Is the campus activities of the debate competition more conducive to the cultivation of students' personal ability or the improvement of class cohesion? I am the former.

Are campus activities more conducive to students' personal ability or to enhancing class cohesion? If you are the former, first of all, it shows that the two are not in conflict. (Because the other side has defined and stipulated that' campus activities' will expand, that is, schools (or school-level organizations) with classes as the unit, it is obviously biased towards the latter, that is, enhancing class cohesion (which is also the "orthodox" purpose of activities), you can gain a foothold from the following points:

1. In the activity, everyone will make collective suggestions and everyone will be promoted in their own field;

2. At the same time of activities, everyone enhanced their feelings for each other, which is also a manifestation of their ability to improve;

3. Class cohesion is the result of Qi Xin's concerted efforts, and it is one of the manifestations of improving everyone's ability (communication, communication, coordination, etc.). );

Another debate, when defining, expand the cohesion of the class a little, so that it can be related to your' personal ability'.

The above is for reference only.