Why does the policy of "robbing people" in major cities cause extensive discussion?

? Battle of robbery? What's behind it?

What are the reasons why first-and second-tier cities are eager for talents? Behind the "competition for war" is the competition for human capital dividends. ? Fu Yifu, a researcher at Suning Finance College, said? Rob someone? The reason is precisely? People? scarce

According to the logic of economic development, before the elderly population reaches a higher level, a country will form relatively rich labor resources, light support burden and very favorable economic development? Golden age? . Is this what population economists say? Demographic dividend? .

Fu Yifu believes that with the improvement of the skills, knowledge and experience of the working population, the population defects caused by the decline in the proportion of working-age population and the increase in dependency ratio will be effectively compensated. Thus formed the population and labor force. ? Quality for quality? This is a new period of rewarding opportunities. In this regard, population economists call it? Human capital dividend? This cannot be reflected from the simple statistics of the working population.

Fu Yifu said that it is not difficult to understand that there is a fierce war of robbing people in the city now. On the surface, cities are robbing people, but in essence, they are fighting for human capital dividends. The internal innovation and creativity of human capital is an important support, which brings more possibilities and supports the long-term sustainable development of regional economy.

Liang Jianzhang, president of the Society of Humanities and Economics and executive chairman of Ctrip.com, believes that the current? Grab the battle? It will lead to more talents gathering together, thus forming a good agglomeration effect in the field of innovation and entrepreneurship. ? We should be optimistic about this. ?

It can't be achieved by spending a lot of money? Keep people?

How to keep people after robbing them is also an important aspect. ? Judging from the current situation, many second-tier cities are actively grabbing talents. However, it is not that local governments spend a lot of money to retain talents after robbing them. At present, the pillars of these societies need to have enough room for development, not just places to live and live. ? Yang Yiyong, director of the Institute of Social Development of the National Development and Reform Commission, said.

Liu Wenjun, director of the Administrative Teaching Research Office of the Department of Public Administration of China Institute of Labor Relations, also said? The preferential policies currently adopted by some cities are mainly to lower the threshold for settlement and help solve the immigration problem. It's a little difficult. These measures aimed at the starting point are effective, but not enough. There is still a need. Formulate development-oriented follow-up measures, such as providing talent incentive system for employers, giving stable, reliable and attractive career expectations to talents, making full use of talents, and realizing a virtuous circle between talent introduction and cities. Develop by perfecting the system. ?

What Fu Yifu is thinking about is how to promote talents to integrate their own growth with urban development in addition to robbing people, so as to obtain a stage that can fully display their talents. For example, according to the professional characteristics and knowledge of talents, arrange timely and reasonable jobs to ensure that the advantages of talents are fully exerted and talents are fully utilized. At the same time, we should constantly optimize the soft environment of urban society. Strengthen the industrial base and so on.