Why do I object to Buddhism?

Editor's note: Buddhism is not a religion, but the education of Buddhism. It has its own complete world outlook, but its understanding of the origin of the world conflicts with our local beliefs. So far, only our ancestors' understanding of the universe may be the closest to the truth. Jealous people can still adhere to their own worldview, and we must and should be able to adhere to our own worldview. For foreign things, we can only stay at the application level. That is to say, middle school is the body and foreign learning is the use. Finally, we will build our faith into the most perfect and impeccable belief system. Before getting to the point, let me give you two examples: I heard that western countries began to legislate for Chinese medicine, which was a good thing at first, but later I learned that the west did not accept the concept of Chinese medicine, but legislated for herbs and acupuncture respectively, and it was not aimed at China, but divided into "European herbs", "Indian herbs" and "China herbs", and acupuncture was also divided into "American acupuncturists" and "Korean acupuncturists". The concept of treating patients as a whole in Chinese medicine has not been directly absorbed, but has been developed and perfected. The Chinese medicine system was originally perfect. I don't know whether the band-aid was inspired by China's plaster, but I know that Chinese medicine alone can be divided into pills, plaster, decoction, powder, etc., and the treatment methods are very rich. It can be said that we all have western medicine today, but we may not have some western medicine. In this case, westerners also try to annex Chinese medicine with their western medicine system. It can be seen how much they are unwilling, and how cowardly we are. This reminds me of another example. Ancient Chinese architecture was a frame structure. After introducing western learning, we began to learn western architecture and gave up developing traditional architecture. Later, western architects found the frame structure, which was considered as a major breakthrough in the history of architecture and especially suitable for high-rise buildings. While admiring the greatness of western architects, our architects studied with trepidation. By citing these two examples, I want to show that foreign things can and should be actively absorbed, but they must be incorporated into our own system, which is the real absorption. Some people may object to my saying this. For example, westerners don't believe in jealousy at first, but later they absorbed it all. That's because they were barbarians when they invaded Rome, and they didn't have their own systematic things in their beliefs. When they become civilized people, the absorption of foreign cultures, as I said earlier, must be broken first, and then the useful fragments will be embedded into their own systems. So there may be some objections. Didn't the Romans believe in the Greek gods before, but later they converted to jealousy? The problem is that the Greek religion of the gods is also foreign to the Romans, and then it is admitted that the jealousy religion is forced by practical reasons. It is for this reason that after the demise of Eastern Rome, no one dares to explicitly say that he is a descendant of the Romans. Because believing in jealousy doesn't mean that he is descended from Rome. I read the Diamond Sutra a long time ago, and then I was inspired by Master Shi Jingqing's Understanding Buddhism. Later, due to the study of shakuhachi, I happened to meet some masters of Pure Land Sect (my teacher is also a Pure Land Sect) and the masters of Japanese Light and Shade Temple. Later, after reading Hokkekyo, I got a preliminary understanding of Buddhism. Buddhism is not a religion, but the education of Buddhism. It has its own complete world outlook, but its understanding of the origin of the world conflicts with our local beliefs. Because of this, I oppose Buddhism. In fact, all our sages have already discussed the useful truth in it. Even if it is the truth, it will be universal, and our descendants will naturally think of it one day. Why should we say that these are Buddhist views? In fact, not only Buddhism, but also any kind of belief, including Marxism today, must have an overall exposition of the whole universe. Every belief is a complete system. So far, only our ancestors' understanding of the universe may be the closest to the truth. Jealous people can still adhere to their own worldview, and we must and should be able to adhere to our own worldview. For foreign things, we can only stay at the application level. That is to say, middle school is the body and foreign learning is the use. Finally, we will build our faith into the most perfect and impeccable belief system.