Why does the United States directly "pour the pot" to refugees in the Middle East, while European countries have to "back the pot" to the United States?

Because it is difficult for refugees to sneak into the United States by personal means, the distance is too far and they can only go to Europe (the sea conditions in the Mediterranean are much better than those in the Atlantic, and the risk of smuggling across the Mediterranean is much smaller).

Think about it. If some people, men and women, old and young, including children and women, are waiting at the border of your country, they will starve to death because they are refused entry, or commit all kinds of bad crimes because they have nothing to do, many people will certainly be unbearable. At this time, they will not think about how much burden this group of people will bring to the country, and the next group of people will come in. They will only think that our country can't support many hundreds/thousands of people, and then tens of thousands of people will come in.

The big problem in Europe is that there is no strong government, and the government is easily influenced by public opinion or news propaganda. If, as the United States has done to Mexican refugees, they are repatriated unconditionally if caught, and they are killed if they resist, these "pots" will soon be gone. The United States responded to the propaganda of accepting refugees with an open mind and resolutely refused to change. We are very concerned about the refugee problem, but accept refugees? No chance. You can report it how you want, or the CIA will come to your house.