What is the purpose of those who say that the history of ancient Egypt has been tampered with?

California is the second largest city and one of the world-famous marine worlds, with many famous beaches over 1 10 km. American investment immigrants: the city with the first quality of life in the United States.

As we all know, the first-hand materials for studying history are historical documents. No matter how advanced archaeology and detection technology are, historical documents are always the first in archaeology, and science and technology are only auxiliary. Only by reading historical documents can we understand what happened in a certain area.

If there are no historical documents handed down from generation to generation, and they can't read Chinese characters, the Japanese and Koreans point to the China building and say that it was left by our ancestors, and there is nothing we can do.

Therefore, as He Xin said, the civilization that has been truly passed down and has a history of trust is China, because China's words have not been broken for thousands of years, and later generations can understand the words of 3,000 years ago. Other civilizations rely more on "archaeology", which is speculative, one-sided and unreliable, and can only be regarded as "stories" and "myths" rather than "history of trust".

Ancient Egyptian characters belong to the "language of death" 2,000 years ago. Later, what champollion and others called "the interpretation of ancient Egyptian characters" was pure fabrication and speculation, not a belief in history. Westerners fabricate the history of ancient Egypt by tampering with the interpretation of ancient Egyptian characters.

Westerners falsifying the history of ancient Egypt is actually related to falsifying the history of ancient Greece:-.

In the so-called "Renaissance", he came into contact with China culture on a large scale. For hundreds of years, he spared no effort to copy and fabricate a story from Ancient Times. In the meantime, after the Jesuits had a deeper contact with China culture, they found that the historical view of the Old Testament was untenable in time, so they kept forging the chronology of ancient Egypt to push the history of ancient Egypt further in the past ... Said pointed out: "No matter from the perspective of art, science and the sense of supersaturation of * * *, the role of Egypt has been constantly becoming various" actions "with world historical significance on the stage.

A new world hegemony, which originated in modern Europe, can naturally show its strength to the world by capturing Egypt, legitimize their aggression and write down colonial history.

Once Egypt is captured, the fate of this African country will be combined with the whole of Europe.

In addition, once in Egypt, the earliest ancestors in Europe were only Homer, Alexander the Great, Caesar, Plato and Pythagoras, but now they can be traced back to the older sages in the East.

In short, the value of the existence of the East lies not in its connection with the real world of modern Europe, but in its connection with the distant past of Europe.

This is what I mentioned, a pure example: the "textual" and "schematic" attitude of the west towards the eastern world.

"Westerners' forgery of ancient Egyptian history is actually related to the forgery of ancient Greek history:-.

In the so-called "Renaissance", he came into contact with China culture on a large scale. For hundreds of years, he spared no effort to copy and fabricate a story from Ancient Times. In the meantime, after the Jesuits had a deeper contact with China culture, they found that the historical view of the Old Testament was untenable in time, so they kept forging the chronology of ancient Egypt to push the history of ancient Egypt further in the past ... Said pointed out: "No matter from the perspective of art, science and the sense of supersaturation of * * *, the role of Egypt has been constantly becoming various" actions "with world historical significance on the stage.

A new world hegemony, which originated in modern Europe, can naturally show its strength to the world by capturing Egypt, legitimize their aggression and write down colonial history.

Once Egypt is captured, the fate of this African country will be combined with the whole of Europe.

In addition, once in Egypt, the earliest ancestors in Europe were only Homer, Alexander the Great, Caesar, Plato and Pythagoras, but now they can be traced back to the older sages in the East.

In short, the value of the existence of the East lies not in its connection with the real world of modern Europe, but in its connection with the distant past of Europe.

This is what I mentioned, a pure example: the "textual" and "schematic" attitude of the west towards the eastern world.

In addition to ancient Egypt, the history of the two river basins is often forged, mainly through the interpretation of cuneiform characters (it is said that westerners "deciphered" the ancient Egyptian and two river basin characters, but actually "bet"). "All ethnic groups around the Mediterranean and as far away as the Persian Gulf are really full of vitality and are the most active ethnic groups.

In the Roman Empire, this existence was truly unified.

Only here can all the premises of the spirit be realized; Only here can there be development, no absolute decline, only change.

After the new integration with the Germanic nation, after 1500 or 2000, this active group stands out again, it has digested America, and now it is about to completely open up Asia.

How long will it take for all negative existence to be conquered and saturated by it? Non-Caucasians resist, yield and perish.

The Egyptians, Babylonians and Phoenicians had laid the foundation for this power to conquer the world at that time.

Not only through jumping and the stimulation of opposites, but also through slow development, we are spiritually connected with them.

