is, more beneficial to individuals. develop.

As far as learning is concerned, the education system in modern society increasingly advocates all-round development. From primary school to university, various subjects are taught at the same time. This is to cultivate compound talents. What cannot be ignored is that due to the shortcomings of the university system itself, a considerable number of university graduates are now only complex talents in form. If you ask liberal arts students what "uniform motion" is, or ask science and engineering students to talk about Shakespeare and his In drama, most of the time you can’t get accurate answers. Please don’t say that they don’t need to know this. Obviously, these “specialists” have entered the great division of labor in society, and they are simply unable to communicate with people in other industries. Without communication, knowledge will dry up sooner or later. Yes, then how can we talk about personal development? Why do we need to learn English now? Yes, many people have criticized our blind and crazy enthusiasm for learning foreign languages, but in fact, our work often requires the use of foreign languages. Is it enough for us to just learn Chinese well? On the basis of learning Chinese well, wouldn't it be more beneficial to learn one or more foreign languages? Wouldn’t it be more conducive to work in the future? Wouldn’t it be possible to meet some foreign people and cultures in life and broaden your horizons? What's more, under the general trend of globalization, learning foreign languages ??is also a need of the times. Then, you can’t just specialize in Chinese, you must also be knowledgeable and learn more.

You must know that with the rapid development of modern society, the requirements for personal talents have become higher and higher. Talents with only one skill are no longer what society needs. I also asked the other party to take a careful look at the recruitment market. If there are two people with the same skills, and if one of them has other skills, who do you think the boss would be more willing to hire? If the same salary is exchanged for an all-rounder, I believe such talents will be more competitive! Looking at our college students, those with double degrees have broader space and development prospects in finding jobs. In their spare time, college students are more willing to learn things other than their major, such as English, computers, etc. They will know that it is not enough to have one skill. Real talents must be knowledgeable. If there is only one skill, they will not be able to develop in society. If they are unable to adapt to social changes, they will be eliminated faster.

1. The definition of a generalist is too extreme, understanding a generalist as someone who knows everything.

2. Thinking that a specialist is better than a generalist in a certain specialized field Being more sophisticated and therefore better able to adapt to social competition ignores the characteristics of social competition and the requirements to adapt to social competition.

3. We only see the refinement of social division of labor, but do not see the higher requirements for integration brought about by refinement.

“If you have one wooden block, you can float across the river; if you have ten or hundreds of wooden blocks, you can build a bridge across the river; if you have thousands of wooden blocks, you can Build a ship to ride the wind and waves. “So, why don’t we use a variety of knowledge weapons to build a big ship to ride the waves? !