The argument that foreign culture (information dissemination) will affect local culture.

Hehe ↖ (ω) ↗ Come on. . . You must find the bright spot, or you will solve the problem. . Look at the defense. . Then find a new foothold. . Then solve the problem

■ Pro: The development of information dissemination will produce a kind of cultural imperialism!

■ Counterparty: The development of information and communication only brings us more resources for learning and innovation.

This is doomed to the development of local culture. How can it be a blow?

Su Jiajie (debate): Most of the so-called local cultures in the world have been assimilated.

Culture was originally formed on the basis of family or local community, but now it is global.

It has a far-reaching impact on the lifestyle of ordinary people. Assimilation means that although we want it,

There are ready-made things everywhere, but these things no longer have cultural significance and distinguish countries.

The superficial characteristics of culture are not impossible, but they are meaningless for today's debate. First of all, we

On the positive side, I want to say that national culture does not represent local culture. Of course, people have something in common, but these are special.

Color is not a native culture, so we must define it.

According to anthropologists' research, a native culture must be in a specific geographical position. native language

Culture is a self-sufficient economic system, and the information transmission within local culture is closed.

We can't confuse the superficial national identity with the essence of localization, and emphasize the superficial culture.

But it is a mechanical reflection of globalization, and it also protects and creates globalization politically and economically.

The purpose of cultural identity.

Chen Xunliang (opposing the other side's argument): Local culture is a nation in a certain region, and it is responding to the challenges of life.

At that time, the established spiritual, material and institutional wealth, each local culture has its own regional uniqueness.

However, due to the changing environment, the characteristics of challenges are also changing, so the local culture

To survive and develop, we must constantly innovate and meet challenges in order to continue its vitality.

Anthropology tells us that the development of every culture is actually a kind of self-enrichment and self.

In the process of affirmation, no culture is static, so whether there is a blow today is not.

It depends on whether the local culture has changed, but on whether the local culture has improved or declined. correct

If Fang argues that it is a blow, please ask him to show you how to communicate information and how to deal with it.

Local culture has produced two serious negative effects. The first is to deal with the challenge of ineffectiveness of local culture.

The second is to make the vitality of local culture unable to continue, and the development is from imperfect to perfect.

A dynamic process, the development of information dissemination, from the previous language, writing, printing and paper technology.

It has already started, so today we think that the development of information dissemination actually has two effects on local culture.

An important effect is the resources created and the conditions for continuation. To sum up, we believe that information dissemination.

Development will not attack local culture!

Ding Aizhe (two debates): First of all, I want to point out that what we are going to debate today is information dissemination.

The exhibition attacks the local culture, not the advantages and disadvantages of the changes brought about by the development of information dissemination. I want to/I want

This paper demonstrates the impact of the development of information dissemination on local culture in social structure and spirit from two aspects.

First of all, I want to talk about the influence of the development of information dissemination on the social structure. The development of information dissemination will impact books.

Soil culture, such as rural society accepting modern information and adopting mechanized farming, is not just them.

The demand for labor has decreased, and they can't be self-sufficient. Secondly, spiritually, I think.

Emphasizing the development of information dissemination will shake the belief of a culture. Historically, with the traffic

Developed, missionaries came to a place not far from Wan Li, spreading teachings and trying to make more spirit.

The soul converts to one of their religions, and now we can't ignore the influence of information dissemination means on people.

The influence of ideas. In a word, the development of information dissemination will cause a kind of cultural imperialism!

Chen Jintian (two opposing arguments): Today, the other side still tells us that the development of information and communication will have a great impact on the local society.

Culture shock, why? First, because it has changed the social structure. Second, it has changed.

Our spiritual values. But is today's change a blow? We also acknowledge the development of information dissemination.

It will cause some changes and impacts on local culture, but what we want to confirm today is change.

This is an inevitable process of cultural development. What kind of culture remains unchanged?

So today, the other party did not argue that its change constituted a blow. Third, the dissemination and development of information, let

We realize that the multi-value culture of the outside world can inspire our own culture by learning from foreign cultures.

Self-innovation is not a simple imitation, but a positive self-renewal. So we see that,

It is precisely because of the gradual opening of information that Mali in Africa has turned the local culture from barbarism to civilization.

