Introduction to the incident of male professors interviewing female students

Recently, male professors interviewing female students has caused heated discussions and has been criticized by countless netizens.

When interviewing a female graduate student, look first at the breasts, secondly at the face... and fourthly. "My beauty standards: first look at the breasts, secondly at the face, thirdly at the butt and fourthly at the legs." These shocking words came from Beijing Foreign Studies University Professor Qiao Mu . He published an article "Things About Male Professors Interviewing Girls" to talk about his selection criteria when interviewing graduate students.

“When looking at women, men and women have different standards, and men also have different preferences. My aesthetics are to look at the breasts first, the face secondly, the buttocks thirdly, and the legs fourthly. In addition to one entrance and one exit After seeing the whole picture, once you sit down, you mainly focus on the first two items. "Recently, a news story about a male professor interviewing a female student attracted the attention of netizens, which shocked everyone and aroused their anger and condemnation. In addition to the accusations from many netizens, there are still many voices that support Qiao Mu. "He is very real, and what he said is the truth." "This is the reality."

"My beauty standards: first look at the breasts, secondly look at the face, thirdly look at the buttocks and fourthly look at the legs." This is not It comes from a color novel, not a talent show. These shocking words came from Professor Qiao Mu of Beijing Foreign Studies University. A few days ago, he published an article titled "Things About Male Professors Interviewing Girls" to talk about his selection criteria when interviewing graduate students.

“One time, a girl wore a deep V dress. I don’t know whether it was because of the hot weather or because she was nervous. She was moaning and panting, and her breasts were bulging. The examiner is also a human being. I didn’t even know what to ask. She said What?"

In addition to the accusations from many netizens, there are still many voices that are very negative. "He is very real, and what he said is the truth." "Reality is like this." Accusing Qiao Mu is not to cover up the reality of gender discrimination, but to condemn him as a professor. When his gender bias is combined with the power in his hands, it leads to power Abuse without reflection or regret. Political correctness is not a utopia constructed by us to paralyze ourselves and other people, but when gender bias infringes upon rights and interests, accountability can be based on evidence, so that discriminators have something to fear.

@BFSUQiaomu’s article "What happened when male professors interviewed girls" has confusing concepts. As an interviewer, he is extremely unprofessional, but he is still complacent about his "true temperament", which is very typical.

First, "gender and appearance" should not be a factor affecting admissions, but they are listed openly, which shows how poor China's awareness of equal rights is. (Everyone who studies in the United States has read the university's "Non-Discrimination Statement", which is based on Articles 6 and 7 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as well as a series of subsequent laws and regulations. Enterprises and institutions that receive federal financial aid All units must abide by this provision and may add equality clauses based on the characteristics of the unit.)

Secondly, when it comes to gender, Qiao Mu said that women have an "advantage" in terms of quantity and performance, but in fact, women have an "advantage" in terms of quantity and performance. During the "admissions" process, not only did they not discourage the gender discrimination of "accepting boys after interviews, while girls were selected and brutally eliminated" (it is implicitly based on female professors' same-sex repulsion, I don't know whether it is true or not), they also summarized it as an "advantage". This is a deliberate confusion of concepts. Since being a woman is a factor that can make someone lose the election, what is the "advantage"? If the huge disadvantages imposed on female candidates due to gender discrimination are not recognized at all as "disadvantages" and are distorted into "advantages", it will be impossible to make any changes on this basis.