Job Recruitment Website - Ranking of immigration countries - The difference between state ownership and collective ownership

The difference between state ownership and collective ownership

The owner of 1 is different, and the ownership of state-owned land belongs to the state; The ownership of collective land belongs to peasant collectives, such as villages.

2 Different scope, national land includes: ① land in urban areas; (2) Land that has been expropriated, requisitioned or acquired as state-owned in rural areas and urban suburbs according to law; ③ Land requisitioned by the state according to law; (four) woodland, grassland, wasteland, beaches and other land that are not owned by the collective according to law; (five) all the members of the rural collective economic organizations are turned into urban residents, and the land originally owned by its members collectively; ⑥ Land that was originally owned by the relocated farmers and no longer used after the collective migration of farmers' organization system due to national organization migration, natural disasters and other reasons.

Land in rural and suburban areas generally belongs to farmers' collective ownership; That is to say, unless it belongs to the state according to the law, it belongs to the peasants collectively. Homestead, private plots and private hills, according to the provisions of the Land Management Law, Forest Law and Mineral Resources Law, also belong to the state-owned collective property.

1. In general, land in rural and suburban areas is collectively owned by farmers, but what is legally owned by the state can be owned by the state. 2 wildlife resources, cultural relics, railways, highways, power facilities, telecommunications facilities, oil and gas pipelines and other infrastructure are owned by the state in accordance with the law.