From feudalism to democracy. If this is also a blow, does the other side advocate that every country should learn?

Like the Taliban regime, all television, movies and the Internet are banned, which is the development of local culture.

What about the way of exhibition?

Tang Lixian (three positive debates): Thank you, Madam President. Good evening everyone. We have talked about the local language.

The development of culture and information exchange cannot coexist. Now let's look at the signs. 2 1 generation

By the end of this century, nearly 90% of the 6800 languages in the world will probably disappear. After all, language is inseparable from culture.

Once a language disappears, there is no way to study its record of social life.

The culture of a society will die with language, and it is precisely the development of information dissemination that leads to this.

Survival of the fittest, because people tend to use more popular languages. In the Philippines, primitive

People living in an agricultural society sell souvenirs and small things handed down from their ancestors to tourists, so

Make a living by taking pictures of tourists. The phenomenon mentioned above no longer has the characteristics of local culture, nor is it.

It is characterized by self-sufficiency, which is facilitated by information dissemination.

Hong (the opposing side of the three arguments): Today's debate is a bit vague, because the other side didn't punch.

There is a clear definition. Today, the other side regards any change as a blow. As we said, people

According to anthropologists, it is only the development law of local culture that has been seriously damaged and cannot be returned.

Should challenge, can't inherit and continue, is a blow, so the other side's wrong blow standard extends to the following two.

A mistake: First of all, he told us that any structural change is a blow. Second, the other party speaks spirit.

In terms of value, he told us that once we learn some foreign viewpoints, we lose our authority. We undertake

People think that we have studied the western ideas of democracy and freedom, but our Confucianism has lost its strength.

Is there a threat? Not exactly. The development of information dissemination will only bring us more learning and innovation.

Resources, which is destined to develop local culture, how can it be a blow?

see action

■ Positive: The most important core of local culture, the core of culture, is the economic aspect.

It is an aspect of the development of information dissemination.

■ Counterparty: What is a blow? Are all changes called blows?

Andy Lee: The opposing side has never defined the local culture. Please define it and prove it.

Your definition.

Victor Gu Chian Peow: We proved from the beginning what is local culture? On the contrary, the other debater is right.

There is no clear dividing line between blows. What is a blow? Is it true?

Change is a blow? Ask the other debater to explain it clearly to everyone.

Ding Aizhe: Let me remind you three points again. What we are talking about today is that information dissemination will attack local culture.

Rather than the advantages and disadvantages of the changes brought about by information dissemination, so I don't think you can use the example of Africa.

Europe used to be very feudal, which I think is relatively unimportant.

Chen Xunliang: That's why we say it has brought benefits to local culture rather than a blow.

On the contrary, another debater didn't mention any examples of blows at all, just told us that some cultures had changed and influenced.

For example, does change mean a blow?

Su Jiajie: You are all talking about China and Africa. I wonder if you have been to these places.

But I tell you, these two places are very big. There are many nationalities and books in Africa and China.

Local culture, according to your definition, you can say not to attack local culture, but there are many in Africa.

Local culture, so why not fight?

Hong: It is true that we have never been to China and Africa, but through the development of information dissemination, we can communicate with each other.

Through the emerging internet technology, we can understand what happened in Africa and China, and also because.

In this way, we can understand that because of the development of information dissemination and the opening of information, we can

Let them move from feudalism to civilization. Why is feudalism a blow to civilization?

Andy Lee: All countries are going through the process of globalization, so we feel that the local culture of these places,

China culture is only a part of global culture.

Chen Jintian: I want to clarify a concept. Even if I learned Cantonese today, it doesn't mean.

I won't know my own language, just like today, if I learn Malay and Chinese, I won't replace it.

I will forget my ancestors' Minnan language, so this logic cannot be established.

Tang Lixian: What is the basis of the other party's definition of local culture?

Chen Xunliang: Actually, the other debater just wants to tell us that a change is a blow, and I

I believe that the other debater, four debaters actually study and study Chinese, so the other side has three debaters.

Englishman, didn't you volunteer to punch yourself?

Andy Lee: You have always attached importance to the superficial features of these cultures. We should attach importance to the core of culture.

