Why is there no Asian or Chinese president in the United States?

First of all, you have to understand that not everyone can do it.

To be a president, besides having enough political means and wisdom,

It also needs to have enough influence on bureaucrats, consortia, business circles, media and people.

In other words, the pattern of the presidency is too big.

Without 30 years of experience as mayor, governor, senator, minister and business.

Unable to understand the overall situation and complex systems, different factions, complex political views and politicians who are both enemies and friends.

It would be a disaster for ordinary people to put it in that position.

At present, you can't find such talents in China or in Asia.

Generally speaking, Asians and China people have several characteristics:

Highly educated, usually engaged in engineers, doctors, teachers and other iron rice bowls.

Pay attention to family relations, pay attention to self-improvement, and pay less attention to social problems.

He has a strong tolerance for the political system and prefers to change his destiny through his own efforts rather than reform the political system.

Coupled with the influence of Confucian culture and Buddhist beliefs, it is different from American native Christian beliefs.

Asian culture is out of touch with mainstream American society. Americans don't understand what Asians think, and Asians are willing to live in closed circles.

So it is difficult for Asians to introduce a leader in this state.

Not to mention that letting Asian leaders represent Americans can convince more than half of Americans to vote for you.

As for the idea that the president of the United States is decided by a consortium, I am afraid I am deceiving myself.

It is true that the US presidential election is inseparable from money, and no poor people are elected.

The core of the problem is a loser who can't even manage himself well.

Why do people believe that he has the ability to manage a country?

No normal voter will vote for a loser to run this society.

It is too one-sided to say that the president of the United States represents the interests of the consortium.

For example, the trade problem between Trump and China has done great harm to Wall Street and consortia.

In this process, the consortium lost its own interests, so it is inevitable to take action to lobby the government.

But there are successes and failures. For example, there is nothing Wall Street can do this time. Lobbying the government does not mean manipulating politics.

And politicians want to dispose of or even split the consortium, as long as an administrative decree is enough.

For example, the United States fined Boeing $2.5 billion, and this military-industrial complex dared not fart.

Li Shangxun, president of South Korea's Samsung Company, was sentenced to three years' imprisonment. Even if Samsung lobbies the South Korean government, it will be a crucial moment for South Korea and Taiwan Province Province to compete for semiconductors. The imprisonment of Samsung family will make Korean semiconductor unable to catch up with Taiwan Province province.

But in the end, Samsung, a giant consortium that claims to account for 40% of South Korea's GDP, can only obey the government.