The relationship between Han nation-state and China.

I have read many experts' theories, all of which emphasize national unity on the basis of national equality. At first glance, it seems that they are fighting for their national rights and interests. In fact, if you think deeply, you will reflect a deep national inferiority complex. Because there are two things they can't explain: first, the normal state of a nation is competition, struggle and compromise. Because there are natural conflicts of interest between nations, they have been formed since primitive society. The so-called national reunification has no theoretical basis and is pseudoscience. Second, if we say that ethnic groups are equal, most social resources will naturally be allocated because of the quality and population of the main ethnic groups. So is it fair to other ethnic groups? On the other hand, is it fair to the subject if it does not meet the resources they have contributed? Then, because of the factors of humanity and descent, a healthy nation will inevitably give things to its own people. Then it violates the reverse distribution of human nature and bloodline, and the consequences are unimaginable.

In ethnic theory, Marxism-Leninism obliterates the law of normal ethnic competition with class theory, and it is bound to go against distribution. The result is that the vast majority of people are actually equal. So what is the basis of national equality? We don't recognize the scarcity of resources, the competitiveness of nations, the internalization of human nature and the convergence of lineages. The class theory in social economy confuses the real relationship between nationalities, which eventually leads to the greatest national inequality. Absolute equality often leads to the greatest inequality. Therefore, all ethnic wars caused by ethnic tensions and ethnic divisions basically occur in socialist countries, which is not without profound essential reasons. The fundamental reason is that the class theory in social economy confuses the competitiveness in ethnic relations.

From this, it can be concluded that occupying most social resources is the natural right of the subject nation. This is also the natural domineering of the main nation.

The main nation is not the result of theoretical creation, but the result of historical choice. If a nation wants to be a ruling nation, it must be in a strong position for a long time in history, thus producing the most powerful military, economic and cultural forces. To sum up, it is the power of civilization. Other ethnic groups in a country must obey the rule of the dominant ethnic group, obey the civilized power of the dominant ethnic group, take the dominant ethnic group as the core and represent it to the outside world-France is French France, Germany is German Germany, and China is also the China of the Han people-which is the natural representative force of the dominant ethnic group to the outside world. Only on this basis can other nationalities enjoy the basic rights of citizens and undertake corresponding obligations. Otherwise, whoever dares to openly challenge the civilized forces of his subjects and nations will be anti-civilization and barbarians. Brutal warfare does not deserve to enjoy the basic rights of citizens. Because infringing on the civilized power of the main ethnic group will lead to civil war in the country, and the final victims will not only be the main ethnic group, but also the innocent people of other ethnic groups.

From this, we draw another conclusion: it is inevitable for the main nation to maintain its own civilization. From this conclusion, we also draw another conclusion. In a truly healthy and harmonious country, only the main ethnic group is qualified to emphasize the ethnic group, and no other ethnic group is qualified to emphasize any ethnic group, only their concept of citizenship. The former is emphasized by the state, while the latter is emphasized by law. This is the sword of the country. Historical experience has repeatedly proved that whoever moves will die.

Why is there an argument of national unity? Because China people are deeply influenced by Marxism-Leninism. Because Marxism–Leninism has designed a perfect national blueprint for us, national reunification will eventually move towards democratic integration. But the word ethnic integration, I believe most people simply don't understand the basic meaning of this word.

The so-called ethnic integration means that two equal ethnic groups merge on the basis of long-term growth of the same sex, and ethnic differences can eventually disappear and merge into a new ethnic group. Migrate to live together, marry each other, and all ethnic groups learn from each other and develop together. It also refers to the ways and means of national extinction all over the world. It refers to the historical process that national characteristics and differences gradually disappear and become a complete human being without national boundaries after the establishment of capitalist society all over the world.

Please take a closer look at the three key words here: reciprocity, mutual benefit and world harmony.