It is lucky to be subordinate to this active crowd.

"The representative year of ancient Egypt is forged, without any scientific testing and archaeological research. The fictional representative of the year of ancient Egypt even directly mentioned the history of ancient Egypt 7000 years ago.

In order to protect the interests of Eurocentrism, western imperialist scholars invented the history of Orientalism, which is called Orientalism.

First look at the chronology of the ancient Egyptian dynasty. Those who study the history of ancient Egypt first accepted a chronology of the ancient Egyptian dynasty from about 5300 BC to about 332 BC.

Pre-dynasty period, about 5300- 2950 BC, early dynasty period, about 2950- 26 13 BC, ancient kingdom period of the first and third dynasties, about 26 13- 2 160 BC, the first middle period of the fourth and eighth dynasties, about 2 BC. About 2055 BC-65438 BC+0640 BC, the second middle period of the 12th dynasty-14th dynasty, about 65438 BC+0640 BC-15th dynasty-17th dynasty, New Kingdom period, about 65438 BC+0550 BC-65438 BC+0069 BC-18th dynasty-20th. About 65438 BC+0550 BC-65438 BC+0069 BC, the 2nd1dynasty-Egypt at the end of the 25th dynasty, about 765438 BC+05 BC-25th dynasty (the end of 332 BC) to the 3rd1dynasty, a chronology.

We should not only ask, where did this "ancient chronology" come from? It turns out that there was no chronology in ancient Egypt. This so-called "chronology of ancient Egypt" was compiled by modern western scholars themselves.

In this regard, western scholars do not say anything.

"Before delving into the history of ancient Egypt, we must first talk about the structure of Egyptian chronology, which was mainly designed by modern scholars in the past two centuries.

"Before18th century, there was no concept of' ancient Egyptian civilization'." The natural order of all things in the world seems to show incontrovertibly that Egypt was one of the last lands to be settled in ancient times.

"([France] Voltaire's Theory of Customs on page 92, the Commercial Press 1994 1 1 October edition) in the west," Until the19th century, people still thought that the oldest history was ancient Hebrew history.

As for the history of ancient Egypt, Babylon, Assyria, Phoenicia and Persia, apart from the occasional accounts in the Old Testament, Greek writers have also preserved some knowledge in this field, but these historical materials are still scarce together.

"([America ]J? W? Thompson's History of Historical Works (Volume I, Volume 1, Page 3-4, Commercial Press, May 1988) is based on the fact that most of the so-called "knowledge preserved by Greek writers" are documents forged by western scholars later.

"Egyptology" used to be just some "literati" (poets and writers used to participate in archaeology in the West, laughing without saying a word, and Minos' famous archaeological fraud was built by these literati. - .

It is said that Napoleon planned the conquest of Egypt in advance and selected "academic" departments in the army, including chemists, historians, biologists, archaeologists, surgeons and antique experts.

From the beginning of the occupation of Egypt, Napoleon ordered his "organization" to hold meetings, conduct experiments and collect all kinds of "facts" about Egypt. As a result, 23 volumes of Egyptian descriptions were published from 1809 to 1828. He asked the researchers to record what they saw and heard in Egypt.

"([America] Edward? Said's Orientalism Chinese Edition 1 19 Page Revision, Lixu Culture Enterprise Co., Ltd. 65438+February 2000). This is the origin of modern Egyptology.

Originally, "Egyptology" originated from the hands of royal scholars of French colonialists, or more precisely, royal scholars with ranks of French occupation forces. During their short occupation of Egypt, they constructed the so-called "Egyptology" in a favorable form.

Is this "Egyptology" credible?

The book Description of Egypt has thus wrongly reshaped the history of Egypt and the East.

The history recorded in Description of Egypt replaced the original history of Egypt and the East, and was immediately recognized by Europeans as a part of world history. In fact, the so-called world history is a euphemism for European history.

"The ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs seen today originated from the design and production of1westerners in the first half of the 9th century.

Heinrich? Julius. Klaproth (1783-1835) customized the first batch of such movable type for a publication in 1829.

In Germany, the first system of pictographic movable type was invented by Friedrich in 1835 in Leipzig. Niels designed it as an irregular projection by Gustav? Serfass and Morizet? G. Zategwa used it first.

Later, other countries produced various similar movable types, including samples made by the National Printing Bureau in Paris.

"([English] John? The Book of the Dead in Ancient Egypt (collected by British Museum), edited by Taylor, 296 pages, published by Times Media Co., Ltd., Beijing Times Chinese Publishing House, 20 14, 1 version) The "hieroglyphics of ancient Egypt" we see today were originally designed by westerners in the19th century. ...