Job Recruitment Website - Ranking of immigration countries - What Australian benefits can I enjoy after immigrating to New Zealand?

What Australian benefits can I enjoy after immigrating to New Zealand?

New Zealand and Australia signed the Trans-tasman sea Agreement TTMRA), which clarified the mutual benefits that citizens of the two countries can enjoy.

You can search this agreement.

Related agreements:

1. Trans-tasman sea Mutual Recognition Agreement (TTMRA for short): This agreement was extended on the basis of CER and came into effect on May 1998. Therefore, the trade integration between Australia and New Zealand has been further promoted. According to the arrangement of this new agreement, goods that can be legally sold in one of the two countries can be sold in the other country in principle; Similarly, people who are registered to engage in a certain occupation in one country can also engage in the same occupation in another country (except medical practitioners).

2. "TTTA": allow each other's citizens to travel, work and live in their own country. This kind of free movement of people is the key factor of Australia-New Zealand bilateral close economic and social relations, which emphasizes the characteristics of "natural person to natural person" in the broader relationship between the two sides. At present, 300,000 people in New Zealand live in Australia, while 50,000 people in Australia live in New Zealand. About 654.38 million New Zealanders and Australians move between the two countries every year.

3. "Social Security Agreement": 1994 was signed, which stipulated that the two countries should equally share the cost of providing income support for citizens of the two countries living in each other's territory.

4. Australia/New Zealand Health Agreement: signed at 1986, allowing Australians and New Zealanders who come to the other country temporarily to get "immediate and necessary medical assistance" and enjoy the same treatment as nationals of the country of arrival. Later, the provisions were revised to exclude out-of-hospital medical assistance, but the requirement of providing out-of-hospital medical assistance was still retained (that is, out-of-hospital medical assistance did not enjoy national treatment).