Job Recruitment Website - Ranking of immigration countries - Why is Britain frequently attacked by terrorists?

Why is Britain frequently attacked by terrorists?

The perpetrators of the recent terrorist attacks are not from new immigrant communities, but typical two or three generations of immigrants. Legally speaking, these attackers are 100% British citizens, and even if they are found to have extremist tendencies, they cannot be deported back to their places of origin.

Recently, another terrorist attack occurred in the British capital London. A white van collided with pedestrians on London Bridge and drove all the way to nearby Boluo Market, one of the most famous markets in London. Three terrorists jumped out of the car and rushed into a bar in the market, stabbing customers with knives. It has been confirmed at the scene that three terrorists were killed, seven civilians were killed and 48 people were injured and hospitalized, many of whom were in critical condition. This is the third recent terrorist attack in Britain, and the extremist organization "Islamic State" quickly admitted that it did it after the incident.

The British Prime Minister subsequently issued a statement declaring that he would declare war on "Islamic extremism", implying that the immigration policy would be tightened. In addition, the British Prime Minister particularly stressed the need to cooperate with international leaders to stop the communication networks used by terrorists and reach an international agreement on network supervision.

This is the strongest statement made by the British government against the background terrorist forces in the Middle East in history, and it also marks that Britain will follow the example of Eastern European countries and adopt stricter control measures against immigrants in the Middle East. Although the British government is prepared to take tougher measures, I am afraid it will not be very effective against the recent endless terrorist attacks.

As early as 20 15, Britain prepared for terrorist attacks and began to send armed police patrols in public places such as stations and shopping centers to ensure the safety of the people. After the terrorist attack outside the parliament building in March this year, the British government even asked the national medical system to prepare for emergency medical intervention in large-scale attacks, including increasing the plasma reserve and increasing the first-aid drug reserve for personal injuries such as gunshot wounds and burns. In addition, the British police randomly equipped armed police on key trains to deter terrorists and prevent possible attacks. This is a preventive measure against the previous terrorist attacks on Belgian international trains.

In fact, since the 1960s, the British military police system has been cracking down on terrorist organizations such as the Irish Peace Corps, and successfully curbed many attacks planned by Al Qaeda after the September 2006 1 1 incident. If only from the experience of anti-terrorism operations, Britain's powerful departments can be regarded as experienced old anti-terrorism forces, why can't they stop the recent attacks?

The perpetrators of the recent terrorist attacks are not from new immigrant communities, but typical two or three generations of immigrants. Legally speaking, these attackers are 100% British citizens, and even if they are found to have extremist tendencies, they cannot be deported back to their places of origin. To make matters worse, because Britain has not restricted religious people from spreading extreme ideas because of political correctness for many years, immigrant families are very vulnerable to the temptation of these extreme priests.

198 1 Abu hamzah, an Egyptian who immigrated to Britain, has been spreading extreme ideas for nearly 20 years. His Finsbury Park Mosque in London is regarded as a stronghold of British extremism and has long recruited and incited extremists. Until 2003, the British police finally raided the mosque, arrested abu hamzah, and found biochemical protection equipment and some experimental equipment that could be used to make ricin.

Despite the successful elimination of abu hamzah gangs, so-called spiritual leaders who spread extreme ideas have blossomed everywhere in Britain. To make matters worse, Britain and France have become the main manpower exporters of the "Islamic State", and a large number of second-and third-generation immigrants have become followers of extreme ideas. The executioner in the "Islamic State" beheading video speaks with a British accent. Now, the "Islamic State" is losing ground in the Middle East, and its propaganda department requires its followers in Europe to "fight on the spot", that is, launch terrorist attacks in Europe at any time. According to estimates by British intelligence agencies, there are now more than 23,000 extremists in Britain, of whom 3,000 are regarded as "threats".

This kind of local young people who are deeply bewitched by extreme thoughts are not only more hidden, but also sheltered by the community and family. It is difficult to completely stop the attack by relying solely on powerful departments to prevent death. In the London Bridge attack, the British police arrived at the scene ten minutes later and killed all the attackers, but there were still many casualties at the scene. In order to curb this wave of attacks, the British police must restart the past intelligence infiltration work against the Irish Peace Forces, send intelligence personnel with high-risk community activities, and continue to infiltrate communities full of extreme ideas. By continuously disintegrating the spread chain of extremist ideas, we will destroy the soil on which extremists live.