There is no reason for the outbreak of World War II.

I think war, as a relic of the 20th century, is totally meaningless today with nuclear deterrence, political stability, unified world market and frequent international organizations. Personally, I think war is nothing more than the appearance and political behavior of competing for resources. Now resources are more reasonably dominated by the market, political behavior decreases with the emergence of state organizations, and the role of war is replaced. The emergence of war is not conducive to the construction and development of any country, and I believe that all countries will try their best to avoid war.

Many wars in the past were the result of antinomy. For example, a war must end with a war. In order to end the war, people must endure the pain of the war. However, as I mentioned earlier, the role of war has been replaced by the fact that international organizations and markets are unified. This theory is no longer contradictory, that is to say, war does not need to end, but when it is useless, it should be abandoned.

For example, the conflict between the DPRK and the ROK is in full swing, but I personally think it is unlikely that there will be a war between the DPRK and the ROK.

First, do you remember 1996? That year, China launched missiles into the waters of Taiwan Province Province, and President Clinton immediately sent an aircraft carrier to the area. Suddenly, a tense war between China and the United States in Taiwan Province Province was imminent. Later, China's military action against Taiwan Province Province fell through, which fully showed that Taiwan Province Province was only a pawn in the game between China and the United States, and also showed that the overall situation of East Asia had been dominated by China and the United States. The two countries wrestle with each other, but they dare not act rashly, and they will not agree to any excessive behavior. Today, the situation in the DPRK and the ROK is also 1996. The DPRK and the ROK are already tense, but neither China nor Japan nor the United States will sit idly by. Now China is actively mediating between the two countries, and I believe that the DPRK will go out cautiously.

Second, we can look at the problem through the analysis of the past Cheonan incident. I have every reason to believe that most of North Korea's military actions against South Korea are only intended to mediate the domestic people's emotions, incite historical hatred and divert people's anger at political and economic mistakes (for example, the last currency reform in North Korea led to the loss of a large number of middle class wealth). Today, we can also think that once North Korea starts a war, it will lose all its benefits and the hereditary sick woman of Chairman Kim will collapse. North Korea was condemned by the international community, China and Russia scoffed at North Korea, and the United States and Japan used this as an excuse to attack North Korea. In such a bad international environment, North Korea will definitely quit.

It can be fully seen from the above that the world political structure is basically stable now, and it can also be basically asserted that no country can do whatever it wants.