How to treat Jing M.Guo's patriotic remarks?

1. A negative evaluation of someone is tantamount to opposing his rights to XXX. Under this topic, quite a few people are defending Guo's patriotic rights. The point is that no one opposes his freedom of patriotism. We are just evaluating his behavior of posting this Weibo. Here, on behalf of myself, I only support Guo's freedom to send 1000 or 10000 patriotic articles every day. 2. Define the other side's position as 1% absolute, and define the remaining 99% as your own side. For example, one replied that it is a sensitive word to insist that Guo is a hypocritical person without evidence. The point is, we're not sure, what we're talking about is what Guo's bigger motivation is. This is like, sentencing someone needs 100% confirmation and conclusive evidence, but there is no need to discuss who is more suspicious, otherwise the police should not engage in reconnaissance. Therefore, since it is a question of possibility, it is necessary to make a concrete analysis. I totally agree with how to treat Jing M.Guo's patriotic remarks. -The definition of patriotism in anonymous user responses. However, the slogan patriotism is not necessarily insincere or hypocritical. Here I will take a step back, ignore the definition of patriotism, and only consider whether Guo wrote this passage out of interest or patriotism. Idea 1: Is patriotism related to its interests? If it has nothing to do with interests, then it is obviously not driven by interests. However, even if the interests are related, it cannot be said that his patriotism is for the benefit. In other words, this is a necessary and sufficient condition and an unnecessary condition. Specific to Guo, patriotism is obviously an attribute that is beneficial to him, and it is impossible to deny the possibility of Guo's interests. Idea 2: Look at a person's usual performance. At present, Gao's answer is to appeal to others "not to be presumed guilty" and treat others kindly. Well, I agree that we can be kind to strangers first. But please note that the premise here is a stranger, a person we are not familiar with. If you live in the same house as a habitual thief and happen to lose valuables, can you still look at it with a kind and pure eye as easily as the high ticket answer says? Don't engage in so-called "malicious" hype? So, back to the question, please ask yourself, is Guo a public figure whom we know nothing about? Haven't we all heard about his deeds since his debut? What's more, this person complained about the inconvenience of Olympic mathematics when he was a child. To be honest, I've seen too many other questions to criticize Guo's answers. When I saw this question calling on us to look at Guo from the perspective of the virgin, I even had the illusion that the way to open it was wrong. Therefore, based on the above two points, I tend to think that Guo made this remark out of interest-oriented motives. Again, I didn't say he couldn't be sincere. Naturally, you can have your own judgment, but please note that you should base yourself on this person's usual performance and consistent position, rather than various concepts of stealing and even grandstanding.