Equivalence means that the strength of the two nations is not much different, and they are basically in a state of power contrast. According to this statement, the main nation does not exist in all countries in the world. Don't forget that absolute civilization is the necessary prerequisite for becoming a dominant nation, and absolute violence is the backing of civilization. What is the premise of national integration?

Mutual refers to the mutual influence and exchange of national characteristics and cultures of both sides, which eventually evolved into new national characteristics and new national civilization. Then I ask here, the main nation has absolute strength, why should you let your backward civilization change for my advanced civilization? If there is ethnic integration, Tibetans will eat bloodless pork. Will Han people eat it? Mongols tend horses and sheep, but Han people are willing to lead horses to lofting. How to influence and communicate with each other?

World harmony means that all ethnic groups disappear and the world is unified. But at the same time, Marxists say in their philosophy that contradiction is absolute and the basis of contradiction is difference. For example, no two leaves are exactly the same. Then I want to ask, since differences exist, where do you infer that national differences will eventually disappear completely and move towards world harmony? To say the least, even if you are telling the truth, is the fact after tens of thousands of years a reality in today's world? If the theory is too advanced to guide social development, it will inevitably cause comprehensive harm to society.

Therefore, the so-called national integration does not exist, and China's view of history based on it is also wrong. Opening the history books, there is basically no so-called national integration, only the so-called national melting. What is national integration? The so-called ethnic integration means that a nation has formed an absolute civilized force in a country due to historical choices, and gradually changed the characteristics of other ethnic groups, resulting in the gradual disappearance of other ethnic groups and the integration of the population into the main ethnic group. So when we look at history, we see military conquest and cultural conquest, not peaceful coexistence under the influence of peace.

There are two ways to melt the nation, one is the result of favoring the power of civilization, and the other is for the sake of soft power. ; One is the result of biased violence, and it is for hard power.

The power of civilization usually occurs between two ethnic groups with the same or similar modes of production, and usually takes the power of culture as the initiative. For example, the Greek city-state, which was dominated by maritime trade, finally formed the Greek nation under the philosophy of Athens and the military culture of Sparta and Macedonia. Its core and main nationalities are Athens, Sparta and Macedonia. But this is not a typical ethnic integration, because the main ethnic groups are diversified. The national melting of truly typical civilized forces is the cultural conquest of the southern minorities in China by the Central Plains Dynasty for a long time. Its national characteristics gradually disappeared, and the national convergence gradually moved closer to the Han nationality. The biggest difference between the latter and the former is the difference in strength. The former is similar to China's Spring and Autumn Period, but the real national integration often exists only in the imperial era. Under the influence of the long-term Han civilization, the southern minorities gradually lost their national characteristics, which are basically the same as those of the Han nationality. This is the result of the power of civilization.

The other is the hard power biased towards violence, which is often used by powerful, extremely different ethnic characteristics and extremely barbaric ethnic groups. This violence is not pure violence, but violence with strong political wisdom. Not just military violence. Its purpose is to immigrate, master the land and women, and divide each other's upper and lower levels. Of course, this requires the military as the premise and the power of civilization as the result. In other words, it is the forced assimilation of civilization based on military violence.

1. Immigration: Immigration is the most direct means to change the contrast of national strength. At that time, Zhang transported a large number of people from the inside to the outside of the customs, which greatly improved the population base comparison between Han nationality and Russians, and between Japanese and local ethnic minorities, thus preventing Japan and Russia from encroaching on the Northeast. Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty enriched the Hetao area with a large number of Han people, and Inner Mongolia eventually became the territory of Han people. Without immigrants, territory is not a real territory. The reason why the Han and Tang Dynasties finally lost the Western Regions was that there were basically no immigrants. Therefore, at present, immigration is the best choice for border separatist forces. Moreover, these immigrants must be strongly protected by the state and enjoy economic benefits that the mainland cannot enjoy.

