Job Recruitment Website - Ranking of immigration countries - The interviewer was accused of discriminating against Beihou's response. What is the story?

The interviewer was accused of discriminating against Beihou's response. What is the story?

The whole story is very simple, that is, an interviewer directly insulted all the teachers and students of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications.

Let me talk about the basic qualities of the interviewer first. I think as a normal hr, this hr needs to have basic professional skills and professional ethics. If an hr can't control his basic emotions, I don't think such a person is qualified for this job. More importantly, this interviewer is a beery interviewer. As such a huge internet company, why not train such employees? This is something that puzzles me.

What is the cause and effect of this matter?

A 35-year-old job seeker said in the interview that he came here only for interest because he was not short of money and had a successful career. If he has the ability, he can immigrate to America.

When the interviewer heard such words, the interviewer felt humiliated, because the interviewer felt that the candidate had suppressed his momentum, so he decided to fight back against the candidate.

The interviewer began to discriminate against the candidates.

This interviewer is also very interesting. Hearing these words, the interviewer asked the candidate about his education background, and the candidate said that he was a student of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications. The interviewer said that students from Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications are not qualified to work here because his colleagues are from Tsinghua and Peking University. This makes the examinee angry instantly, because the examinee feels that the interviewer not only discriminates against himself, but also discriminates against all the teachers and students of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications.

The interviewer doesn't admit mistakes.

When the interviewer's story was exposed on the Internet, the interviewer didn't admit his mistake, but said that he was only preaching and had no motive to discriminate against others. This is speechless, because the interviewer's skill is obviously not as high as that of the applicant. At the age of 35, he is the big brother in front of this interviewer. Instead of handling this relationship well, the interviewer argued irrationally, which made netizens feel extremely angry.