Job Recruitment Website - Ranking of immigration countries - Diploma does not represent knowledge level.
Diploma does not represent knowledge level.
Diploma does not represent the level of knowledge (opposing position)
A diploma is just a piece of paper, and it does not represent knowledge and ability. There are many problems in the present situation of education in China, and diploma is just one of them. But personally, I think that a diploma can only prove part of your learning experience, only represent the "limited" knowledge range of people's education, not represent people's knowledge ability, and can't prove people's comprehensive ability and future development potential. No matter how high the diploma is, some people can't find a job, and no matter how low the diploma is, some people can find a well-paid job.
High academic qualifications, long study time, more and deeper learning content; Low academic qualifications, the initiative in learning is in the individual. Comparatively speaking, people with high academic qualifications have wider knowledge than those with low academic qualifications; Because, how many people will take the initiative to study every day after leaving school?
If you can ensure that you are learning knowledge every day, what you have learned is of practical value, and you can have good knowledge and ability without a diploma; Through continuous learning and accumulation, people's all-round ability will be improved, and all aspects of development will be smoother.
According to my personal experience, many people enter the university to study computer like me, but the courses offered by the school are very depressing. I still have a physics class to fail. Learning computer has nothing to do with physics. All the electrical knowledge involved is taught in high school. There are three kinds of electricity in the course (circuit, analog electricity and digital electricity). I really don't know why the school wastes my time to let me study this physics which I hate very much.
As for specialized courses, the school curriculum is simply too backward. The class has started, and it's no use learning. Even teachers know that they are studying a very basic course, and they won't need it to find a job in the future, but they still have to learn the basics, and they are not interested in learning outdated things. When you want to learn a relatively new theory or software, you have to teach yourself, because the school has no strong teachers and no one can teach you. Books for computer majors are not cheap. The school has distributed a bunch of books that can only be sold expensive in the end, and I have to spend money to buy expensive and thick books in the bookstore. Fortunately, I succeeded in self-study, and I know some professional skills, so I can find a job after graduation. But many of my classmates are still worried about finding a job in the future.
In other majors, there are many problems. You can't learn practical knowledge and skills at school. Just mixing a diploma is actually deceiving yourself. You got your diploma, but you can't do anything, wasting time and money, and you have to worry about finding a job after graduation.
Compared with my peers, I entered the state of self-study when I went to college, and my diploma was useless to me; It is common to repeat a grade and skip classes. The reason for staying in school is to use enough time in recent years to study professional skills in depth. When looking for a job after graduation, if I tell people that I am a fresh graduate, my salary will definitely not be high, because the salary of fresh graduates has been basically fixed at one level. But I took my job to find a job and actually earned a satisfactory salary.
Alas, the diploma hurts! It hurts those who waste time and money for diplomas, but can't learn the real skills. People have to live all their lives. What ability can they live on? First, we should adapt to the development of society and keep pace with the times; Second, it is never too old to learn. When young, students have skills and skills, while when old, they learn knowledge of longevity maintenance. If you stay in the study of life from the moment you graduate from school to the moment you get your diploma, then your life is over. You will always fall behind others. You don't have to wait until you are old. You will feel that your development is limited because you stopped studying when you were young. You can only watch people around you twice as good as you. Whether there is a diploma or not can not solve the problem of lifelong learning; Can not represent people's knowledge level and comprehensive ability.
Now many so-called college students can say: "University diploma, primary school level!" " "Why do you say that? This may be due to our government's current concept of running a school, namely: nine-year exam-free education from primary school to junior high school; The continuous expansion of high school enrollment leads to a total score of 660 points, and only more than 200 points can be admitted to high school. Even if there are few exams, you can use the form of saving help; Without the distribution of college students, colleges and universities seem to be profitable units, and colleges and universities continue to expand their enrollment and try their best to compete for students, just like private kindergarten owners compete for students. The college entrance examination enrollment rate is nearly 90%, and those who fail will also receive many admission notices.
I use the following arguments to prove my point:
1, education can only reflect their education level, it can explain: what kind of thinking level and processing ability you have, but it can only reflect what kind of possibilities you have. As for whether it really exists, of course, you can't read this paper for reference only.
2, ability, see what you specifically mean, education, even if it can prove your ability, it can only prove that you have strong self-learning ability and high IQ, that's all. As for other work ability, innovation ability and leadership ability, I think it is difficult to see from the academic background. After all, there is a considerable difference between practice and theory.
Nowadays, the society attaches importance to academic qualifications, mainly because academic qualifications are the foundation of success. Only with a deep knowledge base can we achieve great things. So education can only prove that you are more likely to achieve your career, because this is the foundation.
4. What is ability in today's society? Anyone who can achieve great things must have extensive knowledge as the foundation, extraordinary insight and profound predictive power, which are tempered in long-term practice and the crystallization of long-term absorption and summary. And all this must be based on knowledge. It is hard to imagine that a person with a little knowledge can design a perfect blueprint.
Therefore, ability and education are a foundation and development relationship. Education is the foundation of ability, but it can only provide reference for people. Whether they are really capable or not can not be evaluated in a day or two, because-a person's ability can only be recognized by people on the basis of certain achievements! It is embodied by people in practice, how can it be proved by a diploma?
To say the least, even if education can prove ability, does it mean that different people have the same education? The answer is obviously no, in this case, how can we say that education can prove ability?
Hehe, these are just my opinions. You have to extract what is really useful yourself.
Conclusion: However, we should pay attention to one thing: since this is a debate, we should be careful not to completely deny each other's views. Nothing is absolute, usually the two sides penetrate each other. Although academic qualifications can't fully prove the ability, it is applicable to a certain extent-usually academic qualifications are not very high (basically limited to undergraduates or even research masters), but it is another matter for doctoral students and even professors. After all, it has been verified by a lot of experiments.
In short, you should understand that there is a difference between practice and theory.
- Related articles
- Folk tales of the Western Palace
- What is the compensation standard for land expropriation in Guangxi?
- Michel platini is from Hong Kong. Can his adopted son immigrate to Hong Kong?
- What's the difference between American chaebol and China's historical family?
- What if the children who immigrate to the United States are about to be over-aged?
- Zhengzhou immigrated to Singapore.
- Zhongmou county political system
- How many kilometers is it from Chaozhou to Leizhou?
- What is the zip code of Baxian Community?
- Ranking of gold content of green cards in various countries