How can we be fair?

Zhu Wen has been busy with two sessions these days. At this year's two sessions, related education issues have once again become hot topics discussed by many delegates and members. Many of them once again pointed out that the current unfairness in education is unfair in the college entrance examination plan formulated by the Ministry of Education and unfair in college entrance examination admission. So what is the relative fairness of education? A representative from Henan intends to unite dozens of representatives and put forward a "national unified examination paper". Others say that the college entrance examination can only be fair if the household registration restriction is abolished. The current college entrance examination is unfair, which is well shown from the data. These are caused by many reasons, such as uneven regional development. Then the relative fairness of college entrance examination admission is still difficult to find a way out. If students all over the country take the same test paper, it will inevitably lead to another kind of unfair education, and at the same time, the phenomenon of "college entrance examination immigration" will continue. First of all, if students from all over the country use the same test paper in the college entrance examination and arrange admission to colleges and universities according to their scores, then the candidates who are greatly affected are not Beijing and Shanghai, but the western regions with relatively backward education. Then some powerful people in the west must find ways to "immigrate" their children to some places with developed education. What about ordinary children? Is this fair to them? The underdeveloped areas in China are still widespread, so the impact will be even greater. Secondly, if the national college entrance examination papers are unified, the quality education that the country has carried out for so many years will disappear overnight. The whole country will reproduce the flame of "exam-oriented education". As a result, the quality of education will decline, and some students with "high scores and low abilities" will exist on a large scale. Therefore, if the household registration restriction of the college entrance examination is abolished, the current order will definitely cause great confusion. The mobility of college entrance examination applicants is estimated to be similar to that of Spring Festival travel rush, so where to register is more reasonable? Therefore, it is unrealistic. It is not that the education department deliberately makes education unfair, nor that the education department does not try to reform. The key is that it is difficult to find some relatively fair methods at present. At present, the best way is to expand the autonomy of college enrollment, adjust measures to local conditions and teach students in accordance with their aptitude, so that they can recruit students suitable for their own school education. On the basis of such a "two-way choice", it should be fairer. However, we must have a good supervision system and the process of independent enrollment in colleges and universities to ensure its fairness. In recent years, the number of self-enrollment in some universities has increased relatively, especially in famous universities such as Tsinghua and Peking University. At the same time, the number of college entrance examinations in Beijing and Shanghai is decreasing year by year. Therefore, these are all good trends. Students in Beijing, Shanghai and other places are more likely to go to colleges and universities, so on average, the college admission rate is relatively high. Then, if students from Beijing and Shanghai want to go to famous schools such as Tsinghua, Peking University and Fudan University, there will be great competition. Contrary to what they said, they can go to Tsinghua Peking University in more than 500 minutes in Beijing. With the development of China's economy, some educational information and resources will be optimized accordingly, and a large part of resources will be enjoyed by the whole people, such as online teaching and online books, which are conducive to the growth of their own culture, and you don't have to go to the classrooms and libraries of some famous universities to get these. There are still many ways to make progress. Although these all need a certain process, they are at least as realistic as those members' suggestions of releasing household registration and the national college entrance examination papers. The progress of a country, the development of education is a matter of course, and relative fairness will certainly improve with the development of economy and society.