What will happen if India is not independent but still ruled by Britain?

First of all, it should be pointed out that India is actually a taxpayer concept artificially created by Britain in the past for the convenience of tax collection. It is not a unified country. During the period of British jurisdiction, Britain granted many privileges to Tuzhou. Now in India, strictly speaking, it is still the same pattern, and many local States have great privileges. It is Madhya Pradesh that really follows the baton. Imagine what would happen if Britain did not withdraw its troops after World War II and stayed in India? Assuming that Britain does not retreat, India's position is to give blood to Britain and become the last selling point and savior of British industry. For example, Britain has further curbed the development of heavy industry in India. Before World War II, it has been suppressing national industries such as Tata. Even the textile industry is rarely privately owned. India is positioned as a pure agricultural country and a dumping ground for industrial products. In order to divide and rule, Britain is bound to further expand the power of landlords. India is more divided. It is estimated that today is no different from black Africa.

The background of India's independence is that the world has entered the era of decolonization. Therefore, if India is not independent, there is only one possibility, that is, India becomes a part of Britain, and all Indians gain full British national identity.

This will have disastrous consequences for Britain. Because a large number of Indians, as long as they can afford the tolls, will basically seek to live in the British Isles. Britain will be the first country to be hit by refugees, and the size of this refugee is likely to be tens of millions. Considering that the EU with a population of 500 million has been overwhelmed by less than10 million refugees, what will happen if Britain with a population of 50 million faces tens of millions of Indian immigrants?

First of all, toilets and sewers are definitely not enough. Cross-flow of sewage and river pollution are inevitable. Of course, you can say that Indians like to urinate everywhere, and it doesn't matter if there is no toilet. But this is even more painful for British environmentalists. Some flowers and trees may be more lush. After all, they are nourished by natural fertilizers, but they may also be burned to death because of "excessive fertilization". Therefore, it is hard to say whether Britain was "smelly+lush" or "smelly+dead plants". At this time, environmental organizations will be furious. The Green Party may become the largest political party in Britain, which has a far-reaching influence on the political development of Britain. Not to mention the third way in Britain. "Clean Britain" may be the loudest slogan when running for prime minister. However, in any case, Britain will not face the problem of Britain's withdrawal from the EU. Because Britain, which owns India, is not qualified to join the European Union at all (environmental protection and health standards are not up to standard), it also saves the trouble of leaving the European Union. In this way, India will not be independent, which is good for Britain to withdraw from the EU. Secondly, Britain will certainly not establish such a perfect welfare system as it is today. Because a large number of Indian immigrants will make the welfare system make ends meet, a low-level welfare system is more suitable, which will make Britain an anomaly in Europe. At the same time, Britain's industrial upgrading will be slower. When Europe vigorously develops new manufacturing industries due to rising labor costs, Britain can say that there is no pressure. Because the Indian subcontinent's rich labor force can be supplied indefinitely. So Britain is likely to become a European factory. It is difficult for Britain to become the factory of the world, because China has a population of 654.38+300 million. In order to become a world factory comparable to China, Britain needs to transfer all the Indian population there.

But this brings problems. If hundreds of millions of Indians move to Britain and the sewage facilities can't keep up, the whole Atlantic may be polluted by British defecation. At that time, Britain and Canada will jointly protest against Britain, and it is hard to say whether NATO can be saved. Even if it can be preserved, the pure and affectionate special relationship between Britain and the United States may no longer be maintained, which will lead to a huge rift in the Atlantic alliance. Taking this opportunity, Putin may have started in Eastern Europe more than ten years in advance.

Therefore, if India is not independent, maybe the whole world pattern will change dramatically.

Let's suppose.

At present, Britain still rules India. First of all, Indian nationalists will continue to make trouble for the British. Please refer to the fact that Northern Ireland has been ruled by Britain for so long and has not yet completed its integration. The British are no worse than our ancestors, and most of Britain's energy will be devoted to suppressing the rebellion.

In order to maintain this huge territory of India, Britain needs to constantly mobilize domestic youth to join the army in India. Of course, the basis of the army will still be Indians, and the population of Britain is not enough to rule such a large territory. The British will be forced to implement one country, two systems in India, as they did in the past 100 years. The implementation of federalism will have great autonomy and save a lot of ruling costs, but it will also weaken the control of British rulers over other regions, especially the border areas, and the harm of local separatism will be more serious than now.

After all, England is not their real home. They may not care much about improving India's industrial manufacturing capacity, but they will also regard India as a dumping ground for their products. However, because maintaining this site has exhausted the British army and has no other desire to expand, they will not expand their troops like this except maintaining the necessary military strength to deal with domestic rebels. A small part of the military spending saved may be used to improve people's livelihood and buy the hearts of Indians.

So to sum up, if India is still under British rule, its national strength may not be as good as it is now, but the life of the people at the bottom should be better than it is now.