What does "eight have one super" mean in precision poverty alleviation work?

Have stable housing, drinking water, electricity, access to natural villages, compulsory education, medical care, watching TV, income sources or minimum living security,

A super content introduction:

The annual per capita net income exceeds the national poverty alleviation standard.

Introduction to the specific content of the "eight have one super" policy for poor households;

1. stable housing: refers to the housing with stable and safe main body, no danger of collapse, and per capita area greater than 13 square meter (including living rooms such as hall, kitchen and bathroom). Houses can be brick-concrete structures, civil structures and wood structures.

2. There is also drinking water: not only tap water can be drunk, but also drinking water that can solve the drinking water problem by drilling wells, water tanks and water cellars.

3. Electricity: The household meets the standard when receiving the domestic electricity, and it is not required to receive the production electricity.

4. Natural villages with roads: refers to more than 20 natural villages (villages) with roads leading to the village entrance. Roads can be gravel roads, cement roads or asphalt roads, which meet the acceptance standards of rural roads and motor vehicles can pass safely.

5. Compulsory education guarantee: refers to the fact that school-age minors in poor households can receive compulsory education, and there are no students who drop out of school because of poverty except those who cannot go to school normally due to severe disability, mental illness or major diseases.

6. Have medical security: It means that all family members of poor households participate in the new rural cooperative medical system or the basic medical insurance for urban residents and enjoy basic medical security.

7. TV: Poor households have TV sets at home, regardless of size and model, black and white or color TV sets, and can watch CCTV or Guangxi channels, cable, wireless or Internet TV.

8 sources of income or minimum living security:

(1) There are income sources, mainly poor households with the ability to work, as long as they meet one of the following conditions, including per capita arable land of more than 0.5 mu (inclusive), farming income, per capita 1 mu of forest land, business premises (pavement), family members who have gone out to work for more than half a year or started businesses to get rich, and other income;

(2) There is a minimum living guarantee, mainly for poor households who are unable to work, that is, poor families who meet the local minimum living guarantee conditions are included in the minimum living guarantee.

9. The annual per capita net income of the family exceeds the national poverty alleviation standard: the annual per capita net income of the family is mainly: wage income+operational income productive income+property income+transfer income, minus production and operating expenses, and then divided by the number of permanent residents of the family. The calculation of annual per capita net income of families is complicated, and it is also difficult to count and verify. In practical work, the personnel responsible for helping poor households should guide them to record their income and expenditure on a monthly and quarterly basis, and verify the income records of poor households every quarter or every six months to ensure the authenticity and accuracy of their income.

Extended data:

Why should we help the poor accurately?

1. China's poverty alleviation and development began in the mid-1980s. Through nearly 30 years of unremitting efforts, it has achieved brilliant achievements recognized by the world. However, for a long time, the problems of poor residents' unclear base, unclear situation, weak pertinence, and inaccurate investment in poverty alleviation funds and projects have become more prominent.

2. One of the important reasons is that there are currently 82.49 million rural poor residents in China (including 6.02 million in Sichuan), actually far more than 80 million. This data is calculated by the National Bureau of Statistics based on the sample data of 74,000 farmers nationwide. This data is not very scientific for studying the scale of poor residents and analyzing the development trend of poverty, but there are some uncertain problems in the specific work, such as "who are poor residents", "what are the reasons for poverty", "how to help them specifically" and "how to help them".

3. Because the whole province and even the whole country have not established a unified poverty alleviation information system, there are many blind spots in helping specific poor residents and poor farmers, and some real poor farmers and poor residents have not been helped.

4. Behind precise poverty alleviation is extensive poverty alleviation. For a long time, because the data of poor residents are decomposed step by step after sampling survey, there are widespread problems of low quality and low efficiency in poverty alleviation. For example, the number of poor residents is unclear, and the poverty alleviation targets are often "estimated" by grassroots cadres.

5. Poverty alleviation funds are scattered, resulting in "poverty alleviation every year"; Key counties are unwilling to "lift their hats off poverty", and the figures are falsified, occupying and wasting national poverty alleviation resources; Poverty alleviation by human feelings and relationships has caused social injustice such as helping the rich but not helping the poor, and even bred corruption. On the surface, extensive poverty alleviation is a problem in working methods, which essentially reflects the big problem of cadres and the masses' concept and ruling concept, and can not be underestimated.

6. There are defects in the design of the current poverty alleviation system. Many poverty alleviation projects are "flooded" and not targeted. They are more "helping farmers" than "helping the poor". Take the poverty alleviation and relocation project as an example. Poor households living in remote mountainous areas and geological disaster areas, it is difficult for one side to support the other, which is the most difficult "hard bone" for poverty alleviation and development. Resettlement is a better way out.

7. However, due to the lack of subsidy funds, most farmers who enjoy subsidies from poverty alleviation funds have moved out with relatively good economic conditions, and poor farmers, especially the poorest farmers, simply cannot afford it. New village poverty alleviation projects, industrial poverty alleviation projects and service poverty alleviation projects mainly benefit middle-and high-income farmers in poor communities, and only a small number of poor farmers benefit from them, with relatively small benefits.

8. To sum up, the original poverty alleviation system and mechanism must be repaired and improved. In other words, it is necessary to solve the problem of who, how and how to use money and policies.

9. Poverty alleviation should be "precise", and special poverty alleviation should be aimed at poor residents, especially the special financial poverty alleviation funds should be focused on poor residents and used in the right direction. To help the poor, we should give timely help. Never use this money to build a high-standard new countryside. Doing image engineering can't help the poor. The development of poverty-stricken areas should mainly use financial comprehensive poverty alleviation funds and other funds.

References:

Accurate Poverty Alleviation-Baidu Encyclopedia

Interpretation of the Policy of "One Low and Eleven Owns" in Poor Villages and "Eight Owns and One Super" in Poor Households —— Jingxi, China