The relationship between education and economy

In the relationship between education and society in Principles of Pedagogy, we know that economic development, that is, the level of productivity, has an impact on education: (1) The level of productivity restricts the specifications of personnel training; (2) The level of productivity restricts the speed and scale of education development; (3) Productivity restricts the reform of curriculum and educational content; (4) The development of productive forces promotes teaching organization, education and teaching forms. In fact, in our usual words, with money, the investment in education will rise, more talents will be cultivated, and the quality of education will be improved. As soon as the quality of education is improved, the curriculum will be more scientific and meet the needs of reality. At the same time, the competition will become greater and educational institutions will emerge as the times require. Therefore, both school teachers and institutional teachers should improve their teaching level to promote students' learning. Let's take a look at American education now. Since 1957, when the Soviet satellite was launched, Americans began to worry about their hegemony and began to reflect on what was wrong with their education. From the bill promulgated by their president, the name of the bill is crisis danger, which shows that the United States attaches importance to education. Moreover, the United States also has preferential treatment for the immigration system of former scholars. So it is not surprising that the United States has its present status so far. The popularization of compulsory education and the proposal of core literacy are also the results of economic development.

Let's take a look at Britain, a country with many nobles and gentlemen. In the sixteenth century, Britain was the overlord of the sea, and later it was called "the empire where the sun never sets". This is the United States now, but the United States now dares not ask for such a title. How rich is this? Look at the British ladies at that time, and you will know that they are ruthless, and they are ruthless. They put on skirts, high heels, small hats and party bags, and they are holding hands with handsome guys, and they have taken a step of disowning their six parents. It is rich in oil. Therefore, in order to cultivate children, people also invest money without blinking. These people supported British education when the country was still expanding its colonies and had no time to take care of education. Look at Eton College and Winchester College. At the first sight, I was really rich, and at the second sight, I was amazed at their antique and beautiful environment. I think this is one of the reasons why the dual-track system in Britain is so difficult to change. The training goal of children in poor families may be to support themselves, while children in noble families are people who train academic elites and manage the country. Moreover, the cost of raising a child is not low, so the poor are struggling for a living every day and have no money to invest in education. This also reflects Bourdieu's reproduction theory. Education system controls the production, transmission and transformation of cultural capital, and it is an important system to dominate social status and form social unconsciousness, that is, an important means to reproduce the unequal social structure. In other words, education will aggravate social stratification. My experience is that in high school, the teacher once said that if you want to know your salary, just average the salary of your close friends. Yes, the circle of friends is there. Where can you escape? In normal times, we will also find that good children like to play with good children, and it is easier to become friends at the same level. And now more and more people say that it is a truth that children from poor families can go out of golden phoenix. Education has intensified social division and class solidification. In this society where capital accumulation is insufficient and human greed is an insurmountable limitation, fairness can only be relative. Therefore, Cinderella's marriage to Prince Charming is just a fairy tale. Besides, Cinderella's family in fairy tales is also good, otherwise she is not qualified to go to the dance. This also explains why we should fight poverty now. How can there be a spiritual world without solving material problems?

? Then let's look at educators, such as scientists like Bacon, Milton, Diderot and Durkheim. Most educators have no mines at home, and most of them are graduates from universities such as Oxford and Cambridge. Even those who later put forward educational equity are rich, and even Marx and Engels can be said to be of noble birth. Therefore, the economy determines education, and the theory of human capital is not without reason and basis. It can be said that not only politics is a game for the rich, but education is also a means for them to strengthen their rule.

? On the other hand, education will have a negative impact on the economy. (1) Education transforms the possible labor force into the realistic labor force. (2) Modern education is an important way to produce science and technology and promote economic development. (3) Education is an important factor to improve the quality and productivity of workers. (4) Education can produce economic benefits and is a new growth point of economic development. That is to say, we go out to study, find a satisfactory job, earn a considerable income, and then live as we want, so that education will not fail, and then some of us with strong abilities will engage in research work related to science and technology, and their creativity will promote the development of science and technology and even social progress and change. We will get different social productivity because of different education levels and abilities, so we will get more or less wages, to a certain extent. This is our human capital theory. In other words, most people with high incomes don't have too low academic qualifications.

? Therefore, the economy determines education, and education reacts on the economy.