Originally, it was a * * * household, but later some of them moved to the city. Does the house have to be torn down in half?

This problem is still quite prominent. Rural areas are now relocated from different places and centralized resettlement. In short, there are all kinds of poverty alleviation immigrants. Many places require forced demolition, and some places have left a part. This problem is very complicated and specific. When you really go to the grassroots cadres and deal with them, the problems you encounter vary widely. At present, many local policies must be dismantled. However, some details are: what should be done with the original land after the relocation? If you don't tear it down, it will be uneven. In some places, others have opinions. Personally, I don't think it will be opened for the time being. The fire room that people say is now called the production room. When working, it is used as a temporary rest and living room. When the grain is collected, it will be used as a temporary warehouse to hold grain, or as a house for breeding. Of course, we don't tear down the house. Some people moved instead. For example, centralized resettlement, their hukou and so on. All of them have moved to the centralized point, and the house has been bought. Even if you don't go up, many things will be difficult and unfair. As you said, the situation is very special. If you don't open it, others have opinions. Demolition is another household. What if you take it apart? What about your future production? As an ordinary person, like me, I don't think it will be demolished, but does it conflict with local policies? So we should coordinate with the local government to solve it. What did you say?/Sorry? Please give us your advice.

Originally, it was a * * * household, but later part of it moved into the city. Must we tear down half of the house?

First of all, according to the relevant laws and regulations of national resettlement, the government has compensated the relocated immigrant households according to the relevant laws and regulations of resettlement.

For the original houses after resettlement, according to the laws and regulations on resettlement, the relevant departments have the right to demolish the original houses according to law.

However, if the house of the relocated household is related to the farmers who have not been relocated, or is owned by * * * households, the relevant parties can solve it through consultation through the way of housing association and safeguarding the rights and interests of the farmers who have not been relocated.

To correct it, the correct name is multiple households in one room, not * * * households.

According to the policy of rural homestead, it must be one house for one household, which means that one household can only own one homestead.

As we all know, it is difficult to approve rural homesteads. Some sons will be separated when they get married, but it may not be possible for each son to have a homestead, so only two or three brothers can squeeze a homestead.

In addition to this situation, some rural family brothers are not very good for a few days and have no ability to build new houses, so they can only squeeze together.

This is a house with many households.

In rural areas, when the eldest son gets married, it is generally divided, including parental support, housing and the distribution of creditor's rights. , and wrote a separate list under the gaze of his uncle and prestigious people in the village.

Poor households vacate their old homesteads. If the house is a conjoined house, it shall not be demolished.

There are specific regulations for conjoined houses, but they are very different in rural areas and can be distinguished at a glance. Whether it is a building, a luxury house or a front hall, it is a single room.

At this time, according to the regulations on the family list, which houses in the old house base belong to poor families. If the mansion, building and front room belong to poor households alone, they must be demolished. If there is one in the building and one in the mansion, it can't be demolished.

This rule is also easy to understand. No matter whether it is a building or a mansion, the demolition of half or a room will definitely affect the safety of the remaining houses.

As I said just now, multi-family houses can be demolished. So, what about these houses that are not demolished?

Poor households have already enjoyed the relocated houses. Although the house on the old homestead cannot be demolished, the ownership of the house no longer belongs to poor households. After publicity by the village Committee, it belongs to the village collective and is registered in the county real estate bureau.

Although poor households live in relocated houses, they may still need to produce near the old house base, and these houses returned to the village collective can be used to place farm tools.

This year is the closing year for tackling poverty, and various policies for poor households have been put in place. No one can be less on the road to a well-off life.

According to the national laws and regulations on resettlement, the government has compensated the relocated immigrant households according to the laws and regulations on resettlement.

It should be discussed by the two families.

* * * households, but it is impossible to dismantle them. * * * Household division. It is possible that the application will cost a lot of money, or it is necessary to consult local cadres. Nowadays, the countryside has changed a lot.