Job Recruitment Website - Ranking of immigration countries - Is Martin Luther King’s I Have a Dream plagiarized? If so, can you tell me the author's name and the title of the article?

Is Martin Luther King’s I Have a Dream plagiarized? If so, can you tell me the author's name and the title of the article?

Martin Luther King was assassinated in April 1968. Whether it was during his lifetime or in the twenty years after his death, almost no one noticed that he might be suspected of plagiarism. The only exception is Ira G. Zepp, who pointed out in his doctoral thesis completed in 1971 that King's autobiographical work "Stride Toward Freedom" (1958) plagiarized two famous theological works, but this was not published. Thesis did not attract any attention at the time. The clues that actually led to the outbreak of plagiarism were unearthed in research by a group of progressive scholars who supported King. They were totally caught off guard.

In early 1985, King's widow Coretta Scott King, on behalf of the "Martin Luther King Center" (she was the founder and president of the center), invited Stanford University historian Clayborne Carson to host the launch. The Martin Luther King, Jr. Papers Project, whose main goal is to edit, ascertain and publish an authoritative and reliable Collected Works of Martin Luther King, Jr. (planned to be published*** Fourteen volumes, currently the sixth volume has been published). Under the chairmanship of Professor Carson, this project was supported by the Center's cooperation with Stanford University and received a grant of US$500,000 from the NEH Foundation in 1986. However, during the annotation research process of the project, Jin’s plagiarism problem gradually came to light. This makes the editor encounter many difficulties: Should the plagiarized articles be selected into the upcoming "Collected Works"? How do you communicate to readers the unattributed citations in these articles? Should every instance of “textual appropriation” be labeled? Do you want to determine which example constitutes plagiarism? Although some people later accused Professor Carson of "attempting to cover up the truth," he himself tried to clarify in his memoirs: "No one in the team objected to the disclosure of our conclusions about Jin's plagiarism" at that time. Everyone was just concerned about "how to present these findings." "There were intense and extensive discussions. The manuscript project team discovered the first case of plagiarism in 1988, but kept the information strictly within the project team until they could determine the scope and severity of the problem. By September 1989, Professor Carson began to negotiate with King's wife and the project advisory committee. After "many difficult discussions", they finally made two decisions in October: First, the book will be officially published in the "Collected Works" "" will indicate every plagiarism suspicion in the form of editorial notes; secondly, before the publication of the first volume of "Collected Works", a separate academic paper will be published to fully discuss Jin's plagiarism issue. Professor Carson very much hopes that his team will have the right to first publish this news, and plans to publish their research findings for the first time in academic journals rather than public media. This is to present the facts fairly, comprehensively and objectively, and to avoid possible hype and misleading