What are the writing skills of the summary paragraph of personal statement PS?

PS is not a test of English or composition. Don't pay too much attention to writing and lose focus. You can ask a friend with good English to help you revise it, but don't exceed your English strength too much. PS is a personal statement. You should talk about why you chose this major and school, your enthusiasm for this major, your views on this field, and your future plans.

A PS is generally about 800- 1000 words (or the school you apply for has a specified number of words). Some candidates think that since it is a personal statement, they should fully introduce themselves, and the long speech has no focus. The judges read hundreds of PS articles every day. If your PS can't get to the point, let readers know you quickly and introduce your parents and grandparents one by one. Such PS will certainly not arouse people's interest and will soon be thrown aside. PS is to be concise, let readers have a comprehensive understanding of you in a short time, select representative examples, and fully prove their Excellence in a limited space.

Mechanically apply PS writing template or someone else's PS. As a member of the jury, you should read hundreds of PS articles every day. For example, like most applicants, you first sum up your background and then point out the major and school you want to apply for. Although there is nothing wrong with it, it is very unified for them and it is difficult to arouse people's interest in such a familiar PS. PS should have their own personality, and schools should have distinctive students. No school wants a mediocre student, and articles in models are easy to be vulgar. Imagine that if you have a novel beginning and the content of the article fluctuates, the judges will be more interested in reading it carefully, and your ps will be very real and innovative. PS had better be well-structured, detailed and logical.

Can't choose materials reasonably and analyze them properly. Applicants should consider the professional field of application, what kind of applicants the other party is interested in, and so on. How to choose materials properly is very important. As long as the problem is correctly analyzed and things are described from an appropriate angle.

I don't see my potential. Many candidates are excellent, but because they can't treat themselves correctly, they just mention their experiences in PS in general, so they really can't expand and explore their excellent potential. It would be better if they can adapt to your professional field.

Dishonesty, exaggerating and fabricating one's own abilities and experiences, once discovered, will have disastrous consequences. Appropriate optimization can be done, but it should be targeted, and don't ask questions without understanding, so you can't justify yourself.

Slogan-style empty talk, especially when writing their own motives for going abroad, many people will write such empty talk as how backward China is in a certain respect and how advanced the United States is, so they want to study in the United States, flatter the United States blindly, and even feel a little idolized, but in fact they will resent it. You should think about why you want to go abroad. The other person needs to see the real you, not a person who just expresses his determination and shouts slogans, and is hypocritical and unrealistic. Therefore, the applicant can combine his own personal experience and experience to be true and credible, not just full of empty talk. In addition, you can emphasize your plan to return to China after studying abroad, which can dispel the visa officer's doubts about your immigration tendency.

The case of Columbia University

CMU

University of Pennsylvania