Job seekers are most afraid of being too high or too low.

Job seekers are most afraid of being too high or too low.

Job seekers are most afraid of being too high or too low. A positive and responsible work attitude is a potential promotion trend. Many things in the workplace are worth learning. The workplace will not believe in tears. Let me show you what job seekers are most afraid of: being too high or too low.

What job seekers fear most is whether they are tall or low, or 1 camera.

On July 6th, Chen Jialing, a fresh graduate of China University of Mining and Technology, boarded the train to Baotou, ready to report to a local joint venture coal mine. This is not the only job opportunity in Xiao Chen. Three months ago, he received an "admission notice" from a research institution in Beijing. But after repeated comparisons, Xiao Chen finally gave up Beijing and chose Baotou.

"Baotou was chosen because of its high salary and great development potential." Chen Jialing told reporters. The salaries of scientific research institutions in Beijing are low. Although I have paid "three insurances and one gold" such as social endowment insurance and medical insurance, I can't prepare and solve the Beijing hukou. The salary of Baotou Company during the probation period can reach 5,000 yuan, and it is up to you to decide whether to settle down or not. "The most important thing is that the post conforms to my major. As an applied student, I can apply what I have learned and make myself feel more self-worth. "

The reporter asked: "Is it easy for college students to find jobs?" Chen Jialing said: "It depends not only on everyone's ability, but also on everyone's attitude." He told reporters that most of his classmates found jobs like him: "If you choose comfort, work in Xuzhou or go back to your hometown;" Those who are not afraid of hardship will go to work in various mining areas. Although the working conditions are hard, it will certainly develop rapidly. The biggest fear of finding a job is that it can't be too high or too low. You can't suffer, and you don't want to be unknown in ordinary posts. Some students still have no jobs, mainly for this reason. "

interpret

Should young people choose first-tier cities or second-and third-tier cities? Ren Yuan suggested that whether young people "escape from the northern part of Guangzhou" or stick to "going to the northern part of Guangzhou" should be based on the rational choice of urban environment and their own development.

He said that Chen Jialing's choice reflects the rationality and diversity of contemporary youth's concept of career choice. In the past, the concept of "crowding a wooden bridge with thousands of troops" and rushing to first-tier cities began to loosen, and development opportunities, income levels and social welfare became comprehensive factors for young people to consider when choosing a job. A rational and diversified view of job selection is helpful for young people to realize themselves. Ma Yun, an entrepreneurial star, did not insist on developing in the first-tier city of Shanghai because of his rational judgment on his own development, but chose the second-tier city of Hangzhou.

Ren Yuan believes that in the process of informationization and globalization, the competition between cities is becoming increasingly fierce, which is conducive to creating a fairer development environment for the growth of teenagers in different regions. The decision to stay or stay is a choice made by young people after rational thinking and should be respected. What cities have to do is to respect their decisions. For immigrants, cities should not set exclusive rules, and for those who have the will to move out, they should not set obstacles to move out. Whether it is "fleeing from the north to the north", "rushing to the north" or "sticking to the north", it will help promote the flow of talents between cities and contribute to the rational distribution of talents.

What job seekers fear most is whether they are tall or not. Recently, the Shanghai Youth Daily news hotline received complaints from the public that it was cheated by some people in the Shanghai labor market under the guise of recruitment.

Why are there all kinds of "traps" in the Shanghai labor market? Why do job seekers fall into the trap? Analysis shows that the main reasons are as follows:

The market economy system requires that the labor force as a resource must be allocated through the market mechanism. However, the current labor market mechanism is not perfect, and some unlicensed labor intermediaries are mixed in the market, giving criminals an opportunity. Insufficient supervision of the market. If some unlicensed labor agencies are banned from illegal business by the administrative department for industry and commerce, they will move to another place and everything will remain the same.

The qualification examination of service advertisements is a mere formality, and it is difficult to distinguish between true and false recruitment information. If someone is operating illegally in Zhabei District, but his false employment advertisement is approved by the talent exchange center in the neighboring area before it is published in the newspaper. According to it, the release of labor advertisements is completed by the "one-stop" service of advertising agents, as long as the advertising fee is paid enough.

Some laid-off job seekers are mostly "4050" personnel. On the one hand, they are middle-aged, have a heavy economic burden, are eager to find a job to earn money, and are easy to become victims of infringement fraud; On the other hand, their cultural quality is generally low and it is difficult to find a job, so they are more eager to succeed. Their legal awareness and market awareness are weak. In the process of job hunting, they often don't pay attention to the qualifications of labor agencies and employers. When their legitimate rights and interests are violated, they often do not pay attention to taking up legal weapons to defend their rights and interests, but instead think that they are unlucky and have poor self-protection ability.