Seeking the film review of violent block 2

Banlieue 13 13: Ultimate: Violence remains, and it is amazing.

Last night, the west wind withered the trees: 2009-08- 14 08: 10.

A few years ago, Suburb 13 13 made a stunning appearance with novel action scenes and smooth editing, which made people hooked up. A few years later, the original team made a comeback, but the new work was much mediocre. Even the well-received previous episode was a cliche and nothing new, but fortunately, its excellent action scenes made up for this deficiency. Now that the sequel is on the market, the plot is still conventional, but unfortunately the action part seems to have regressed. Originally, I wanted to use Wei Yu from the last episode to rekindle my love fire, but obviously due to the lack of sincerity in re-creation, I don't think this fire is destined to burn.

It should be said that in the overall style, this film faithfully continues the last episode, and the rapid switching of short shots is quite unique. Just looking at the action part, it's still wonderful. However, in grasping the overall structure, the skill of the little-known director Patrick Alexsandro is obviously still very shallow, especially the cohesion of the action drama in the whole film is extremely sluggish, which makes the film lose the feeling of the previous episode as a whole, but the action drama seems to be an ornament, which makes people feel uncomfortable and extremely uncomfortable.

As far as the action scenes that this series of films have always been proud of are concerned, they are all for the sake of action. This problem existed in the first episode. However, in previous films, extreme sports were rarely introduced into films. In addition, the director pierre morel has a "very trafficker" shooting experience, and he seems to be able to relate the action scenes with the plot with ease, which makes the stunned audience "ignore" other shortcomings of the film and gives Morrel great encouragement. A few years later, his filming was a great success again, and he was surprised to "train" liam neeson who rarely flapped his wings. By contrast, Patrick Alexsandro, the director of the sequel, is not good enough. Although at the beginning of the film, the characteristics of the previous film are still continued, and the two protagonists respectively take the stage to "challenge", compared with the previous film, the scene of Cyril Rafelli's rampage against Chinese gangs is puzzling. Apart from reflecting Rafael's omnipotence, it has almost nothing to do with the whole play. It can only be said that it is for action, purely to please the audience. But in order to please the audience, the audience may not buy it. Personally, I think that the previous episode has let everyone know the strength of the two "characters", so there is no need to show off in the sequel, but more time should be reserved for the scenes that really need to break out.

Ok, even if this is in line with the "general rules" of action movies, let's compare the most anticipated "Running Cool Show" in two movies, both of which have david belle's personal "Running Cool Show" at the beginning. The previous episode lasted nearly 5 minutes, which attracted the audience's attention and conquered the audience. Moreover, in previous works, david belle's parkour lens always followed two or three seats, almost all of which were shot from elevation and depression angles, which was very visually impactful. On the other hand, the sequel is not only too short for parkour, but also a lot dull in lens application. Moreover, david belle often appears in the foreground, and even the close-up of the climax at the end of the film is too fast, which is not conducive to showing the extensiveness and consistency of his actions. This is an important reason why we can't enjoy watching sequels.

Look at Cyril Rafelli's action play again, and analyze it with the scene of China gangster making a scene. Comrade Raphael singled out five or six big men with Van Gogh's famous paintings, which is very similar to Jackie Chan's martial arts style. With the help of some props, he added a relaxed and humorous color to the warfare, not to say that it was not good, but without Raphael's personal style, it could be said that it was more relaxed than intense. Interested people can take a look at the previous film, which is also the casino where Lafley fights thugs. He is steady, accurate and ruthless, and the necessary slow motion makes the movements clear and stretch, which is very ornamental, especially the backhand hitting from upstairs to the table, which makes people unforgettable. The most impressive thing in the new work is not the physical performance of two people, but the domineering scene of driving rampage in the building.

In order to show the discriminated masses, this film introduces China people, blacks and Muslims from the same isolated area, and their action scenes are quite many, especially female leaders. A PK show is also set up for her alone, and it is also a "magic braid". Personally, I think this role looks cool, but her performance alone is a bit redundant and even affects the climax of the whole movie.

Since Bourne ultimatum, the fighting scenes in European and American action movies have become more and more delicate. On the basis of absorbing China's martial arts, it has its own distinctive features, that is, sharp, fierce and practical. In shooting techniques, it tends to switch quickly between short shots, showing the characteristics of close combat incisively and vividly, which is the most intuitive in Bourne ultimatum and Taken3. After the new millennium, action fighting movies in Europe and America seem to have formed two styles. One is Bourne ultimatum and Taken3. The fighting features are practical, fierce and neat. The other one, like banlieue 13 and Very Traffickers, is gorgeous, light and pleasing to the eye. We should also learn from the good resource integration ability of European and American film circles. For example, their remakes include The Ring of Midnight, Curse, Infernal Affairs and so on. And they are very spiritual in learning oriental fighting techniques. On the other hand, we can't do this. It is worth mentioning that luc besson, the master of the film industry, has made great contributions to action movies in recent years. The statement that Luc's production is a masterpiece is basically reliable. Whether it is a commercial film or an art film, Luc's master has basically made no mistakes.

However, the film's portrayal of Chinese gangs is worth pondering. In western society, China people are not all law-abiding, but all good citizens. It is self-deception to deny this. It is a natural phenomenon that people from various countries and races form gangs in immigrant areas, not only in China, but also in other countries. This is not a shameful thing, just to survive. If you have a decent job, who wants to be a gangster? The problem lies in the portrayal of China people, which is in the 2nd/kloc-0th century. It is very awkward to tie a braid on our heads. I don't believe that China people in foreign countries still have such braids. Even gangsters should have long hair or bright heads to be cool, and the underworld doesn't know aesthetics. Don't the underworld know that it's inconvenient to tie a braid like that? This is reflected in Jet Li's early Lethal Weapon, and Jet Li was also "braided". It's not that China people can't play villains, but I think it's realistic to play villains. Is it necessary for China people to go backwards in dress for a hundred years to play villains, otherwise it will not be enough to reflect the characteristics of China people? If this phenomenon is not discrimination against China people, it is also ignorance of China culture and the current situation in China. In the eyes of westerners, there is always something in China that stayed a hundred years ago and seems hard to change. Don't forget, China's underworld is also advancing with the times, enjoying the fruits of modern civilization, but not always dragging a small plait. Black sunglasses are not exclusive to westerners now. Please, teacher, we in China don't braid our hair now.

Sorry, I love my country randomly, but I can't love it. I think it's better to be patriotic at random than to betray the country seriously, right?

Ok, let's get back to the point. Objectively speaking, banlieue 13 13: The Ultimate is controlled by luc besson. Although it is not as exciting as the previous film, it is still an ornamental action film. The style has not changed, and it is still full of violence and parkour, but it is not as pleasing and amazing as the previous work. In addition to aesthetic fatigue, it is related to the director's ability to control.