Why should we admire people like Mandela and Gandhi when studying history?

Because people with western historical views worship such figures, the capital groups behind western politicians like such non-violent and uncooperative leaders.

Only when every country is full of such figures can the capital shadow government behind the west and the west always stand at the top of the earth's food chain and control all countries in the world forever.

Is it because they symbolize democracy and freedom? Have they made the country a better place? Neither, just because their actions are in the interest of the west.

What does non-violence and non-cooperation mean? Is to strive for the national independence of one's own country by means of non-resistance and non-cooperation. In the eyes of China people, this kind of thing is impossible. Everyone in China knows that this idea is too naive. Without the baptism of blood and fire, how can such a goal be achieved?

Why did Gandhi succeed in India? The fundamental reason is the decline of British national strength. In fact, India is a springboard for British colonial activities in China. The whole of India is nothing but rich spices and cheap labor. It was not Gandhi's hunger strike that made the British.

During World War II, Britain forced conscription in India to ensure its superiority in the war, which made India leave Britain and the independence movement almost swept India. Although Britain still retained nominal sovereignty over India at that time, it had no way to control India for a long time.

Once India chose to gain independence through war, Britain had no spare energy to maintain its rule over vast areas of India, so it simply made concessions and directly let India achieve national independence. While leaving this laurel to Gandhi who didn't get into trouble, he also conveniently divided the Indian Peninsula into several countries and let them fight for themselves.

What was South Africa like in the hands of Boers before Mandela was elected president? It is the leading power in Africa, and its economic aggregate and military strength crush the whole of Africa. All African countries follow the example of South Africa. It used to be the sixth power in the world, and its comprehensive national strength was not lost to European countries at that time.

At this time, the Boers in South Africa want to have a place in the world. So they developed nuclear weapons under the pressure of European and American countries. As a result, European and American countries initiated sanctions against South Africa.

At that time, racial problems in South Africa were serious, and European and American countries actively supported Mandela, which aggravated racial conflicts. Finally, the Boer government in South Africa collapsed and the Mandela government was established. South Africa's wealthy whites have transferred a large number of assets out of South Africa, resulting in a basically empty shell state of South Africa's domestic economy.

Because in the eyes of western powers, this existence is not in their interests, and they urgently need a Mandela to destroy this country. Mandela did, and history stopped at this moment. South Africa has been in power for more than 20 years, and there are no new roads, and the original facilities are damaged and unattended. It is "completely different" from the previous era, and its development is stagnant. Developed African lions have become African chicken ribs and can no longer pose a threat to western interests.

Democracy and freedom advocated by the west are just a set of writing tools, and the interests behind them are their ultimate goal. What they hope is to set a benchmark by publicizing these "heroes" who do not resist, so that the world can fall at the feet of capital and let it plunder.