High school history, master fast forward, teacher help thank you very much.

Why is it said that it doesn't have too many constraints?

Explanation: 1. The political premise for the industrial revolution to break out in Britain was the political stability in Britain. The autocratic monarchy has been abolished, the bourgeois constitutional monarchy has been implemented, and the country has vigorously developed the capitalist economy. Of course, there are not many obstacles.

if you want to have a deeper understanding.

There are several conditions for the industrial revolution

1. The political premise has just been said

2. The cotton textile industry in Britain was very developed in the early stage, and a large number of farmers were unemployed. Only when they entered the factory to support themselves, they needed a large number of workers during the rapid development of the factory

3. Capital and raw materials for industrial production. The capital accumulation in Britain in the early stage was very strong. In the mid-18th century, it became an empire that never set in the sun. Sea plunder accumulates a lot of capital. There are colonies all over the world, which provide them with their original places of origin, such as India. 4. The new route movement in the market gradually connects the world into a whole. The products produced by Britain can be sold to their own countries and their colonies, and the main bulk of them have become dumping places for their goods in colonial colonies. 5. The application of new technologies, such as Jenny spinning machine, has provided it with a large number of high and new technologies.

The various production departments of cotton textile industry have realized mechanization. Is this mechanization the same as that in the mid-19th century, which marked the completion of the industrial revolution?

explanation: it's really different. You just need to understand that the industrial revolution was first produced in the cotton textile industry.

If you have to struggle, it can be understood as the same. In the 184s, Britain took the lead in completing the industrial revolution, which was marked by machine production, that is, mechanized mass production.

2, You don't have to worry about this question.

State intervention in the economy is actually the process from liberal capitalism to monopoly capitalism. Monopoly capitalism is what we call the imperialist stage.

The first state intervention was taken in the United States in 1933, that is, the Roosevelt New Deal.

Can you type the text completely and let me help you see? Anyway, you are confused. Sometimes you don't need to think about something when you study. Yao complex

3, The only difference between the old and the new democratic revolution is that the leadership class is different from the old: the bourgeois new democratic revolution is led by the proletariat.

Both the old and the new revolutionary tasks are anti-imperialist and anti-feudal and belong to the bourgeois democratic revolution.

It may be difficult to understand the nature of the revolution. Let me say more.

Look at the typical bourgeois revolutions in various countries in world history, such as Britain in 164. The French Revolution of 1789

was an anti-feudalism

Why did you come to China to become two

Because modern China became a semi-semi society, the task of the revolution was to oppose both domestic feudal forces

and foreign aggression, that is, imperialism

, but in essence, it all belonged to the bourgeois revolution

Then why was it led by the proletariat

Because capitalism in China is very simple. The national bourgeoisie (represented by Dr. Sun Yat-sen) was not strong enough to finally complete this double-opposition task

After its failure, it gradually withdrew from the historical stage

The May 4th Movement in p>1919 marked the strength of the working class on the historical stage. The theory of the working class was not the Three People's Principles, but Marxism-Leninism. Therefore, in 1921, the revolutionary movement in China was led by the proletarian party of China.

Since the leadership classes have changed, Xinmin was used to distinguish them. . . . In place of

, in fact, in the words of ordinary people, the medicine has been changed.

So your teacher said that it was all bourgeois revolution.

Either he didn't explain it clearly.

Or you didn't listen carefully in class.

Hehe

And if you are careful, you will find that

when New China was founded in p>1949, we didn't call it a socialist country.

We called it a new democratic country, which means that up to now we are new democratic countries