Are the Indians descendants of the Yin people of China?

In recent years of research on the origins of Indians, some experts have suggested that the ancestors of Indians are Chinese. This statement has caused great controversy.

Most of today’s anthropologists and historians believe that the earliest inhabitants of the Americas migrated from other places. To sum up, there are four main points:

The first is the "European immigration theory." This theory holds that the ancestors of Indians entered the Americas from the European continent northward through Iceland and Greenland. Some people also believe that Europeans arrived in the Americas by crossing the Atlantic Ocean.

The second is the "South Pacific Island Theory". This theory holds that the deceased passed through the islands in the South Pacific and gradually moved into the Americas. Of course, some people believe that the Polynesians who originally lived on the Pacific Islands entered the Americas through the South Pacific Islands.

The third is the "African immigration theory." This theory holds that black Africans, especially Nubians and Malians, may have crossed the Atlantic to reach the Americas.

The fourth is the "Bering Strait theory." This theory believes that Asians of Mongoloid origin entered the American continent from Alaska through the frozen "corridor" of the Bering Strait between 40,000 and 18,000 years ago.

Some scholars believe that Indians are descendants of North Chinese people in my country.

The fourth method has great influence and has the most supporters. On the basis of this statement, Chinese scholars proposed the "North China theory" and used compelling evidence to prove that the ancestors of Indians were Chinese. The more famous scholar who holds this view is Wang Dayou. He published a series of books called "China Avenue Library", some of which discuss in detail the so-called "Chinese ancestors opened up the Americas" view. He believed that the ancestors of the Americas were the "Chinese race" and that American civilization was created by Chinese immigrants in different periods from 10,000 to 3,000 years ago. The evidence mainly comes from the following aspects. In 1975, a 3,000-year-old stone anchor was discovered in California, USA. After testing the rock samples, it was confirmed that this kind of rock only exists near the Taiwan Strait in my country, but not in the Americas. So the American scholar Moriarty sent relevant information and rock samples to Chinese archaeologist and paleoanthropologist Jia Lanpo, asking Chinese scholars to participate in the research. Mr. Jia then forwarded the information to Fang Zhongfu, an expert on the history of water transportation in my country. After research, Mr. Fang believed: "The Yin people sailed for three thousand years."

In 1953, American archaeologists discovered 16 statues and 6 jade guis in the ritual center of the Olmec ruins in Mexico. The jade guis were engraved with text, which Wang Dayou believed to be Yin and Shang characters. , and deciphered it, they were the names of the ancestors of the Yin people: Chiyou, Shaohao, Diku, Jiandi, Duofu, Qi, Xiangtu, Wanghai, Shangjia, etc. In addition, the customs of offering sacrifices are also the same as those of the Dongyi people.

Wang Dayou interpreted the Indian greeting "YINDIAN" (regarded as indian by Columbus) as "Yin Di'an", which means "Yin Di Anyang", and still said "home is good"; Interpretation of Indian legends

The "King HOSI" in the middle is You Houxi, the military commander of the late Yin Dynasty; the interpretation of "IN-FUBU" (Mexican Indian) is "Yin Fubu", and his place of residence "CHI-HUAHUA" is " Xihuahua" (Fuxi, Xihe's Xi, Huaxia of China); interpret "in-ca" (ancient Peruvian indigenous people) as "Yin family"; interpret "hopi" (American Arizona Indians) as "Huxu" "(ancient clan in my country); interpret "Na Dene" (aboriginal people on the west coast of Canada) as "Dadiwan" (Fuxi ruins in Qin'an County, Gansu) and so on. This view is highly controversial and not recognized in the mainstream. Scholars believe that this view actually reflects the different perspectives of "monism" and "pluralism".