How do American talents prepare letters of recommendation when applying for immigration?

The applicant or beneficiary must provide a letter of recommendation issued by experts, professors, associate professors, assistant professors and researchers in the field of the applicant or beneficiary. These letters must show the outstanding performance of the foreigner in his field. Preparing and drafting these letters is a very difficult process, so hire a service agency that can provide samples and modify letters of recommendation. We have decades of working experience in this industry and will be of great help to your application. Most referees will ask the applicant or the beneficiary of the application to draft the draft themselves, and they will read it before signing it. Therefore, the applicant or the beneficiary of the application must ask us to review before asking the referee to sign and confirm that the content is correct. A good recommendation letter can vividly reflect the outstanding achievements of the applicant or the beneficiary of the application that cannot be expressed by other evidence, and turn a weak application into a strong and favorable application. On the contrary, an application that is strong in other aspects, but does not focus on the recommendation letter, is not sure of success under the general mentality that immigration officials are "not responsible for refusing, but (possibly) responsible for approving". In recent years, the requirements of recommendation letters in major immigration centers have changed. Previous samples may not be applicable now. Most letters of recommendation have some common problems, which will affect the application quality if they are not corrected. In addition to explaining the past achievements of the applicant or the beneficiary of the application, the recommendation letter should also emphasize "contribution" and "influence". A letter of recommendation always needs to state the past achievements of the applicant or beneficiary in his field. Many letters of recommendation only list how many articles, books and awards the applicant or beneficiary has published, so that it gives the impression to the immigration officer that the recommender is just repeating the resume of the applicant or beneficiary. Such a letter, immigration officials will think it is too general, general, not special and specific enough, and lacks connotation and substantive information. What the immigration officer wants to see is: where is the importance of the publication of the applicant's or beneficiary's article, where is the "contribution" to his field, and where is the "impact" on his field. "Contribution to this field" does not necessarily mean "influence on this field". At present, the Immigration Bureau pays more attention to the "influence" of the applicant or the beneficiary in its field than the possible "contribution" when hearing the application for outstanding talents. Because there are too many applicants or beneficiaries who have contributed. Everyone can make some "contributions", the paper itself can be said to be "contributions", and the speech at the meeting can also be "contributions". But this article, or this speech, really has little "impact" on the whole field. The recent emphasis on "influence" by the Immigration Bureau has greatly increased the difficulty of applying for immigrants with outstanding talents. In this case, a strong recommendation letter is even more important. The opinions of experts in the same field can help immigration officers better understand the "influence" of applicants or beneficiaries in their fields. One of the criteria for immigration officers: the past contribution and influence of the applicant or beneficiary to the applicant or beneficiary's field is an important indicator to judge whether the applicant or beneficiary is likely to make a contribution to the United States in the future. The recommendation letter should highlight the personal role and contribution of the applicant or beneficiary in the team. Many NIW applicants or beneficiaries are members of "research groups" or laboratories. The common problem of some letters of recommendation is that they describe too much the importance of the research topic that the applicant or beneficiary participated in, but they do not describe the role that the applicant or beneficiary played in this research topic. You can't ask for recognition of the outstanding talents and scholars of the applicant or beneficiary just based on the importance of the project in which the applicant or beneficiary participates. Our experience tells us that the applicant or beneficiary should prove that her ability is higher than that of other researchers engaged in similar research. Only describing the importance of projects and topics without emphasizing the importance of personal roles will weaken the weight of applicants or beneficiaries in the eyes of immigration officials. How to highlight yourself? Let's talk about the following questions first: Is the applicant or the beneficiary of the application the person in charge of the research project or the person in charge? Is the applicant or the beneficiary of the application the first author of the paper of the project team? Does the applicant or beneficiary have some special knowledge or skills that others do not have? Does the applicant or beneficiary or his special knowledge or skills play a vital role in the success or failure of the project? As long as the applicant or beneficiary meets any of the above conditions, he can explain his important role in the scientific research team. A letter of recommendation should vividly describe how the applicant or beneficiary will contribute to the national interests of the United States with his unique skills in the future. When many letters of recommendation talk about how the applicant or beneficiary will contribute to the national interests, there is also a common problem, that is, the descriptions are too "abstract" and there are too many professional words, so that immigration officials cannot understand the benefits. Scientists are generally more rigorous and conservative. However, because the readers are immigration officials, abstract and over-technical things will alienate these ordinary and busy immigration officials and lead to boredom. In terms of possible contribution to national interests, the best recommendation letter is to take advanced scientific theory and possible problems in real life as examples to prove his benefits. For example, if the applicant or beneficiary has helped the United States in medicine, the contribution of the applicant or beneficiary can be brought into life through the experience and feelings of a patient in the future clinic.