Is the economic and information aspects.

Chen Jintian: What is the most important function of culture?

Andy Lee: The most important core of local culture, the core of culture, is the economic aspect.

It is an aspect of the development of information dissemination.

Victor Gu Chian Peow: Actually, my personal view is a little different from the other four debates. I think the core of culture.

Include a kind of values, and we know that today Japanese learn from China culture and embrace its values.

One thousand years, learning western culture 150 years, then why is this learning process called one?

What kind of blow?

Andy Lee: As we have said, Japan is not a native culture, but a native culture.

A self-sufficient economy in information technology.

H: Just now, the other party said that local culture has its closeness. I'd like to ask the other party to give me one.

For example, what culture is closed?

Ding Aizhe: Actually, there is no closed culture, because their local culture is gone, because it is fast.

No, the development of information and cultural communication has hit them.

Chen Jintian: The other side told us that the definition of local culture today is that it must be closed.

Yes, and the other side's argument tells us that there is no closed culture in the world today. Do you mean roots?

There is no local culture. If there is no local culture at all, what are we going to debate today?

abstract

■ Positive: The development of information communication attacks local culture in various ways, which is a strong culture in the world.

This was the case in the past, now and in the future.

■ Counterparty: Is it true that only primitive people in the world are called inexperienced native cultures?

Strike, no change?

Victor Gu Chian Peow (four opposing arguments): Before concluding, I would like to point out several arguments put forward by the opposing arguments.

A serious mistake.

First, another debater in the whole argument, is based on such a premise, he told

Sue our local culture is closed, and it must not be changed. That's called local culture. This

Under this information, is there any local culture in the world? As we all know, all cultures should

Do you want to change yourself or learn from others to change it? Are there really only animals that eat and drink blood in the world?

Are the primitive talents known as local culture intact? On this premise,

Today's debate is unnecessary, because there is no local culture in the world.

The second mistake is the definition of an opponent's attack. The opponent's opponent told us that today's so-called

Strike means change, and any change is a blow. If the blow is a change,

Then I want to tell you, when was the most serious blow to China culture today? be at home

In the Tang Dynasty, because the Tang Dynasty learned the music of the Hu people, it introduced the Hu Qin and dulcimer of the Hu people.

I also studied the Buddhism of Hu people. According to this statement, the Tang dynasty should not be called cultural prosperity, but should be called.

The local culture is black and blue.

To analyze and measure a local culture, we must pay attention to two aspects: First, whether the local culture

Effectively respond to the challenges of the times. Second, can local culture continue its long history and spread its cultural essence?

The essence, and today's debate is to explore the role of the whole trend of information communication development in these two aspects.

Should it be called a blow? Still not playing? In our opinion, it will not attack the local culture.

Andy Lee (positive four debates): anthropologist Bart said that culture always has the core of culture, and there are also

Cultural characteristics, superficial characteristics. Surface features include costumes, songs and dances; The core of culture

The mind has two sides, one is economy and the other is information flow. The world looks very different.

The same, but actually the same as the topic discussed yesterday, the world has experienced the process of globalization and assimilation.

Everyone, from the Vatican Archbishop to Hollywood stars, is eager for it, and everyone is involved in currency circulation.

Yes, what's the difference? I tell you, only the local culture is different. The core of local culture is

The difference lies in economic self-sufficiency and information self-sufficiency.

Tribal group, originally a typical local culture, Lao Tzu described a one-way society, "chicken".

Dogs hear each other and never talk to each other. "But this kind of society is rare at present. Why?

The famous Italian anthropologist Melocci said, or the multiplication of communication and the constant information.

Circulation has destroyed the unity of various individual cultures, and the so-called standard mode of media communication has shifted.

Folk customs and mass tourism have accelerated the demise of cultural forms that are inseparable from regional and social factors.

Absolutely, tourism, immigration and media can all be regarded as the development of information dissemination, and the most important thing is the development of information dissemination.

Exhibition attacks have damaged the core of local culture, namely, economic self-sufficiency and mutual information closure.

Although the local culture has suffered such a blow, I still don't think it should be judged by feeling.

Is this a good thing or a bad thing? On the contrary, we should admit that information dissemination has developed in various ways.

