Social observation: Why are the rich in China "vulnerable groups"

The weakness of the rich in China lies in the emergence of a stronger elite. For ordinary people, the actions of some rich people and the rich second generation are absolutely no less than those of landlords who bullied the weak and feared the hard. Only in the face of a stronger government and elite, it is not good for the rich in China not to admit their weakness. All the advantages and disadvantages are produced by comparison, so what are the vulnerable groups of the rich in China? Just like your headlines, you can only quote them.

The rise of strong government and strong culture is the fundamental reason for the decline of entrepreneurial spirit, and overseas immigration, fleeing industry and even civil servant fever are all symptoms. This phenomenon reflects a problem: although the entrepreneurial groups in China are shiny on the surface, they still have "dissatisfaction" in their hearts. If they just want to make money and nothing else, they are easy to get along with in China. China, which is developing rapidly now, is a good time to fish in troubled waters and make a lot of money. At present, there is a larger group in China with wealth and power, but they just enjoy it and remain silent-they are the biggest beneficiaries of the current system and the most satisfied group.

But if entrepreneurs still want to express or realize some ideal things, such as fairness and justice, democratization, deep-seated system reform, political participation, monopoly reform of state-owned enterprises and so on. They will immediately encounter various obstacles.

Observing the activities of entrepreneurs in China, we can find that state-owned enterprise executives and private entrepreneurs are two completely different tribes. Except for a few people, such as Ning, state-owned enterprise executives can't get into private entrepreneurs in China.

In many mass entrepreneurial activities like this, it is rare to see the executives of central enterprises. State-owned enterprise executives are closer to government officials. They are completely groups within the system, using the resources of the system and eating the food of the system. They are different from each other, and of course they are not on the same road as private entrepreneurs.

If the group of state-owned enterprise executives is excluded, and only private entrepreneurs remain in China, they will be even more lonely.

In fact, entrepreneurs who are outstanding in market and wealth still lack expressive power in politics and influence in system reform. Although many businessmen in China try their best to squeeze into the CPPCC and the National People's Congress and get close to government officials, they hope to become red-topped businessmen like Hu Xueyan. Many entrepreneurs do business like a game, hoping to tie the government, the market and themselves together. However, in China's social life and political structure, they are still a group lacking substantial influence and even unable to form enough climate.

Finally, the conclusion is that the pattern of strong government and strong interest groups has solidified in China, and it is constantly strengthening. Without major reforms, it is impossible to change all this! In this regard, although these private entrepreneurs in China have stepped onto the red carpet, gained the spotlight, been sought after by the media and admired by the society, they still belong to the "weak" group in the political and economic arena of China. When they encounter a strong government and strong interest groups, they will immediately show their "weakness."