How to solve the "difficulty in entering school" for children of migrant workers?

I studied in Zhengzhou for nine years, but I was blocked from high school. This year, there may be nearly 10,000 children of migrant workers in Zhengzhou who are worried about their way out. According to national regulations, the compulsory education stage is mainly solved by the local government, and the high school education stage is mainly solved by the local government. CPPCC members believe that migrant children should enjoy the same treatment and standards as urban children. In recent years, the enrollment of migrant workers' children is a long-standing problem. I finally entered school, but after finishing junior high school, I was rejected by public high schools. It is said that you can attend private high schools, but the high tuition fees make the children of migrant workers discouraged; Moreover, a few private high schools can't accommodate so many children of migrant workers.

Is it completely unreasonable for urban public high schools to refuse the children of migrant workers to enter school? Not exactly. Basic education in China is based on the principle of territoriality. The state's educational funds for the children of migrant workers are allocated to local governments, so local governments should of course provide them with educational services. However, the government of the inflow place really has no responsibility to provide educational services for the children of migrant workers. Some people may ask: Then why can primary schools and junior high schools accept children of migrant workers? This is because primary and junior high schools are compulsory. In order to fulfill its legal obligations, the government has to adopt compulsory policies. In other words, the government and public schools in the inflow areas have assumed obligations that did not belong to them. Because of this, their attitude of accepting migrant workers' children is not positive-it is said that "all of them have come to the door", but there are many non-institutional obstacles, and many migrant workers' children still cannot enter public schools. Governor Li Chengyu put forward in the "Government Work Report": "Seriously solve the problems of schooling for children of migrant workers and large classes in some primary and secondary schools in the city." How to solve it specifically? Of course, it is necessary to increase investment in education, vigorously develop private education, and let the development of urban education keep pace with urbanization. But the internal conflicts of the system always exist. So, how can we fundamentally solve the problem? The theory of "education voucher" put forward by Nobel Prize winner and famous American economist Friedman more than 50 years ago may be a "key". The principle of this theory is: to change the current educational investment mode of direct subsidy from the government to public schools, and to allocate the funds that should have been invested in education to each student after conversion, so that students can freely choose to attend any school recognized by the government (whether public or private) with vouchers. After receiving the education voucher, the school can exchange the value of the education voucher for education funds from the government. According to this theory, wherever a child goes, his educational welfare can be obtained. It is also fair to the government and schools in the inflow area. As early as a few years ago, Changxing County, Zhejiang Province, Jianli County, Hubei Province and other places have practiced this theory and achieved good results. Of course, to implement the "education voucher" system, the education funds of local governments must be sufficient and guaranteed. During the period of social transformation, population mobility, education, medical care and social security are all facing problems such as "docking"-this is indeed a test of the government's ruling ability.