Second, master the land and women: the westward movement in the United States is essentially a land grab movement. Plunder a lot of land from Indians, which is the fundamental reason why there are fewer and fewer Indians in the western United States. Because land is the foundation of wealth, people have lived on it since primitive society. Without land, a nation loses its roots. The fundamental point of violence is often reflected in the plunder of land. At this point, the Han, Tang and Ming dynasties did a bad job and gave the conference semifinals a lot of land. This is the root of Hu people's growth. Because land is the foundation of wealth, if Han immigrants get a lot of land in the west, they will inevitably become the local rich class. Man struggles upwards, but water flows downwards. Generally speaking, women like the strong. This is the basic animality that has existed since the beginning of animals. Wealth is the foundation of the strong, so it will inevitably lead to a large number of frontier women marrying Han Chinese. And because the Han nationality is judged by paternal descent, the result is that there are more and more descendants of the Han nationality, and their quality is getting higher and higher (because a few women who marry the Han nationality are basically high-quality women of that nationality); There are fewer and fewer descendants, and their quality is getting lower and lower.

Third, divide the upper and lower classes of the other ethnic group: use preferential policies to attract the elites of ethnic minorities to develop in the mainland, and use the vast territory of the mainland to dilute their own people so that they are not connected with each other. At the same time, for those special talents who are familiar with local conditions and have familiar management experience, they become the comprador of the Han people and manage the middle and lower classes. The wisdom of politics lies in balance and differentiation. To "unite", we must "unite" their upper levels. Make the middle and lower classes gradually become migrant workers, or urban workers, or agricultural workers.

Fourthly, the first three points are special, that is, they are aimed at the northwest Muslims. Freedom of religious belief is true, but religious belief must conform to national laws. This is justified in any country. Based on the characteristics of Islamic extremism and fanaticism, Muslims in China must be urged to carry out religious reform to conform to the rules of modern civilization. Get rid of the inhuman and uncivilized Islamic teachings. The focus is Muslim interventionism and closed intermarriage. Emphasize tolerance and freedom of marriage. Freedom of religious belief can only be achieved within the scope prescribed by law, otherwise it is contempt for national laws.

We can review the historical lessons of Han nationality, the main ethnic group in China, and find out why a series of historical tragedies and national tragedies such as Wuhu, Mengyuan and Manchu appeared. I just don't understand the profound truth of national melting.

First, in the classical primitive culture, the foreign guiding ideology of Huairou Yi people was misled: if people stay away, they cultivate themselves. This sentence was originally said to the civilized people in Xia Dynasty, and later people used it in their diplomatic strategy towards barbarians. This is a fatal mistake, because barbarians know civilization and how to cultivate morality. It can be said that many men in the Han family were deeply poisoned by this thought, thus laying a great hidden danger in the process of conquest. As a result, it leads to "forbearance outside and taboo inside", but when foreigners are involved, they will be lenient with their own people. This erroneous concept has also profoundly influenced the diplomatic strategy of the current China administration. Ming Chengzu's generosity to Bo is the best embodiment of China's so-called great power generosity. Only at the expense of the people. Satisfying the vanity of a few rulers by hurting the national interests of the subject will eventually be punished by history.

Second, give less people military and political power. Why did the Tang Dynasty give less people military and political power after the Anshi Rebellion, which led to the weakening of the absolute strength of the main nation? This triggered the butterfly effect, and the Tang Dynasty never recovered. It paved the way for the rise and prosperity of northern barbarians, which led to the congenital deficiency and fatigue in the Northern Song Dynasty. This is the historical remote cause of Meng Yuan's destruction of China.

Third, give the besieged conference semifinals land. This is a common problem in Han, Tang and Ming dynasties. The Han dynasty gave the southern Xiongnu land and protected the Xiongnu governor. It was precisely the descendants of the southern Xiongnu who rebelled for the first time in Wuhu; In the Tang Dynasty, many Hu people were appointed as local envoys, which actually gave them the right to manage and possess the land. However, during the reign of Emperor Chengzu in the Ming Dynasty, it was even more excessive. A large number of Tungusic people, especially Jianzhou Nuzhen, donated the land in Northeast China, which was the reason for the rise of Manchuria. Land is the foundation of wealth, and it is also the foundation of the country and the nation. Not an inch of land, not an inch of land, this is right. Giving land is to raise self-esteem.