Combating local culture is the characteristic of the world's powerful culture. This was the case in the past and it is still the case now.

So, that's it from now on.

(The defense is abridged)

The judges are smart.

Zhao Lingmao (Judge's Representative):

When the pros and cons argue about the word "strike", it is obvious that the opponents are biased.

Fang, we feel that the positive aspect is relatively tight, that is, the blow belongs to the negative side, and it is necessary to

What is less is to let the local culture run away. Whether it is really completely lost is another matter, but it still stands.

They are right in theory. When talking about local culture, Founder mainly mentioned that information dissemination is originally

Closed, even mentioned some cultures of the Amazon River, and retained some residual local cultures.

The most important thing for them to talk about local culture is to keep it original, but obviously, now

It is very rare to find the native primitive culture, using their words or even theirs.

Cultural imperialism is assimilated under such circumstances, so this is their foundation.

Argument. On the other hand, the argument of the opposing side is that the local culture is not static, that is, we can't

When we can go back to the era of eating raw meat and drinking blood, culture is developing. The referee ruled that the opponent won.

Here are some good essences.

Important part O(∩_∩)O Haha ~ Look carefully.

Hello everyone! The other side's argument is very clever and wise, but the fact is not embellished. First of all, I want to reiterate that the topic of today's debate is "the influence of foreign culture on local culture", not "the advantages and disadvantages of foreign culture". I want to point out several mistakes of the other side: First, when defining foreign culture, the debater of the other side thinks that he has narrowed the definition and said it is an incommensurable part. It is pointed out that both sides lose, and history shows that this phenomenon does not exist. However, China wisely knew that it was possible to judge its essence and dross. Take the essence and discard the dross. Second, the other debater mentioned Buddhism. Can you say that the advantages of Buddhism will definitely outweigh the disadvantages when it is introduced into China? It is because of the introduction of Buddhism that China has developed into a Buddhist culture with China characteristics. Third, the opposition seems to emphasize the advantages and disadvantages of Chinese and foreign cultures. You are assuming that history cannot be assumed on the house! We are on the basis of China people's efforts and under the correct guidance of Marxism. Otherwise, we are still in the closed-door period of the Qing government, and the influence of foreign culture on local culture is more beneficial than harmful. Dialectically speaking, as long as foreign culture plays a positive role in promoting, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Hu Shi said: culture is just a living person. It can be seen that the essence of culture is human nature, and the tolerance and unity in human nature endows the possibility of cultural integration. A hundred rivers are full of tolerance. Culture is developing and progressing. It not only abandons its own dross, but also integrates with foreign cultures, absorbs its essence and digests it, making it the fresh blood for the development of local culture. Today's culture in China is actually formed on the basis of absorbing the cultures of various nationalities, countries and regions in the course of five or six thousand years' development. Culture is endless, not static. Today, with the liberation and development of productivity, what can match the development of productivity? The introduction of modern natural science has promoted the development of productive forces, made mechanization possible, and made a qualitative leap in the development of productive forces. With the rapid development of science and technology today, which one has not been influenced by China culture, the rise of the Four Little Dragons in Asia or the rapid development of Japan? Wasn't the Meiji Restoration in Japan influenced by foreign culture? Looking at the European Renaissance, it was influenced by the four great inventions of China. The ancients knew people's faces, but they didn't know their hearts. King Wuling of Zhou also accepted Khufu's riding and shooting. In modern China, we studied the closed-door policy and made progress in the May 4th Movement. The introduction of foreign ideas and the guidance of Marxism–Leninism brought spring to the China Revolution. Reform and opening up have brought new opportunities to the development of China. We can only accept foreign culture, take its essence and discard its dross, so that China can develop better and faster. The 2008 Olympic Games is an opportunity for China. It is a fact that foreign culture has an influence on local culture. However, only competition can develop, which is also a baptism of China culture. People can't be newcomers without culture, and new culture can't be achieved without culture. Use this money to develop our productive forces and carry out economic construction. Use it to develop our local culture and promote the progress of all mankind. Ambassador Ji Xianlin told us that the progress of human society is inseparable from cultural exchanges.

Better fly.