Which is less risky, the quota migration in Austria or the housing migration in other countries?

First of all, I have to say that the landlord is experienced, and few people will seriously consider the risk of buying a house.

When it comes to risks, both of them definitely exist, but comparatively speaking, I think the risks of Austrian projects are smaller. Of course, it depends on the main purpose of everyone's immigration in the past. What I'm talking about below is simply dealing with identity and not moving the center of life and work abroad for the time being.

The following is my personal opinion. Don't spray if you don't like it

First of all, Austrian quota immigrants are settled-there are conditions, and this condition is that they cannot work. If you don't want to work in Europe right away, no problem. If you want to work in Europe, you can apply for a work permit and go to work nine months later. You can apply for a work permit and have a family reunion at the same time (of course, a work permit is not so easy to apply for). In this case, as long as you hold this status legally for five years in a row, you can naturally get an EC card (permanent residence in the EU). First of all, this part of the investment is not that big. It is said that the project of Hengxi International is only 57,000 euros, which is much lower than the house.

Let's talk about the house. The advantages of a house are investment in real estate and permanent property rights. Maybe some countries can immigrate for three generations, but as far as I know, once a child reaches the age of 24 in a Greek house purchase project, it will automatically acquire legal status. Punishment means that the child's identity can be removed from the attached identity of the house and changed during this time, otherwise it will be very dangerous. It has also been suggested that the house can be given to the children at that time, but the grandmother who faces the children may lose her identity. (Of course, this is only the case of buying a house. )

For example, the national nomination project in Germany is more reliable than buying a house first and then applying as a landlord. I thought, after all, I got the nomination, got the identity, and then went to buy a house. Buying a house in Italy is to sell a house and gain identity. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages, and we need to weigh them ourselves.

But for me, I just think that the 57,000 euro Olympic project is more suitable for ordinary people and can gain the status of a developed country in Europe without such strict requirements.