Job Recruitment Website - Ranking of immigration countries - What will happen in India if the Siliguri Corridor is cut off? Will it split?

What will happen in India if the Siliguri Corridor is cut off? Will it split?

In fact, there is no such thing as the Siliguri Corridor in Indian history. In fact, it was deliberately made by Britain to curb India's development after World War II.

After World War II, Britain's strength was obviously weakened. After the baptism of World War II, the comprehensive strength of British colonies around the world was obviously enhanced. Britain, whose strength is getting weaker and weaker, naturally cannot continue to rule these colonies, so many colonies began to break away from the rule of the suzerain country.

As a relatively strong colony of Britain in Asia, India is naturally unwilling to succumb to Britain. At that time, the area of the British East India Company included Pakistan, Bangladesh, India and parts of Myanmar, occupying almost the whole of South Asia.

During the British colonial period in India, in addition to cultural colonization, India's infrastructure was also improved. If Britain allows the whole East India Company to be independent, India will soon be completely separated from Britain, and Britain will naturally be unable to continue to extract oil and water from India.

In order to curb India's development, Britain adopted the policy of dividing up India. What was the reason given by Britain at that time? Alleviate racial conflicts within the East India Company? . The premise of India's partition is to manage Hinduism and Islam separately.

In order to contain Pakistan and India, Britain also deliberately divided Pakistan into East Pakistan and West Pakistan, and left the Kashmir issue to two wars. Pakistan has been attacked by India from both sides, and India has also divided Pakistan into two parts, so the contradiction between the two countries has been deepening and weakening each other to curb the development of India and Pakistan.

In the 1990s, in order to change the status quo, the Indian authorities provoked the relationship between East Pakistan and West Pakistan, and supported the independence of East Pakistan to become the present Bangladesh. So what does India have for Bangladesh? The grace of reconstruction? .

With India's current strength, it is impossible to annex Bangladesh, because once India and Bangladesh go to war, India is equivalent to being enemies of Pakistan and Bangladesh at the same time, and it is too much for India to attack from both sides. Although there are also contradictions between Islam and Hinduism between Bangladesh and India, there is no obvious hostile relationship between the two countries.

Today's Siliguri Corridor in India is a border corridor created by the borders of Bangladesh, Nepal, Sikkim and Bhutan, all of which were annexed and controlled by India.

If all these countries had given India the green light, India would not have this Siliguri Corridor. If the Siliguri Corridor is surrounded by countries that are absolutely hostile to India, it is not difficult to cut off the Siliguri Corridor. Moreover, if the Siliguri Corridor is cut off, the states in northeast India will definitely split.

Because the population in northeast India is mainly of Burmese descent and Tibetan descent in southern China, it is very different from Indian race. Moreover, there are great differences in religious beliefs and cultures, so Assam wanted to go out independently at the beginning of the founding of India.

In order to prevent Assam from splitting, India divided Assam into seven small states. At present, India has invaded southern Tibet, thus dividing India's northeast dialect into eight states. In order to prevent these States from reaching a consensus, India deliberately set up interest disputes among these States to restrict each other, thus reducing the control pressure of the Indian central government on this place.

Although India is unwilling to divide this land, it has not strengthened its construction because of its limited energy. There are no seaports in seven northeastern Indian States, and trade with the outside world must pass through India, which leads to extreme underdevelopment here. Northeast India is also one of the poorest and most chaotic areas in India.

In recent years, India has been migrating to seven states in northeast India on a large scale, squeezing the living space of indigenous people, which has led to more profound ethnic conflicts. So the political management here is very chaotic, and the independence of the aborigines is very high. However, due to the large number of Indian troops stationed in northeast China, there has been no large-scale independence movement in northeast India.

However, with the closer relationship between China and Bangladesh in the past two years, India has also begun to be anxious. After the trade volume between China and Bangladesh has increased, Bangladesh's economy has developed significantly and people's living conditions have improved significantly. Seven states in northeast India can directly feel the impact of this gap. People's independence will also become higher, which will make it more difficult for India to control this place.

Militarily, it is difficult to cut off the Silurian Corridor, because the Silurian Corridor is completely different from the traditional geographical corridor, such as the Longxi Corridor in ancient China, because it needs to pass through the Longxi Corridor to enter the western regions from the Central Plains, and other places have natural geographical barriers. Only by controlling Longxi can we increase the links between the mainland and the western regions. Once the Longxi Corridor is cut off, it is equivalent to cutting off the connection between the Central Plains and the Western Regions.

What about the Siliguri Corridor? In fact, it has no such function. The Siliguri Corridor is just a national border divided by politics and military affairs. If we want to cut off the faucet of the Siliguri Corridor, we must get the cooperation of Bhutan, Nepal and Bangladesh.

As mentioned above, the relationship between Bangladesh and India is very special now. Even if India can cut off the Siliguri Corridor now, India can send troops to seven northeastern States through Bangladesh.

Although Nepal and Bhutan seem to be independent, they have actually been infiltrated by India. Therefore, although the Siliguri Corridor looks very narrow, to completely control the Siliguri Corridor, we must first control Nepal and Bhutan.

It is unrealistic to control three countries at the same time in a peaceful state, but if all three countries have enemies with India and are willing to cut off this passage, it can still be brought to the people of seven northeastern Indian States. Freedom? Yes

To sum up, if the Siliguri Corridor in India is really cut off, the seven states in northeast India may not be independent on the surface for a short time, but they will never obey the arrangement of the central government of India. With the passage of time, India's rule over the seven northeastern States will become weaker and weaker, so the independence of the seven northeastern States will become an inevitable event. It's just that this may just be an illusion. After all, it is very important to cut off the Siliguri corridor.