Racial ablation is by no means Nazi genocide and genocide, but racial growth and disappearance based on racial competition.

First of all, the basis of national integration is the power of civilization, and it is the natural influence of civilization that leads to the disappearance of the nation. This is the law of history, not the result of violence. Although there are violent factors in this process, on the whole, it is essentially the root of civilization. For example, you can be an ox cart or a car. These are two different civilized choices, but time is money. If you choose to be an ox cart, you will be poorer than a car driver. People are naturally profit-seeking economically, so more and more people will choose to be cars. Savagery is like an ox cart, and civilization is like a car. No one is coming to oppress you. It all depends on your choice. Is this the spirit of freedom and democracy? Of course, you can also have the freedom to starve!

Secondly, the people's right to migrate is a natural right, and the land is owned by the whole people. At the same time, modern civilization emphasizes freedom of marriage in marriage. People can choose where to go, and every citizen has this freedom. Excellent people can get land completely, and excellent men can get excellent women completely. This perfectly embodies the humanistic spirit. Only shameless people will accuse others of their natural human rights. Then, as an excellent nation, why can't the Han nationality embody the humanistic spirit of nature? ! If few people are excellent, they can get it.

Finally, it is the natural right of the main nation to emphasize the nation and form a strong cohesion. This is by no means overbearing, but a historical choice and a realistic choice. China can be regarded as China without any ethnic groups, but if there were no Han people in China, China would perish. Do you think Germany does not emphasize the German nation, but emphasizes the Jewish nation, or the Turkish nation or other nations that have joined the German nation? Don't forget that even in immigrant countries, the American nation emphasized by the United States is represented by the Anglo-Saxon nation. Is it possible to emphasize Chinese in the United States as an ethnic minority from China? This is reasonable in any country in the world. Only in this way can fewer people live a better and better life and human life under the protection of a powerful subject nation. It is enough to emphasize civic awareness, give them the most basic rights and let them undertake the most basic obligations. The rest is basically nonsense. In terms of population, instead of emphasizing the rights and interests of 90% people, can we emphasize the rights and interests of 10% people? This is also a very shameful betrayal in the horse education theory.

The history of China is by no means a complete and pluralistic history of ethnic integration as advertised by the authorities. First of all, integration does not exist, even according to the concept of ethnic integration of Ma religion, it is a basic logical confusion. Secondly, integration and diversification often refer to federal countries, such as the Soviet Union. Is the tradition of China a Russian tradition or an alliance of independent countries? Northeast China is not a Manchu territory, Xinjiang is by no means a Uighur territory, and Tibet is not necessarily a Tibetan territory. In these places, even in the earlier historical period, there are traces of Han life. What's more, politically speaking, the national territory has never been the same. Do you ask the authorities to openly say that Outer Manchuria is China's inherent territory? Territory, to put it bluntly, can only be taken if it is capable. This is the cruelty of history. Also, don't forget that the Constitution of China stipulates that the territory of China is owned by the whole people. It is not the private property of one of your ethnic groups. It is precisely because it is owned by the whole people that the Han people certainly have legal autonomy in migration, sale and marriage.

Therefore, replacing the theory of national integration with the theory of national integration is the origin of restoring history and theory. It is also the key domineering of the Han nationality as the main nationality.

As a dominant nation, we should have the inherent domineering of the dominant nation, because this is the choice of history and reality. It is inevitable to allocate most of the resources to the society, to use the great power of civilization, and to use the theory of national integration to safeguard the unity and stability of the country. To say that the main ethnic group split the country, I think this painting should be completely torn up and thrown into the garbage dump of history. Don't forget how Yugoslavia cried.